Introduce the auto_topoext bit to to control topoext feature.
Also add new field auto_topoext(in X86CPUDefinition). This will
be used to enable topoext on newer CPU models where topoext can
be supported.
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
---
include/hw/i386/pc.h | 4 ++++
target/i386/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
target/i386/cpu.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
index 04d1f8c..cc30ec3 100644
--- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
+++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
@@ -303,6 +303,10 @@ bool e820_get_entry(int, uint32_t, uint64_t *, uint64_t *);
.driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
.property = "legacy-cache",\
.value = "on",\
+ },{\
+ .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
+ .property = "auto-topoext",\
+ .value = "off",\
},
#define PC_COMPAT_2_11 \
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 86fb1a4..d3411ed 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -1283,6 +1283,8 @@ struct X86CPUDefinition {
FeatureWordArray features;
const char *model_id;
CPUCaches *cache_info;
+ /* Set it if topoext can be enabled in CPU models */
+ int auto_topoext;
};
static CPUCaches epyc_cache_info = {
@@ -3517,6 +3519,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_load_def(X86CPU *cpu, X86CPUDefinition *def, Error **errp)
/* legacy-cache defaults to 'off' if CPU model provides cache info */
cpu->legacy_cache = !def->cache_info;
+ /* Set auto_topoext if both machine property and CPU model supports it */
+ cpu->auto_topoext = cpu->auto_topoext & def->auto_topoext;
+
/* Special cases not set in the X86CPUDefinition structs: */
/* TODO: in-kernel irqchip for hvf */
if (kvm_enabled()) {
@@ -5382,6 +5387,13 @@ static Property x86_cpu_properties[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("legacy-cache", X86CPU, legacy_cache, true),
/*
+ * auto-topoext property will be used to enable topoext feature.
+ * This will be disabled on all the older CPU models. Will be
+ * enabled on newer CPU modeles which can support topology extention.
+ */
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("auto-topoext", X86CPU, auto_topoext, false),
+
+ /*
* From "Requirements for Implementing the Microsoft
* Hypervisor Interface":
* https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
index 89c82be..8783d36 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
@@ -1409,6 +1409,11 @@ struct X86CPU {
*/
bool legacy_cache;
+ /* Compatibility bits to enable topoext feature on all newer machines
+ * Disabled on older machines. Enabled on newer CPU models
+ */
+ bool auto_topoext;
+
/* Compatibility bits for old machine types: */
bool enable_cpuid_0xb;
--
1.8.3.1
Hi Eduardo,
Planning to make couple of changes after testing and review. Let me know if I missed something.
Will wait for your feedback before the next revision.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Babu Moger
> Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 5:56 PM
> To: mst@redhat.com; marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> rth@twiddle.net; ehabkost@redhat.com; mtosatti@redhat.com
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Moger, Babu
> <Babu.Moger@amd.com>; kash@tripleback.net; geoff@hostfission.com
> Subject: [PATCH v13 2/5] i386: Introduce auto_topoext bit to manage
> topoext
>
> Introduce the auto_topoext bit to to control topoext feature.
>
> Also add new field auto_topoext(in X86CPUDefinition). This will
> be used to enable topoext on newer CPU models where topoext can
> be supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
> include/hw/i386/pc.h | 4 ++++
> target/i386/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> target/i386/cpu.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> index 04d1f8c..cc30ec3 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> @@ -303,6 +303,10 @@ bool e820_get_entry(int, uint32_t, uint64_t *,
> uint64_t *);
> .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> .property = "legacy-cache",\
> .value = "on",\
> + },{\
> + .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> + .property = "auto-topoext",\
> + .value = "off",\
> },
We don't need this. We are already setting this false in x86_cpu_properties.
But we need to set it "on" for EPYC on PC_COMPAT_3_0 whenever we define it.
That will be a separate patch. Correct?
>
> #define PC_COMPAT_2_11 \
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 86fb1a4..d3411ed 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -1283,6 +1283,8 @@ struct X86CPUDefinition {
> FeatureWordArray features;
> const char *model_id;
> CPUCaches *cache_info;
> + /* Set it if topoext can be enabled in CPU models */
> + int auto_topoext;
> };
>
> static CPUCaches epyc_cache_info = {
> @@ -3517,6 +3519,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_load_def(X86CPU *cpu,
> X86CPUDefinition *def, Error **errp)
> /* legacy-cache defaults to 'off' if CPU model provides cache info */
> cpu->legacy_cache = !def->cache_info;
>
> + /* Set auto_topoext if both machine property and CPU model supports it
> */
> + cpu->auto_topoext = cpu->auto_topoext & def->auto_topoext;
This could be more appropriate like this.
cpu->auto_topoext = cpu->auto_topoext && def->auto_topoext;
> +
> /* Special cases not set in the X86CPUDefinition structs: */
> /* TODO: in-kernel irqchip for hvf */
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> @@ -5382,6 +5387,13 @@ static Property x86_cpu_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("legacy-cache", X86CPU, legacy_cache, true),
>
> /*
> + * auto-topoext property will be used to enable topoext feature.
> + * This will be disabled on all the older CPU models. Will be
> + * enabled on newer CPU modeles which can support topology extention.
> + */
> + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("auto-topoext", X86CPU, auto_topoext, false),
> +
> + /*
> * From "Requirements for Implementing the Microsoft
> * Hypervisor Interface":
> * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-
> windows/reference/tlfs
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> index 89c82be..8783d36 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> @@ -1409,6 +1409,11 @@ struct X86CPU {
> */
> bool legacy_cache;
>
> + /* Compatibility bits to enable topoext feature on all newer machines
> + * Disabled on older machines. Enabled on newer CPU models
> + */
> + bool auto_topoext;
> +
> /* Compatibility bits for old machine types: */
> bool enable_cpuid_0xb;
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:25:32PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
> Planning to make couple of changes after testing and review. Let me know if I missed something.
> Will wait for your feedback before the next revision.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org]
> > On Behalf Of Babu Moger
> > Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 5:56 PM
> > To: mst@redhat.com; marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> > rth@twiddle.net; ehabkost@redhat.com; mtosatti@redhat.com
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Moger, Babu
> > <Babu.Moger@amd.com>; kash@tripleback.net; geoff@hostfission.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v13 2/5] i386: Introduce auto_topoext bit to manage
> > topoext
> >
> > Introduce the auto_topoext bit to to control topoext feature.
> >
> > Also add new field auto_topoext(in X86CPUDefinition). This will
> > be used to enable topoext on newer CPU models where topoext can
> > be supported.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> > ---
> > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 4 ++++
> > target/i386/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > target/i386/cpu.h | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > index 04d1f8c..cc30ec3 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > @@ -303,6 +303,10 @@ bool e820_get_entry(int, uint32_t, uint64_t *,
> > uint64_t *);
> > .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> > .property = "legacy-cache",\
> > .value = "on",\
> > + },{\
> > + .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> > + .property = "auto-topoext",\
> > + .value = "off",\
> > },
>
> We don't need this. We are already setting this false in x86_cpu_properties.
> But we need to set it "on" for EPYC on PC_COMPAT_3_0 whenever we define it.
> That will be a separate patch. Correct?
PC_COMPAT_3_0 will exist only on QEMU 3.1. If you want to define
something as the default behavior in pc-3.0, just define it as
the default in the device code, which is exactly what you are
already doing in x86_cpu_load_def() below.
In other words, just set auto_topoext=true on the CPU model table
for EPYC, and it should be enough.
On PC_COMPAT_2_12, both would work:
{ TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }
or
{ "EPYC" "-" TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }.
I prefer the latter, but both would work.
>
> >
> > #define PC_COMPAT_2_11 \
> > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > index 86fb1a4..d3411ed 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > @@ -1283,6 +1283,8 @@ struct X86CPUDefinition {
> > FeatureWordArray features;
> > const char *model_id;
> > CPUCaches *cache_info;
> > + /* Set it if topoext can be enabled in CPU models */
> > + int auto_topoext;
> > };
> >
> > static CPUCaches epyc_cache_info = {
> > @@ -3517,6 +3519,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_load_def(X86CPU *cpu,
> > X86CPUDefinition *def, Error **errp)
> > /* legacy-cache defaults to 'off' if CPU model provides cache info */
> > cpu->legacy_cache = !def->cache_info;
> >
> > + /* Set auto_topoext if both machine property and CPU model supports it
> > */
> > + cpu->auto_topoext = cpu->auto_topoext & def->auto_topoext;
>
> This could be more appropriate like this.
>
> cpu->auto_topoext = cpu->auto_topoext && def->auto_topoext;
cpu->auto_topoext is supposed to be already false, here. Why not
just:
cpu->auto_topoext = def->auto_topoext;
?
>
> > +
> > /* Special cases not set in the X86CPUDefinition structs: */
> > /* TODO: in-kernel irqchip for hvf */
> > if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > @@ -5382,6 +5387,13 @@ static Property x86_cpu_properties[] = {
> > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("legacy-cache", X86CPU, legacy_cache, true),
> >
> > /*
> > + * auto-topoext property will be used to enable topoext feature.
> > + * This will be disabled on all the older CPU models. Will be
> > + * enabled on newer CPU modeles which can support topology extention.
> > + */
> > + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("auto-topoext", X86CPU, auto_topoext, false),
> > +
> > + /*
> > * From "Requirements for Implementing the Microsoft
> > * Hypervisor Interface":
> > * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-
> > windows/reference/tlfs
> > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> > index 89c82be..8783d36 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> > @@ -1409,6 +1409,11 @@ struct X86CPU {
> > */
> > bool legacy_cache;
> >
> > + /* Compatibility bits to enable topoext feature on all newer machines
> > + * Disabled on older machines. Enabled on newer CPU models
> > + */
> > + bool auto_topoext;
> > +
> > /* Compatibility bits for old machine types: */
> > bool enable_cpuid_0xb;
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
>
--
Eduardo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Habkost [mailto:ehabkost@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:46 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
> Cc: mst@redhat.com; marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> rth@twiddle.net; mtosatti@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> kvm@vger.kernel.org; kash@tripleback.net; geoff@hostfission.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/5] i386: Introduce auto_topoext bit to manage
> topoext
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:25:32PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> > Planning to make couple of changes after testing and review. Let me know
> if I missed something.
> > Will wait for your feedback before the next revision.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-
> owner@vger.kernel.org]
> > > On Behalf Of Babu Moger
> > > Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 5:56 PM
> > > To: mst@redhat.com; marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com;
> pbonzini@redhat.com;
> > > rth@twiddle.net; ehabkost@redhat.com; mtosatti@redhat.com
> > > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Moger, Babu
> > > <Babu.Moger@amd.com>; kash@tripleback.net; geoff@hostfission.com
> > > Subject: [PATCH v13 2/5] i386: Introduce auto_topoext bit to manage
> > > topoext
> > >
> > > Introduce the auto_topoext bit to to control topoext feature.
> > >
> > > Also add new field auto_topoext(in X86CPUDefinition). This will
> > > be used to enable topoext on newer CPU models where topoext can
> > > be supported.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 4 ++++
> > > target/i386/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > target/i386/cpu.h | 5 +++++
> > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > index 04d1f8c..cc30ec3 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > @@ -303,6 +303,10 @@ bool e820_get_entry(int, uint32_t, uint64_t *,
> > > uint64_t *);
> > > .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> > > .property = "legacy-cache",\
> > > .value = "on",\
> > > + },{\
> > > + .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\
> > > + .property = "auto-topoext",\
> > > + .value = "off",\
> > > },
> >
> > We don't need this. We are already setting this false in
> x86_cpu_properties.
> > But we need to set it "on" for EPYC on PC_COMPAT_3_0 whenever we
> define it.
> > That will be a separate patch. Correct?
>
> PC_COMPAT_3_0 will exist only on QEMU 3.1. If you want to define
> something as the default behavior in pc-3.0, just define it as
> the default in the device code, which is exactly what you are
> already doing in x86_cpu_load_def() below.
>
> In other words, just set auto_topoext=true on the CPU model table
> for EPYC, and it should be enough.
>
> On PC_COMPAT_2_12, both would work:
> { TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }
> or
> { "EPYC" "-" TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }.
>
> I prefer the latter, but both would work.
Ok. Sure
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > #define PC_COMPAT_2_11 \
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > index 86fb1a4..d3411ed 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > @@ -1283,6 +1283,8 @@ struct X86CPUDefinition {
> > > FeatureWordArray features;
> > > const char *model_id;
> > > CPUCaches *cache_info;
> > > + /* Set it if topoext can be enabled in CPU models */
> > > + int auto_topoext;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static CPUCaches epyc_cache_info = {
> > > @@ -3517,6 +3519,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_load_def(X86CPU *cpu,
> > > X86CPUDefinition *def, Error **errp)
> > > /* legacy-cache defaults to 'off' if CPU model provides cache info */
> > > cpu->legacy_cache = !def->cache_info;
> > >
> > > + /* Set auto_topoext if both machine property and CPU model
> supports it
> > > */
> > > + cpu->auto_topoext = cpu->auto_topoext & def->auto_topoext;
> >
> > This could be more appropriate like this.
> >
> > cpu->auto_topoext = cpu->auto_topoext && def->auto_topoext;
>
> cpu->auto_topoext is supposed to be already false, here. Why not
> just:
> cpu->auto_topoext = def->auto_topoext;
> ?
Ok. Will do it.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > /* Special cases not set in the X86CPUDefinition structs: */
> > > /* TODO: in-kernel irqchip for hvf */
> > > if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > > @@ -5382,6 +5387,13 @@ static Property x86_cpu_properties[] = {
> > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("legacy-cache", X86CPU, legacy_cache, true),
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * auto-topoext property will be used to enable topoext feature.
> > > + * This will be disabled on all the older CPU models. Will be
> > > + * enabled on newer CPU modeles which can support topology
> extention.
> > > + */
> > > + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("auto-topoext", X86CPU, auto_topoext, false),
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > * From "Requirements for Implementing the Microsoft
> > > * Hypervisor Interface":
> > > * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-
> > > windows/reference/tlfs
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> > > index 89c82be..8783d36 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> > > @@ -1409,6 +1409,11 @@ struct X86CPU {
> > > */
> > > bool legacy_cache;
> > >
> > > + /* Compatibility bits to enable topoext feature on all newer machines
> > > + * Disabled on older machines. Enabled on newer CPU models
> > > + */
> > > + bool auto_topoext;
> > > +
> > > /* Compatibility bits for old machine types: */
> > > bool enable_cpuid_0xb;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
> --
> Eduardo
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:46:23PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
> On PC_COMPAT_2_12, both would work:
> { TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }
> or
> { "EPYC" "-" TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }.
>
> I prefer the latter, but both would work.
Oh, while we're at it: please name the property "x-auto-topoext",
to indicate it's only for QEMU internal use or debugging, and not
a supported command-line option.
--
Eduardo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Eduardo Habkost
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 4:05 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
> Cc: mst@redhat.com; marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> rth@twiddle.net; mtosatti@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> kvm@vger.kernel.org; kash@tripleback.net; geoff@hostfission.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/5] i386: Introduce auto_topoext bit to manage
> topoext
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:46:23PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> [...]
> > On PC_COMPAT_2_12, both would work:
> > { TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }
> > or
> > { "EPYC" "-" TYPE_X86_CPU, "auto-topoext", "off" }.
> >
> > I prefer the latter, but both would work.
>
> Oh, while we're at it: please name the property "x-auto-topoext",
> to indicate it's only for QEMU internal use or debugging, and not
> a supported command-line option.
Ok. Sure.
>
> --
> Eduardo
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.