On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:38:27AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Invert the first conditional so we return early when len == 0. This is
> merely to make the next patch easier to read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index a10410a1a5..8ec38f69e8 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -1169,23 +1169,24 @@ static int save_zero_page(RAMState *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss, RAMBlock *block,
> {
> int len = save_zero_page_to_file(pss, block, offset);
>
> - if (len) {
> - stat64_add(&mig_stats.zero_pages, 1);
> - ram_transferred_add(len);
> + if (!len) {
> + return -1;
> + }
>
> - /*
> - * Must let xbzrle know, otherwise a previous (now 0'd) cached
> - * page would be stale.
> - */
> - if (rs->xbzrle_started) {
> - XBZRLE_cache_lock();
> - xbzrle_cache_zero_page(block->offset + offset);
> - XBZRLE_cache_unlock();
> - }
> + stat64_add(&mig_stats.zero_pages, 1);
> + ram_transferred_add(len);
>
> - return 1;
> + /*
> + * Must let xbzrle know, otherwise a previous (now 0'd) cached
> + * page would be stale.
> + */
> + if (rs->xbzrle_started) {
> + XBZRLE_cache_lock();
> + xbzrle_cache_zero_page(block->offset + offset);
> + XBZRLE_cache_unlock();
> }
> - return -1;
> +
> + return 1;
> }
Can we squash this into previous patch?
--
Peter Xu