On 5/18/21 6:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> The type checker can't narrow the type of the token value to string,
>> because it's only loosely correlated with the return token.
>>
>> We know that a token of '#' should always have a "str" value.
>> Add an assertion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/qapi/parser.py | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/parser.py b/scripts/qapi/parser.py
>> index d620706fffb..ba17f1357ad 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi/parser.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi/parser.py
>> @@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ def get_doc(self, info):
>> cur_doc = QAPIDoc(self, info)
>> self.accept(False)
>> while self.tok == '#':
>> + assert isinstance(self.val, str) # comment token MUST have str val
>
> What does the comment add to the assertion? Isn't it all obvious? Just
> wondering; if you genuinely think it isn't, I'm not going to argue.
> Except about the long line, which you could easily avoid:
>
Yeah, I just suppose it's an artifact from when I was first reading this
code. It wasn't necessarily obvious to me that comment tokens -- which
are sometimes squelched -- must always have a str val that is non-None.
I felt like adding an assertion here required SOME kind of justification
for WHY it was true. Since the val can be None *and* the lexer can omit
comments, it seemed not expressly self-evident at the time.
Less obvious than, say, why 'tf' values will definitely be True/False.
Maybe just my own brain bug.
I'm not as attached to it as other things at this point anymore, having
spent more time in this file since I first wrote it.
Remove if you'd like. The commit message can perform the duty of
explaining more deeply if people need.
> assert isinstance(self.val, str) # comment value MUST be str
>
>> if self.val.startswith('##'):
>> # End of doc comment
>> if self.val != '##':