[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters

Richard Henderson posted 4 patches 5 years, 5 months ago
Test docker-clang@ubuntu passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20181113180154.17903-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Test checkpatch passed
Test asan passed
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test docker-quick@centos7 passed
target/arm/kvm_arm.h |  1 +
target/arm/kvm.c     |  1 +
target/arm/kvm32.c   | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
target/arm/kvm64.c   | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters
Posted by Richard Henderson 5 years, 5 months ago
Facepalm.  I managed to not push the v3 changes anywhere,
so the v4 changes were done on top of v2.  Ho hum.

r~


Richard Henderson (4):
  target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host
  target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm64
  target/arm: Introduce read_sys_reg32 for kvm32
  target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm32

 target/arm/kvm_arm.h |  1 +
 target/arm/kvm.c     |  1 +
 target/arm/kvm32.c   | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 target/arm/kvm64.c   | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters
Posted by Peter Maydell 5 years, 5 months ago
On 13 November 2018 at 18:01, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> Facepalm.  I managed to not push the v3 changes anywhere,
> so the v4 changes were done on top of v2.  Ho hum.
>
> r~
>

Applied v5 to target-arm.next for 3.1, thanks. (And tested on
both the aarch64 and the aarch32 systems that had problems
with earlier versions of the patchset.)

-- PMM