All the example code are indented with four spaces except this one.

Fix this by adding four spaces here.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
---
 CODING_STYLE | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
index 90321e9c28..cb8edcbb36 100644
--- a/CODING_STYLE
+++ b/CODING_STYLE
@@ -147,10 +147,10 @@ block to a separate function altogether.
 When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the
 constant on the right, as in:
 
-if (a == 1) {
-    /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
-    do_something();
-}
+    if (a == 1) {
+        /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
+        do_something();
+    }
 
 Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
 Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
-- 
2.19.1

On 04/03/2019 08:16, Wei Yang wrote:
> All the example code are indented with four spaces except this one.
> 
> Fix this by adding four spaces here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
>  CODING_STYLE | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
> index 90321e9c28..cb8edcbb36 100644
> --- a/CODING_STYLE
> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
> @@ -147,10 +147,10 @@ block to a separate function altogether.
>  When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the
>  constant on the right, as in:
>  
> -if (a == 1) {
> -    /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
> -    do_something();
> -}
> +    if (a == 1) {
> +        /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
> +        do_something();
> +    }
>  
>  Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
>  Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
> 

Applied to my trivial-patches branch.

Thanks,
Laurent