From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com>
Besides virtio 1.0 transitional devices, we should also
set "start_on_kick" flag for legacy devices (virtio 0.9).
Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com>
---
hw/virtio/virtio.c | 2 --
include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index 6508b2faad..6ec45d8f0a 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -2080,7 +2080,6 @@ int virtio_set_features(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint64_t val)
}
if (!vdev->started &&
- virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) &&
!virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
vdev->start_on_kick = true;
}
@@ -2236,7 +2235,6 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id)
}
if (!vdev->started &&
- virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) &&
!virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
vdev->start_on_kick = true;
}
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
index 27c0efc3d0..303242b3c2 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct VirtIODevice
bool vm_running;
bool broken; /* device in invalid state, needs reset */
bool started;
- bool start_on_kick; /* virtio 1.0 transitional devices support that */
+ bool start_on_kick; /* when virtio 1.0 feature has not been negotiated */
VMChangeStateEntry *vmstate;
char *bus_name;
uint8_t device_endian;
--
2.17.1
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:34:56 +0800
elohimes@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com>
>
> Besides virtio 1.0 transitional devices, we should also
> set "start_on_kick" flag for legacy devices (virtio 0.9).
>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com>
> ---
Patch looks good but it would be even better if applied
earlier so that it doesn't revert lines added by the
previous patch...
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 2 --
> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 6508b2faad..6ec45d8f0a 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -2080,7 +2080,6 @@ int virtio_set_features(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint64_t val)
> }
>
> if (!vdev->started &&
> - virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) &&
... here and...
> !virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
> vdev->start_on_kick = true;
> }
> @@ -2236,7 +2235,6 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int version_id)
> }
>
> if (!vdev->started &&
> - virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) &&
... here.
> !virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
> vdev->start_on_kick = true;
> }
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> index 27c0efc3d0..303242b3c2 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct VirtIODevice
> bool vm_running;
> bool broken; /* device in invalid state, needs reset */
> bool started;
> - bool start_on_kick; /* virtio 1.0 transitional devices support that */
> + bool start_on_kick; /* when virtio 1.0 feature has not been negotiated */
> VMChangeStateEntry *vmstate;
> char *bus_name;
> uint8_t device_endian;
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 14:42, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:34:56 +0800 > elohimes@gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com> > > > > Besides virtio 1.0 transitional devices, we should also > > set "start_on_kick" flag for legacy devices (virtio 0.9). > > > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com> > > --- > > Patch looks good but it would be even better if applied > earlier so that it doesn't revert lines added by the > previous patch... > Fine with me. Will do it in v3. Thanks, Yongji
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 14:49:34 +0800 Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 14:42, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:34:56 +0800 > > elohimes@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com> > > > > > > Besides virtio 1.0 transitional devices, we should also > > > set "start_on_kick" flag for legacy devices (virtio 0.9). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com> > > > --- > > > > Patch looks good but it would be even better if applied > > earlier so that it doesn't revert lines added by the > > previous patch... > > > > Fine with me. Will do it in v3. > Hold on before posting, I've just learned about hw_compat_4_0_1 while reviewing patch 5... need so more time to understand the impact. Cheers, -- Greg > Thanks, > Yongji
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 15:14, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 14:49:34 +0800 > Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 14:42, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:34:56 +0800 > > > elohimes@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com> > > > > > > > > Besides virtio 1.0 transitional devices, we should also > > > > set "start_on_kick" flag for legacy devices (virtio 0.9). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@baidu.com> > > > > --- > > > > > > Patch looks good but it would be even better if applied > > > earlier so that it doesn't revert lines added by the > > > previous patch... > > > > > > > Fine with me. Will do it in v3. > > > > Hold on before posting, I've just learned about hw_compat_4_0_1 while > reviewing patch 5... need so more time to understand the impact. > Sure. Thanks, Yongji
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.