Add a testcase explicitly triggering the newly introduce
MPTCP_FULL_INFO getsockopt.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
.../selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c
index ff8fcdfccf76..568e95599355 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c
@@ -86,9 +86,38 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_addrs {
#define MPTCP_SUBFLOW_ADDRS 3
#endif
+#ifndef MPTCP_FULL_INFO
+struct mptcp_subflow_info {
+ __u32 id;
+ struct mptcp_subflow_addrs addrs;
+};
+
+struct mptcp_full_info {
+ __u32 size_tcpinfo_kernel; /* must be 0, set by kernel */
+ __u32 size_tcpinfo_user;
+ __u32 size_sfinfo_kernel; /* must be 0, set by kernel */
+ __u32 size_sfinfo_user;
+ __u32 num_subflows; /* must be 0, set by kernel (real subflow count) */
+ __u32 size_arrays_user; /* max subflows that userspace is interested in;
+ * the buffers at subflow_info/tcp_info
+ * are respectively at least:
+ * size_arrays * size_sfinfo_user
+ * size_arrays * size_tcpinfo_user
+ * bytes wide
+ */
+ __aligned_u64 subflow_info;
+ __aligned_u64 tcp_info;
+ struct mptcp_info mptcp_info;
+};
+
+#define MPTCP_FULL_INFO 4
+#endif
+
struct so_state {
struct mptcp_info mi;
struct mptcp_info last_sample;
+ struct tcp_info tcp_info;
+ struct mptcp_subflow_addrs addrs;
uint64_t mptcpi_rcv_delta;
uint64_t tcpi_rcv_delta;
bool pkt_stats_avail;
@@ -365,6 +394,8 @@ static void do_getsockopt_tcp_info(struct so_state *s, int fd, size_t r, size_t
olen -= sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_data);
assert(olen == sizeof(struct tcp_info));
+ s->tcp_info = ti.ti[0];
+
if (ti.ti[0].tcpi_bytes_sent == w &&
ti.ti[0].tcpi_bytes_received == r)
goto done;
@@ -386,7 +417,7 @@ static void do_getsockopt_tcp_info(struct so_state *s, int fd, size_t r, size_t
do_getsockopt_bogus_sf_data(fd, MPTCP_TCPINFO);
}
-static void do_getsockopt_subflow_addrs(int fd)
+static void do_getsockopt_subflow_addrs(struct so_state *s, int fd)
{
struct sockaddr_storage remote, local;
socklen_t olen, rlen, llen;
@@ -433,6 +464,7 @@ static void do_getsockopt_subflow_addrs(int fd)
assert(memcmp(&local, &addrs.addr[0].ss_local, sizeof(local)) == 0);
assert(memcmp(&remote, &addrs.addr[0].ss_remote, sizeof(remote)) == 0);
+ s->addrs = addrs.addr[0];
memset(&addrs, 0, sizeof(addrs));
@@ -453,13 +485,68 @@ static void do_getsockopt_subflow_addrs(int fd)
do_getsockopt_bogus_sf_data(fd, MPTCP_SUBFLOW_ADDRS);
}
+static void do_getsockopt_mptcp_full_info(struct so_state *s, int fd)
+{
+ size_t data_size = sizeof(struct mptcp_full_info);
+ struct mptcp_subflow_info sfinfo[2];
+ struct tcp_info tcp_info[2];
+ struct mptcp_full_info mfi;
+ socklen_t olen;
+ int ret;
+
+ memset(&mfi, 0, data_size);
+ memset(tcp_info, 0, sizeof(tcp_info));
+ memset(sfinfo, 0, sizeof(sfinfo));
+
+ mfi.size_tcpinfo_user = sizeof(struct tcp_info);
+ mfi.size_sfinfo_user = sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info);
+ mfi.size_arrays_user = 2;
+ mfi.subflow_info = (unsigned long) &sfinfo[0];
+ mfi.tcp_info = (unsigned long) &tcp_info[0];
+ olen = data_size;
+
+ ret = getsockopt(fd, SOL_MPTCP, MPTCP_FULL_INFO, &mfi, &olen);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ perror("MPTCP_FULL_INFO test skipped");
+ return;
+ }
+ xerror("getsockopt MPTCP_FULL_INFO");
+ }
+
+ assert(olen <= data_size);
+ assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel);
+ assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == sizeof(struct tcp_info));
+ assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel);
+ assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info));
+ assert(mfi.num_subflows == 1);
+
+ /* Tolerate future extension to mptcp_info struct and running newer
+ * test on top of older kernel.
+ * Anyway any kernel supporting MPTCP_FULL_INFO must at least include
+ * the following in mptcp_info.
+ */
+ assert(olen > (socklen_t)__builtin_offsetof(struct mptcp_full_info, tcp_info));
+ assert(mfi.mptcp_info.mptcpi_subflows == 0);
+ assert(mfi.mptcp_info.mptcpi_bytes_sent == s->last_sample.mptcpi_bytes_sent);
+ assert(mfi.mptcp_info.mptcpi_bytes_received == s->last_sample.mptcpi_bytes_received);
+
+ assert(sfinfo[0].id == 1);
+ assert(tcp_info[0].tcpi_bytes_sent == s->tcp_info.tcpi_bytes_sent);
+ assert(tcp_info[0].tcpi_bytes_received == s->tcp_info.tcpi_bytes_received);
+ assert(!memcmp(&sfinfo->addrs, &s->addrs, sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_addrs)));
+}
+
static void do_getsockopts(struct so_state *s, int fd, size_t r, size_t w)
{
do_getsockopt_mptcp_info(s, fd, w);
do_getsockopt_tcp_info(s, fd, r, w);
- do_getsockopt_subflow_addrs(fd);
+ do_getsockopt_subflow_addrs(s, fd);
+
+ if (r)
+ do_getsockopt_mptcp_full_info(s, fd);
}
static void connect_one_server(int fd, int pipefd)
--
2.40.1Hi Paolo,
On 25/05/2023 09:17, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Add a testcase explicitly triggering the newly introduce
> MPTCP_FULL_INFO getsockopt.
(...)
> +static void do_getsockopt_mptcp_full_info(struct so_state *s, int fd)
> +{
> + size_t data_size = sizeof(struct mptcp_full_info);
> + struct mptcp_subflow_info sfinfo[2];
> + struct tcp_info tcp_info[2];
> + struct mptcp_full_info mfi;
> + socklen_t olen;
> + int ret;
> +
> + memset(&mfi, 0, data_size);
> + memset(tcp_info, 0, sizeof(tcp_info));
> + memset(sfinfo, 0, sizeof(sfinfo));
> +
> + mfi.size_tcpinfo_user = sizeof(struct tcp_info);
> + mfi.size_sfinfo_user = sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info);
> + mfi.size_arrays_user = 2;
> + mfi.subflow_info = (unsigned long) &sfinfo[0];
> + mfi.tcp_info = (unsigned long) &tcp_info[0];
> + olen = data_size;
> +
> + ret = getsockopt(fd, SOL_MPTCP, MPTCP_FULL_INFO, &mfi, &olen);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> + perror("MPTCP_FULL_INFO test skipped");
> + return;
> + }
> + xerror("getsockopt MPTCP_FULL_INFO");
> + }
> +
> + assert(olen <= data_size);
> + assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel);
> + assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == sizeof(struct tcp_info));
> + assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel);
> + assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info));
Similar to the patch I sent to support old kernels, we cannot do these 4
last assert(), see:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/20230406-mptcp-issue-368-selftests-old-kernels-v2-17-50313e4f83ab@tessares.net/
Because we cannot guess the size of these two structures in the kernel,
I suggest to do this:
assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user > 0);
assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel > 0);
assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user > 0);
assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel > 0);
Better than nothing... In case of error, one would be set to 0 or we
would not get info from these structures below.
> + assert(mfi.num_subflows == 1);
> +
> + /* Tolerate future extension to mptcp_info struct and running newer
> + * test on top of older kernel.
> + * Anyway any kernel supporting MPTCP_FULL_INFO must at least include
> + * the following in mptcp_info.
> + */
> + assert(olen > (socklen_t)__builtin_offsetof(struct mptcp_full_info, tcp_info));
Likely, this should always be correct because 'mptcp_info' is after
tcp_info, no? On the other hand, hard to do better if we need to
support old kernels... So fine to keep it I suppose.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 17:22 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On 25/05/2023 09:17, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Add a testcase explicitly triggering the newly introduce
> > MPTCP_FULL_INFO getsockopt.
>
> (...)
>
> > +static void do_getsockopt_mptcp_full_info(struct so_state *s, int fd)
> > +{
> > + size_t data_size = sizeof(struct mptcp_full_info);
> > + struct mptcp_subflow_info sfinfo[2];
> > + struct tcp_info tcp_info[2];
> > + struct mptcp_full_info mfi;
> > + socklen_t olen;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + memset(&mfi, 0, data_size);
> > + memset(tcp_info, 0, sizeof(tcp_info));
> > + memset(sfinfo, 0, sizeof(sfinfo));
> > +
> > + mfi.size_tcpinfo_user = sizeof(struct tcp_info);
> > + mfi.size_sfinfo_user = sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info);
> > + mfi.size_arrays_user = 2;
> > + mfi.subflow_info = (unsigned long) &sfinfo[0];
> > + mfi.tcp_info = (unsigned long) &tcp_info[0];
> > + olen = data_size;
> > +
> > + ret = getsockopt(fd, SOL_MPTCP, MPTCP_FULL_INFO, &mfi, &olen);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> > + perror("MPTCP_FULL_INFO test skipped");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + xerror("getsockopt MPTCP_FULL_INFO");
> > + }
> > +
> > + assert(olen <= data_size);
> > + assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel);
> > + assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == sizeof(struct tcp_info));
> > + assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel);
> > + assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info));
>
> Similar to the patch I sent to support old kernels, we cannot do these 4
> last assert(), see:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/20230406-mptcp-issue-368-selftests-old-kernels-v2-17-50313e4f83ab@tessares.net/
>
> Because we cannot guess the size of these two structures in the kernel,
Regarding mptcp_subflow_info we can infer it must be >=
sizeof(mptcp_subflow_addrs) + 4...
> I suggest to do this:
>
> assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user > 0);
> assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel > 0);
> assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user > 0);
> assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel > 0);
>
> Better than nothing... In case of error, one would be set to 0 or we
> would not get info from these structures below.
... so we could check:
int min_sfinfo_size = 4 + sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_addrs);
// ...
assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel > 0);
assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user ==
min(mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel, sizeof(struct tcp_info));
assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel >= min_sfinfo_size);
assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user ==
min(mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel, sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info));
/P
Hi Paolo,
On 25/05/2023 18:39, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 17:22 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> On 25/05/2023 09:17, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>> Add a testcase explicitly triggering the newly introduce
>>> MPTCP_FULL_INFO getsockopt.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> +static void do_getsockopt_mptcp_full_info(struct so_state *s, int fd)
>>> +{
>>> + size_t data_size = sizeof(struct mptcp_full_info);
>>> + struct mptcp_subflow_info sfinfo[2];
>>> + struct tcp_info tcp_info[2];
>>> + struct mptcp_full_info mfi;
>>> + socklen_t olen;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + memset(&mfi, 0, data_size);
>>> + memset(tcp_info, 0, sizeof(tcp_info));
>>> + memset(sfinfo, 0, sizeof(sfinfo));
>>> +
>>> + mfi.size_tcpinfo_user = sizeof(struct tcp_info);
>>> + mfi.size_sfinfo_user = sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info);
>>> + mfi.size_arrays_user = 2;
>>> + mfi.subflow_info = (unsigned long) &sfinfo[0];
>>> + mfi.tcp_info = (unsigned long) &tcp_info[0];
>>> + olen = data_size;
>>> +
>>> + ret = getsockopt(fd, SOL_MPTCP, MPTCP_FULL_INFO, &mfi, &olen);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
>>> + perror("MPTCP_FULL_INFO test skipped");
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + xerror("getsockopt MPTCP_FULL_INFO");
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + assert(olen <= data_size);
>>> + assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel);
>>> + assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user == sizeof(struct tcp_info));
>>> + assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel);
>>> + assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user == sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info));
>>
>> Similar to the patch I sent to support old kernels, we cannot do these 4
>> last assert(), see:
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/20230406-mptcp-issue-368-selftests-old-kernels-v2-17-50313e4f83ab@tessares.net/
>>
>> Because we cannot guess the size of these two structures in the kernel,
>
> Regarding mptcp_subflow_info we can infer it must be >=
> sizeof(mptcp_subflow_addrs) + 4...
Does that mean sizeof(mptcp_subflow_addrs) can never be modified?
>> I suggest to do this:
>>
>> assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user > 0);
>> assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel > 0);
>> assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user > 0);
>> assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel > 0);
>>
>> Better than nothing... In case of error, one would be set to 0 or we
>> would not get info from these structures below.
>
> ... so we could check:
>
> int min_sfinfo_size = 4 + sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_addrs);
>
> // ...
>
> assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel > 0);
> assert(mfi.size_tcpinfo_user ==
> min(mfi.size_tcpinfo_kernel, sizeof(struct tcp_info));
Good idea to use 'min' here!
> assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel >= min_sfinfo_size);
> assert(mfi.size_sfinfo_user ==
> min(mfi.size_sfinfo_kernel, sizeof(struct mptcp_subflow_info));
I guess I should do the same in:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/20230406-mptcp-issue-368-selftests-old-kernels-v2-17-50313e4f83ab@tessares.net/
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.