hw/ppc/pnv_core.c | 3 +-- include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
The P10 core xscom memory regions overlap because the size is wrong.
The P10 core+L2 xscom region size is allocated as 0x1000 (with some
unused ranges). "EC" is used as a closer match, as "EX" includes L3
which has a disjoint xscom range that would require a different
region if it were implemented.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
hw/ppc/pnv_core.c | 3 +--
include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
index b7223bb445..ffbc29cbf4 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
@@ -299,9 +299,8 @@ static void pnv_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
}
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "xscom-core.%d", cc->core_id);
- /* TODO: check PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE for p10 */
pnv_xscom_region_init(&pc->xscom_regs, OBJECT(dev), pcc->xscom_ops,
- pc, name, PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE);
+ pc, name, PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE);
qemu_register_reset(pnv_core_reset, pc);
return;
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
index f7da9a1dc6..a4c9d95dc5 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct PnvXScomInterfaceClass {
#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_BASE(core) \
((uint64_t) PNV10_XSCOM_EQ_BASE(core) | PNV10_XSCOM_EC(core & 0x3))
-#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x100000
+#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x1000
#define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_BASE 0x3011D00
#define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_SIZE 0x100
--
2.40.1This patch breaks make check-qtest:
$ make -j -C build && make -C build check-qtest
(...)
16/44 qemu:qtest+qtest-ppc64 / qtest-ppc64/pnv-xscom-test ERROR 0.89s killed by signal 6 SIGABRT
>>> G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/danielhb/powerpc/qemu/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-ppc64 QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon MALLOC_PERTURB_=231 /home/danielhb/powerpc/qemu/build/tests/qtest/pnv-xscom-test --tap -k
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ✀ ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
stderr:
**
ERROR:../tests/qtest/pnv-xscom-test.c:115:test_xscom_core: assertion failed (dts0 == 0x26f024f023f0000ull): (0x00000000 == 0x26f024f023f0000)
(test program exited with status code -6)
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
I believe you'll need to take a look at tests/qtest/pnv-xscom-test.c as well.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 7/4/23 22:27, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> The P10 core xscom memory regions overlap because the size is wrong.
> The P10 core+L2 xscom region size is allocated as 0x1000 (with some
> unused ranges). "EC" is used as a closer match, as "EX" includes L3
> which has a disjoint xscom range that would require a different
> region if it were implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/ppc/pnv_core.c | 3 +--
> include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> index b7223bb445..ffbc29cbf4 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> @@ -299,9 +299,8 @@ static void pnv_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> }
>
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "xscom-core.%d", cc->core_id);
> - /* TODO: check PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE for p10 */
> pnv_xscom_region_init(&pc->xscom_regs, OBJECT(dev), pcc->xscom_ops,
> - pc, name, PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE);
> + pc, name, PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE);
>
> qemu_register_reset(pnv_core_reset, pc);
> return;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
> index f7da9a1dc6..a4c9d95dc5 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct PnvXScomInterfaceClass {
>
> #define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_BASE(core) \
> ((uint64_t) PNV10_XSCOM_EQ_BASE(core) | PNV10_XSCOM_EC(core & 0x3))
> -#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x100000
> +#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x1000
>
> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_BASE 0x3011D00
> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_SIZE 0x100
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 01:27, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The P10 core xscom memory regions overlap because the size is wrong.
> The P10 core+L2 xscom region size is allocated as 0x1000 (with some
> unused ranges). "EC" is used as a closer match, as "EX" includes L3
> which has a disjoint xscom range that would require a different
> region if it were implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Nice, that looks better:
0000000100000000-00000001000fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.0: 0x100000
0000000100108000-000000010010ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.3: 0x8000
0000000100110000-0000000100117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.2: 0x8000
0000000100120000-0000000100127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.1: 0x8000
0000000100140000-0000000100147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.0: 0x8000
0000000108000000-00000001080fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.4: 0x100000
0000000108108000-000000010810ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.7: 0x8000
0000000108110000-0000000108117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.6: 0x8000
0000000108120000-0000000108127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.5: 0x8000
0000000108140000-0000000108147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.4: 0x8000
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> ---
> hw/ppc/pnv_core.c | 3 +--
> include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> index b7223bb445..ffbc29cbf4 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> @@ -299,9 +299,8 @@ static void pnv_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> }
>
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "xscom-core.%d", cc->core_id);
> - /* TODO: check PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE for p10 */
> pnv_xscom_region_init(&pc->xscom_regs, OBJECT(dev), pcc->xscom_ops,
> - pc, name, PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE);
> + pc, name, PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE);
>
> qemu_register_reset(pnv_core_reset, pc);
> return;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
> index f7da9a1dc6..a4c9d95dc5 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct PnvXScomInterfaceClass {
>
> #define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_BASE(core) \
> ((uint64_t) PNV10_XSCOM_EQ_BASE(core) | PNV10_XSCOM_EC(core & 0x3))
> -#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x100000
> +#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x1000
>
> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_BASE 0x3011D00
> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_SIZE 0x100
> --
> 2.40.1
>
On 7/5/23 04:05, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 01:27, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The P10 core xscom memory regions overlap because the size is wrong.
>> The P10 core+L2 xscom region size is allocated as 0x1000 (with some
>> unused ranges). "EC" is used as a closer match, as "EX" includes L3
>> which has a disjoint xscom range that would require a different
>> region if it were implemented.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
> Nice, that looks better:
>
> 0000000100000000-00000001000fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.0: 0x100000
> 0000000100108000-000000010010ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.3: 0x8000
> 0000000100110000-0000000100117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.2: 0x8000
> 0000000100120000-0000000100127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.1: 0x8000
> 0000000100140000-0000000100147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.0: 0x8000
> 0000000108000000-00000001080fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.4: 0x100000
> 0000000108108000-000000010810ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.7: 0x8000
> 0000000108110000-0000000108117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.6: 0x8000
> 0000000108120000-0000000108127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.5: 0x8000
> 0000000108140000-0000000108147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.4: 0x8000
>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
It'd interesting to add some dummy SLW handlers to get rid of the
XSCOM errors at boot and shutdown on P10 :
[ 4824.393446266,3] XSCOM: write error gcid=0x0 pcb_addr=0x200e883c stat=0x0
[ 4824.393588777,5] Unable to log error
[ 4824.393650582,3] XSCOM: Write failed, ret = -6
[ 4824.394124623,3] Could not set special wakeup on 0:0: Unable to write QME_SPWU_HYP.
[ 4824.394368459,3] XSCOM: write error gcid=0x0 pcb_addr=0x200e883c stat=0x0
[ 4824.394382007,5] Unable to log error
[ 4824.394384603,3] XSCOM: Write failed, ret = -6
Thanks,
C.
>
>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/pnv_core.c | 3 +--
>> include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
>> index b7223bb445..ffbc29cbf4 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
>> @@ -299,9 +299,8 @@ static void pnv_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> }
>>
>> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "xscom-core.%d", cc->core_id);
>> - /* TODO: check PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE for p10 */
>> pnv_xscom_region_init(&pc->xscom_regs, OBJECT(dev), pcc->xscom_ops,
>> - pc, name, PNV_XSCOM_EX_SIZE);
>> + pc, name, PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE);
>>
>> qemu_register_reset(pnv_core_reset, pc);
>> return;
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
>> index f7da9a1dc6..a4c9d95dc5 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
>> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct PnvXScomInterfaceClass {
>>
>> #define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_BASE(core) \
>> ((uint64_t) PNV10_XSCOM_EQ_BASE(core) | PNV10_XSCOM_EC(core & 0x3))
>> -#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x100000
>> +#define PNV10_XSCOM_EC_SIZE 0x1000
>>
>> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_BASE 0x3011D00
>> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PSIHB_SIZE 0x100
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 10:02, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/5/23 04:05, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 01:27, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The P10 core xscom memory regions overlap because the size is wrong.
> >> The P10 core+L2 xscom region size is allocated as 0x1000 (with some
> >> unused ranges). "EC" is used as a closer match, as "EX" includes L3
> >> which has a disjoint xscom range that would require a different
> >> region if it were implemented.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> >
> > Nice, that looks better:
> >
> > 0000000100000000-00000001000fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.0: 0x100000
> > 0000000100108000-000000010010ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.3: 0x8000
> > 0000000100110000-0000000100117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.2: 0x8000
> > 0000000100120000-0000000100127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.1: 0x8000
> > 0000000100140000-0000000100147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.0: 0x8000
> > 0000000108000000-00000001080fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.4: 0x100000
> > 0000000108108000-000000010810ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.7: 0x8000
> > 0000000108110000-0000000108117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.6: 0x8000
> > 0000000108120000-0000000108127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.5: 0x8000
> > 0000000108140000-0000000108147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.4: 0x8000
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>
> It'd interesting to add some dummy SLW handlers to get rid of the
> XSCOM errors at boot and shutdown on P10 :
>
> [ 4824.393446266,3] XSCOM: write error gcid=0x0 pcb_addr=0x200e883c stat=0x0
> [ 4824.393588777,5] Unable to log error
> [ 4824.393650582,3] XSCOM: Write failed, ret = -6
> [ 4824.394124623,3] Could not set special wakeup on 0:0: Unable to write QME_SPWU_HYP.
> [ 4824.394368459,3] XSCOM: write error gcid=0x0 pcb_addr=0x200e883c stat=0x0
> [ 4824.394382007,5] Unable to log error
> [ 4824.394384603,3] XSCOM: Write failed, ret = -6
Yes. I was looking at this yesterday. We need to figure out how to do
the xscom addressing for the QME. It sets (different) bits in order to
address a given core.
For a -smp 4 machine, the P10_QME_SPWU_HYP read comes in on these addresses:
case 0x200e883c:
case 0x200e483c:
case 0x200e283c:
case 0x200e183c:
ie, the fourth nibble selects the core.
For a -smp 8 machine, the address now has bit 24 set to select the
second quad, so we need to cover these addresses:
case 0x210e883c:
case 0x210e483c:
case 0x210e283c:
case 0x210e183c:
I am thinking about how to map this into an address range that a model
can claim.
Cheers,
Joel
PS. For reference, this is sufficient to silence xscom errors with
skiboot and -M powernv10 -smp4. A different set of hacks is required
for p9.
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
@@ -106,6 +106,26 @@ static uint64_t xscom_read_default(PnvChip *chip,
uint32_t pcba)
case 0x401082a:
case 0x4010828:
return 0;
+
+ /* P10_QME_SPWU_HYP */
+ case 0x200e883c:
+ case 0x200e483c:
+ case 0x200e283c:
+ case 0x200e183c:
+ return 0;
+
+ /* P10_QME_SSH_HYP */
+ case 0x200e882c:
+ case 0x200e482c:
+ case 0x200e282c:
+ case 0x200e182c:
+ return 0;
+
+ /* XPEC_P10_PCI_CPLT_CONF1 */
+ case 0x08000009:
+ case 0x09000009:
+ return 0;
+
default:
return -1;
}
@@ -152,6 +172,13 @@ static bool xscom_write_default(PnvChip *chip,
uint32_t pcba, uint64_t val)
case PRD_P8_IPOLL_REG_STATUS:
case PRD_P9_IPOLL_REG_MASK:
case PRD_P9_IPOLL_REG_STATUS:
+
+ /* P10_QME_SPWU_HYP */
+ case 0x200e883c:
+ case 0x200e483c:
+ case 0x200e283c:
+ case 0x200e183c:
+
return true;
default:
return false;
On 7/6/23 04:33, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 10:02, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote: >> >> On 7/5/23 04:05, Joel Stanley wrote: >>> On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 01:27, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> The P10 core xscom memory regions overlap because the size is wrong. >>>> The P10 core+L2 xscom region size is allocated as 0x1000 (with some >>>> unused ranges). "EC" is used as a closer match, as "EX" includes L3 >>>> which has a disjoint xscom range that would require a different >>>> region if it were implemented. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> >>> >>> Nice, that looks better: >>> >>> 0000000100000000-00000001000fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.0: 0x100000 >>> 0000000100108000-000000010010ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.3: 0x8000 >>> 0000000100110000-0000000100117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.2: 0x8000 >>> 0000000100120000-0000000100127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.1: 0x8000 >>> 0000000100140000-0000000100147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.0: 0x8000 >>> 0000000108000000-00000001080fffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-quad.4: 0x100000 >>> 0000000108108000-000000010810ffff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.7: 0x8000 >>> 0000000108110000-0000000108117fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.6: 0x8000 >>> 0000000108120000-0000000108127fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.5: 0x8000 >>> 0000000108140000-0000000108147fff (prio 0, i/o): xscom-core.4: 0x8000 >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> >> >> It'd interesting to add some dummy SLW handlers to get rid of the >> XSCOM errors at boot and shutdown on P10 : >> >> [ 4824.393446266,3] XSCOM: write error gcid=0x0 pcb_addr=0x200e883c stat=0x0 >> [ 4824.393588777,5] Unable to log error >> [ 4824.393650582,3] XSCOM: Write failed, ret = -6 >> [ 4824.394124623,3] Could not set special wakeup on 0:0: Unable to write QME_SPWU_HYP. >> [ 4824.394368459,3] XSCOM: write error gcid=0x0 pcb_addr=0x200e883c stat=0x0 >> [ 4824.394382007,5] Unable to log error >> [ 4824.394384603,3] XSCOM: Write failed, ret = -6 > > Yes. I was looking at this yesterday. We need to figure out how to do > the xscom addressing for the QME. It sets (different) bits in order to > address a given core.> > > For a -smp 4 machine, the P10_QME_SPWU_HYP read comes in on these addresses: > > case 0x200e883c: > case 0x200e483c: > case 0x200e283c: > case 0x200e183c: > > ie, the fourth nibble selects the core. > > For a -smp 8 machine, the address now has bit 24 set to select the > second quad, so we need to cover these addresses: > > case 0x210e883c: > case 0x210e483c: > case 0x210e283c: > case 0x210e183c: > > I am thinking about how to map this into an address range that a model > can claim. OPAL should have the magic macros for XSCOM addresses. I included a few in QEMU. > Cheers, > > Joel > > PS. For reference, this is sufficient to silence xscom errors with > skiboot and -M powernv10 -smp4. A different set of hacks is required > for p9. > Thanks, C. > --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c > @@ -106,6 +106,26 @@ static uint64_t xscom_read_default(PnvChip *chip, > uint32_t pcba) > case 0x401082a: > case 0x4010828: > return 0; > + > + /* P10_QME_SPWU_HYP */ > + case 0x200e883c: > + case 0x200e483c: > + case 0x200e283c: > + case 0x200e183c: > + return 0; > + > + /* P10_QME_SSH_HYP */ > + case 0x200e882c: > + case 0x200e482c: > + case 0x200e282c: > + case 0x200e182c: > + return 0; > + > + /* XPEC_P10_PCI_CPLT_CONF1 */ > + case 0x08000009: > + case 0x09000009: > + return 0; > + > default: > return -1; > } > @@ -152,6 +172,13 @@ static bool xscom_write_default(PnvChip *chip, > uint32_t pcba, uint64_t val) > case PRD_P8_IPOLL_REG_STATUS: > case PRD_P9_IPOLL_REG_MASK: > case PRD_P9_IPOLL_REG_STATUS: > + > + /* P10_QME_SPWU_HYP */ > + case 0x200e883c: > + case 0x200e483c: > + case 0x200e283c: > + case 0x200e183c: > + > return true; > default: > return false;
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.