The TYPE_EMPTY_SLOT and TYPE_UNIMPLEMENTED_DEVICE are identical devices,
however the later use more recent APIs and is more widely used.
Replace 'empty_slot' by 'unimplemented_device' to simplify devices code
maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
---
default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak | 1 -
hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak b/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
index 12f97eeb20..7369b54467 100644
--- a/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
+++ b/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ CONFIG_ESCC=y
CONFIG_M48T59=y
CONFIG_PTIMER=y
CONFIG_FDC=y
-CONFIG_EMPTY_SLOT=y
CONFIG_PCNET_COMMON=y
CONFIG_LANCE=y
CONFIG_TCX=y
diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
index 3c29b68e67..ca37acf7af 100644
--- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
+++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#include "hw/nvram/chrp_nvram.h"
#include "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h"
#include "hw/char/escc.h"
-#include "hw/empty_slot.h"
+#include "hw/misc/unimp.h"
#include "hw/loader.h"
#include "elf.h"
#include "trace.h"
@@ -863,7 +863,8 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
ram_init(0, machine->ram_size, hwdef->max_mem);
/* models without ECC don't trap when missing ram is accessed */
if (!hwdef->ecc_base) {
- empty_slot_init(machine->ram_size, hwdef->max_mem - machine->ram_size);
+ create_unimplemented_device("ecc", machine->ram_size,
+ hwdef->max_mem - machine->ram_size);
}
prom_init(hwdef->slavio_base, bios_name);
@@ -892,9 +893,10 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
if (hwdef->iommu_pad_base) {
/* On the real hardware (SS-5, LX) the MMU is not padded, but aliased.
Software shouldn't use aliased addresses, neither should it crash
- when does. Using empty_slot instead of aliasing can help with
- debugging such accesses */
- empty_slot_init(hwdef->iommu_pad_base,hwdef->iommu_pad_len);
+ when does. Using the 'unimplemented device' instead of aliasing can
+ help with debugging such accesses */
+ create_unimplemented_device("iommu.alias", hwdef->iommu_pad_base,
+ hwdef->iommu_pad_len);
}
sparc32_dma_init(hwdef->dma_base,
@@ -944,12 +946,13 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
for (i = num_vsimms; i < MAX_VSIMMS; i++) {
/* vsimm registers probed by OBP */
if (hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base) {
- empty_slot_init(hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base, 0x2000);
+ create_unimplemented_device("vsimm", hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base,
+ 0x2000);
}
}
if (hwdef->sx_base) {
- empty_slot_init(hwdef->sx_base, 0x2000);
+ create_unimplemented_device("sx", hwdef->sx_base, 0x2000);
}
nvram = m48t59_init(slavio_irq[0], hwdef->nvram_base, 0, 0x2000, 1968, 8);
@@ -1012,14 +1015,15 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
if (hwdef->dbri_base) {
/* ISDN chip with attached CS4215 audio codec */
/* prom space */
- empty_slot_init(hwdef->dbri_base+0x1000, 0x30);
+ create_unimplemented_device("dbri.prom", hwdef->dbri_base + 0x1000,
+ 0x30);
/* reg space */
- empty_slot_init(hwdef->dbri_base+0x10000, 0x100);
+ create_unimplemented_device("dbri", hwdef->dbri_base + 0x10000, 0x100);
}
if (hwdef->bpp_base) {
/* parallel port */
- empty_slot_init(hwdef->bpp_base, 0x20);
+ create_unimplemented_device("bpp", hwdef->bpp_base, 0x20);
}
kernel_size = sun4m_load_kernel(machine->kernel_filename,
--
2.19.0
Hi Philippe,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:10 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> The TYPE_EMPTY_SLOT and TYPE_UNIMPLEMENTED_DEVICE are identical devices,
> however the later use more recent APIs and is more widely used.
>
> Replace 'empty_slot' by 'unimplemented_device' to simplify devices code
> maintenance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak | 1 -
> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak b/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
> index 12f97eeb20..7369b54467 100644
> --- a/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
> +++ b/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ CONFIG_ESCC=y
> CONFIG_M48T59=y
> CONFIG_PTIMER=y
> CONFIG_FDC=y
> -CONFIG_EMPTY_SLOT=y
> CONFIG_PCNET_COMMON=y
> CONFIG_LANCE=y
> CONFIG_TCX=y
> diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> index 3c29b68e67..ca37acf7af 100644
> --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> #include "hw/nvram/chrp_nvram.h"
> #include "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h"
> #include "hw/char/escc.h"
> -#include "hw/empty_slot.h"
> +#include "hw/misc/unimp.h"
> #include "hw/loader.h"
> #include "elf.h"
> #include "trace.h"
> @@ -863,7 +863,8 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
> ram_init(0, machine->ram_size, hwdef->max_mem);
> /* models without ECC don't trap when missing ram is accessed */
> if (!hwdef->ecc_base) {
> - empty_slot_init(machine->ram_size, hwdef->max_mem - machine->ram_size);
> + create_unimplemented_device("ecc", machine->ram_size,
> + hwdef->max_mem - machine->ram_size);
In this particular case of find the name UNIMPLEMENTED_DEVICE a bit
misleading: there is nothing to implement for non-installed memory
SIMMs. It's rather an unconnected device. And the name "ecc" is
misleading too. These machines are not supposed to have any ECC.
Maybe "unconnected-ram", "empty-ram-slot" or "empty-slot"?
Regards,
Artyom
> }
>
> prom_init(hwdef->slavio_base, bios_name);
> @@ -892,9 +893,10 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
> if (hwdef->iommu_pad_base) {
> /* On the real hardware (SS-5, LX) the MMU is not padded, but aliased.
> Software shouldn't use aliased addresses, neither should it crash
> - when does. Using empty_slot instead of aliasing can help with
> - debugging such accesses */
> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->iommu_pad_base,hwdef->iommu_pad_len);
> + when does. Using the 'unimplemented device' instead of aliasing can
> + help with debugging such accesses */
> + create_unimplemented_device("iommu.alias", hwdef->iommu_pad_base,
> + hwdef->iommu_pad_len);
> }
>
> sparc32_dma_init(hwdef->dma_base,
> @@ -944,12 +946,13 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
> for (i = num_vsimms; i < MAX_VSIMMS; i++) {
> /* vsimm registers probed by OBP */
> if (hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base) {
> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base, 0x2000);
> + create_unimplemented_device("vsimm", hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base,
> + 0x2000);
> }
> }
>
> if (hwdef->sx_base) {
> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->sx_base, 0x2000);
> + create_unimplemented_device("sx", hwdef->sx_base, 0x2000);
> }
>
> nvram = m48t59_init(slavio_irq[0], hwdef->nvram_base, 0, 0x2000, 1968, 8);
> @@ -1012,14 +1015,15 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
> if (hwdef->dbri_base) {
> /* ISDN chip with attached CS4215 audio codec */
> /* prom space */
> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->dbri_base+0x1000, 0x30);
> + create_unimplemented_device("dbri.prom", hwdef->dbri_base + 0x1000,
> + 0x30);
> /* reg space */
> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->dbri_base+0x10000, 0x100);
> + create_unimplemented_device("dbri", hwdef->dbri_base + 0x10000, 0x100);
> }
>
> if (hwdef->bpp_base) {
> /* parallel port */
> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->bpp_base, 0x20);
> + create_unimplemented_device("bpp", hwdef->bpp_base, 0x20);
> }
>
> kernel_size = sun4m_load_kernel(machine->kernel_filename,
> --
> 2.19.0
>
--
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko
SPARC and PPC PReP under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu
Hi Artyom,
On 10/2/18 10:14 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:10 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>>
>> The TYPE_EMPTY_SLOT and TYPE_UNIMPLEMENTED_DEVICE are identical devices,
>> however the later use more recent APIs and is more widely used.
>>
>> Replace 'empty_slot' by 'unimplemented_device' to simplify devices code
>> maintenance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> ---
>> default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak | 1 -
>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak b/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
>> index 12f97eeb20..7369b54467 100644
>> --- a/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
>> +++ b/default-configs/sparc-softmmu.mak
>> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ CONFIG_ESCC=y
>> CONFIG_M48T59=y
>> CONFIG_PTIMER=y
>> CONFIG_FDC=y
>> -CONFIG_EMPTY_SLOT=y
>> CONFIG_PCNET_COMMON=y
>> CONFIG_LANCE=y
>> CONFIG_TCX=y
>> diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> index 3c29b68e67..ca37acf7af 100644
>> --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>> #include "hw/nvram/chrp_nvram.h"
>> #include "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h"
>> #include "hw/char/escc.h"
>> -#include "hw/empty_slot.h"
>> +#include "hw/misc/unimp.h"
>> #include "hw/loader.h"
>> #include "elf.h"
>> #include "trace.h"
>> @@ -863,7 +863,8 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
>> ram_init(0, machine->ram_size, hwdef->max_mem);
>> /* models without ECC don't trap when missing ram is accessed */
>> if (!hwdef->ecc_base) {
>> - empty_slot_init(machine->ram_size, hwdef->max_mem - machine->ram_size);
>> + create_unimplemented_device("ecc", machine->ram_size,
>> + hwdef->max_mem - machine->ram_size);
>
> In this particular case of find the name UNIMPLEMENTED_DEVICE a bit
> misleading: there is nothing to implement for non-installed memory
> SIMMs. It's rather an unconnected device. And the name "ecc" is
> misleading too. These machines are not supposed to have any ECC.
> Maybe "unconnected-ram", "empty-ram-slot" or "empty-slot"?
OK. I'll rework on this patch later and resend in another series.
Thanks for your review!
Phil.
> Regards,
> Artyom
>
>> }
>>
>> prom_init(hwdef->slavio_base, bios_name);
>> @@ -892,9 +893,10 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
>> if (hwdef->iommu_pad_base) {
>> /* On the real hardware (SS-5, LX) the MMU is not padded, but aliased.
>> Software shouldn't use aliased addresses, neither should it crash
>> - when does. Using empty_slot instead of aliasing can help with
>> - debugging such accesses */
>> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->iommu_pad_base,hwdef->iommu_pad_len);
>> + when does. Using the 'unimplemented device' instead of aliasing can
>> + help with debugging such accesses */
>> + create_unimplemented_device("iommu.alias", hwdef->iommu_pad_base,
>> + hwdef->iommu_pad_len);
>> }
>>
>> sparc32_dma_init(hwdef->dma_base,
>> @@ -944,12 +946,13 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
>> for (i = num_vsimms; i < MAX_VSIMMS; i++) {
>> /* vsimm registers probed by OBP */
>> if (hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base) {
>> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base, 0x2000);
>> + create_unimplemented_device("vsimm", hwdef->vsimm[i].reg_base,
>> + 0x2000);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> if (hwdef->sx_base) {
>> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->sx_base, 0x2000);
>> + create_unimplemented_device("sx", hwdef->sx_base, 0x2000);
>> }
>>
>> nvram = m48t59_init(slavio_irq[0], hwdef->nvram_base, 0, 0x2000, 1968, 8);
>> @@ -1012,14 +1015,15 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef,
>> if (hwdef->dbri_base) {
>> /* ISDN chip with attached CS4215 audio codec */
>> /* prom space */
>> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->dbri_base+0x1000, 0x30);
>> + create_unimplemented_device("dbri.prom", hwdef->dbri_base + 0x1000,
>> + 0x30);
>> /* reg space */
>> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->dbri_base+0x10000, 0x100);
>> + create_unimplemented_device("dbri", hwdef->dbri_base + 0x10000, 0x100);
>> }
>>
>> if (hwdef->bpp_base) {
>> /* parallel port */
>> - empty_slot_init(hwdef->bpp_base, 0x20);
>> + create_unimplemented_device("bpp", hwdef->bpp_base, 0x20);
>> }
>>
>> kernel_size = sun4m_load_kernel(machine->kernel_filename,
>> --
>> 2.19.0
>>
>
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.