From: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>

Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220324181557.203805-5-zongyuan.li@smartx.com
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/811
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 include/hw/irq.h |  5 -----
 hw/core/irq.c    | 15 ---------------
 2 files changed, 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/irq.h b/include/hw/irq.h
index dc7abf199e3..645b73d2512 100644
--- a/include/hw/irq.h
+++ b/include/hw/irq.h
@@ -46,11 +46,6 @@ void qemu_free_irq(qemu_irq irq);
 /* Returns a new IRQ with opposite polarity.  */
 qemu_irq qemu_irq_invert(qemu_irq irq);
 
-/* Returns a new IRQ which feeds into both the passed IRQs.
- * It's probably better to use the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device instead.
- */
-qemu_irq qemu_irq_split(qemu_irq irq1, qemu_irq irq2);
-
 /* For internal use in qtest.  Similar to qemu_irq_split, but operating
    on an existing vector of qemu_irq.  */
 void qemu_irq_intercept_in(qemu_irq *gpio_in, qemu_irq_handler handler, int n);
diff --git a/hw/core/irq.c b/hw/core/irq.c
index 741219277b1..3623f711fe6 100644
--- a/hw/core/irq.c
+++ b/hw/core/irq.c
@@ -106,21 +106,6 @@ qemu_irq qemu_irq_invert(qemu_irq irq)
     return qemu_allocate_irq(qemu_notirq, irq, 0);
 }
 
-static void qemu_splitirq(void *opaque, int line, int level)
-{
-    struct IRQState **irq = opaque;
-    irq[0]->handler(irq[0]->opaque, irq[0]->n, level);
-    irq[1]->handler(irq[1]->opaque, irq[1]->n, level);
-}
-
-qemu_irq qemu_irq_split(qemu_irq irq1, qemu_irq irq2)
-{
-    qemu_irq *s = g_new0(qemu_irq, 2);
-    s[0] = irq1;
-    s[1] = irq2;
-    return qemu_allocate_irq(qemu_splitirq, s, 0);
-}
-
 void qemu_irq_intercept_in(qemu_irq *gpio_in, qemu_irq_handler handler, int n)
 {
     int i;
-- 
2.25.1