We don't need to do this in two pieces. One single function makes it
easier to grasp, specially since it removes the indirection on the
return value handling.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
---
migration/ram.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index 8ec38f69e8..13935ead1c 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -1128,32 +1128,6 @@ void ram_release_page(const char *rbname, uint64_t offset)
ram_discard_range(rbname, offset, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
}
-/**
- * save_zero_page_to_file: send the zero page to the file
- *
- * Returns the size of data written to the file, 0 means the page is not
- * a zero page
- *
- * @pss: current PSS channel
- * @block: block that contains the page we want to send
- * @offset: offset inside the block for the page
- */
-static int save_zero_page_to_file(PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
- ram_addr_t offset)
-{
- uint8_t *p = block->host + offset;
- QEMUFile *file = pss->pss_channel;
- int len = 0;
-
- if (buffer_is_zero(p, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
- len += save_page_header(pss, file, block, offset | RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ZERO);
- qemu_put_byte(file, 0);
- len += 1;
- ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset);
- }
- return len;
-}
-
/**
* save_zero_page: send the zero page to the stream
*
@@ -1167,12 +1141,19 @@ static int save_zero_page_to_file(PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
static int save_zero_page(RAMState *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
ram_addr_t offset)
{
- int len = save_zero_page_to_file(pss, block, offset);
+ uint8_t *p = block->host + offset;
+ QEMUFile *file = pss->pss_channel;
+ int len = 0;
- if (!len) {
- return -1;
+ if (!buffer_is_zero(p, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
+ return 0;
}
+ len += save_page_header(pss, file, block, offset | RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ZERO);
+ qemu_put_byte(file, 0);
+ len += 1;
+ ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset);
+
stat64_add(&mig_stats.zero_pages, 1);
ram_transferred_add(len);
@@ -1186,7 +1167,7 @@ static int save_zero_page(RAMState *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
XBZRLE_cache_unlock();
}
- return 1;
+ return len;
}
/*
--
2.35.3
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:38:28AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> We don't need to do this in two pieces. One single function makes it
> easier to grasp, specially since it removes the indirection on the
> return value handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 8ec38f69e8..13935ead1c 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -1128,32 +1128,6 @@ void ram_release_page(const char *rbname, uint64_t offset)
> ram_discard_range(rbname, offset, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * save_zero_page_to_file: send the zero page to the file
> - *
> - * Returns the size of data written to the file, 0 means the page is not
> - * a zero page
> - *
> - * @pss: current PSS channel
> - * @block: block that contains the page we want to send
> - * @offset: offset inside the block for the page
> - */
> -static int save_zero_page_to_file(PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
> - ram_addr_t offset)
> -{
> - uint8_t *p = block->host + offset;
> - QEMUFile *file = pss->pss_channel;
> - int len = 0;
> -
> - if (buffer_is_zero(p, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> - len += save_page_header(pss, file, block, offset | RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ZERO);
> - qemu_put_byte(file, 0);
> - len += 1;
> - ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset);
> - }
> - return len;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * save_zero_page: send the zero page to the stream
> *
> @@ -1167,12 +1141,19 @@ static int save_zero_page_to_file(PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
> static int save_zero_page(RAMState *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
> ram_addr_t offset)
> {
> - int len = save_zero_page_to_file(pss, block, offset);
> + uint8_t *p = block->host + offset;
> + QEMUFile *file = pss->pss_channel;
> + int len = 0;
>
> - if (!len) {
> - return -1;
> + if (!buffer_is_zero(p, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + return 0;
> }
>
> + len += save_page_header(pss, file, block, offset | RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ZERO);
> + qemu_put_byte(file, 0);
> + len += 1;
> + ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset);
> +
> stat64_add(&mig_stats.zero_pages, 1);
> ram_transferred_add(len);
>
> @@ -1186,7 +1167,7 @@ static int save_zero_page(RAMState *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
> XBZRLE_cache_unlock();
> }
>
> - return 1;
> + return len;
I don't think it's correct.. We need to keep the retval definition (how
many pages were sent) rather than returning num of bytes, I think.
I'm curious how did this pass any form of test.. because I think we did
assert that:
/* Be strict to return code; it must be 1, or what else? */
if (migration_ops->ram_save_target_page(rs, pss) != 1) {
error_report_once("%s: ram_save_target_page failed", __func__);
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
Did I miss something?
--
Peter Xu
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:38:28AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> We don't need to do this in two pieces. One single function makes it
>> easier to grasp, specially since it removes the indirection on the
>> return value handling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
>> ---
>> migration/ram.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
>> index 8ec38f69e8..13935ead1c 100644
>> --- a/migration/ram.c
>> +++ b/migration/ram.c
>> @@ -1128,32 +1128,6 @@ void ram_release_page(const char *rbname, uint64_t offset)
>> ram_discard_range(rbname, offset, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
>> }
>>
>> -/**
>> - * save_zero_page_to_file: send the zero page to the file
>> - *
>> - * Returns the size of data written to the file, 0 means the page is not
>> - * a zero page
>> - *
>> - * @pss: current PSS channel
>> - * @block: block that contains the page we want to send
>> - * @offset: offset inside the block for the page
>> - */
>> -static int save_zero_page_to_file(PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
>> - ram_addr_t offset)
>> -{
>> - uint8_t *p = block->host + offset;
>> - QEMUFile *file = pss->pss_channel;
>> - int len = 0;
>> -
>> - if (buffer_is_zero(p, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> - len += save_page_header(pss, file, block, offset | RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ZERO);
>> - qemu_put_byte(file, 0);
>> - len += 1;
>> - ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset);
>> - }
>> - return len;
>> -}
>> -
>> /**
>> * save_zero_page: send the zero page to the stream
>> *
>> @@ -1167,12 +1141,19 @@ static int save_zero_page_to_file(PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
>> static int save_zero_page(RAMState *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
>> ram_addr_t offset)
>> {
>> - int len = save_zero_page_to_file(pss, block, offset);
>> + uint8_t *p = block->host + offset;
>> + QEMUFile *file = pss->pss_channel;
>> + int len = 0;
>>
>> - if (!len) {
>> - return -1;
>> + if (!buffer_is_zero(p, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> + len += save_page_header(pss, file, block, offset | RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ZERO);
>> + qemu_put_byte(file, 0);
>> + len += 1;
>> + ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset);
>> +
>> stat64_add(&mig_stats.zero_pages, 1);
>> ram_transferred_add(len);
>>
>> @@ -1186,7 +1167,7 @@ static int save_zero_page(RAMState *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
>> XBZRLE_cache_unlock();
>> }
>>
>> - return 1;
>> + return len;
>
> I don't think it's correct.. We need to keep the retval definition (how
> many pages were sent) rather than returning num of bytes, I think.
>
> I'm curious how did this pass any form of test.. because I think we did
> assert that:
>
> /* Be strict to return code; it must be 1, or what else? */
> if (migration_ops->ram_save_target_page(rs, pss) != 1) {
> error_report_once("%s: ram_save_target_page failed", __func__);
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
> }
>
> Did I miss something?
Kind of, this code is correct. It's just that I made save_zero_page()
return bytes like save_zero_page_to_file() used to do and made
ram_save_target_page() return 1 instead of passing the value from
save_zero_page() along.
But there's a bug in patch 3 because what I described above should only
happen in this patch 5.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.