From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

We are not short of numbers for EXCP_*.  There is no need to confuse things
by having EXCP_VMEXIT and EXCP_SYSCALL overlap, even though the former is
only used for system mode and the latter is only used for user mode.

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200213032223.14643-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
---
 target/i386/cpu.h | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
index 576f309bbfc8..08b4422f36bd 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
@@ -999,9 +999,8 @@ typedef uint64_t FeatureWordArray[FEATURE_WORDS];
 #define EXCP11_ALGN	17
 #define EXCP12_MCHK	18
 
-#define EXCP_SYSCALL    0x100 /* only happens in user only emulation
-                                 for syscall instruction */
-#define EXCP_VMEXIT     0x100
+#define EXCP_VMEXIT     0x100 /* only for system emulation */
+#define EXCP_SYSCALL    0x101 /* only for user emulation */
 
 /* i386-specific interrupt pending bits.  */
 #define CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL      CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_1
-- 
2.24.1