From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Incorrect arguments are passed to fcntl() in test_sockmap.c when invoking
it to set file status flags. If O_NONBLOCK is used as 2nd argument and
passed into fcntl, -EINVAL will be returned (See do_fcntl() in fs/fcntl.c).
The correct approach is to use F_SETFL as 2nd argument, and O_NONBLOCK as
3rd one.
In nonblock mode, if EWOULDBLOCK is received, receive again, otherwise some
subtests of test_sockmap will fail.
Fixes: 16962b2404ac ("bpf: sockmap, add selftests")
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
v2:
- fix errors:
# 6/ 7 sockmap::txmsg test skb:FAIL
#21/ 7 sockhash::txmsg test skb:FAIL
#36/ 7 sockhash:ktls:txmsg test skb:FAIL
Pass: 42 Fail: 3
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
index 024a0faafb3b..bbc3fd57f349 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
struct timeval timeout;
fd_set w;
- fcntl(fd, fd_flags);
+ fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, fd_flags);
/* Account for pop bytes noting each iteration of apply will
* call msg_pop_data helper so we need to account for this
* by calculating the number of apply iterations. Note user
@@ -671,12 +671,15 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
flags = 0;
}
+again:
recv = recvmsg(fd, &msg, flags);
if (recv < 0) {
if (errno != EWOULDBLOCK) {
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &s->end);
perror("recv failed()");
goto out_errno;
+ } else {
+ goto again;
}
}
--
2.40.1
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 16:28 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > Incorrect arguments are passed to fcntl() in test_sockmap.c when > invoking > it to set file status flags. If O_NONBLOCK is used as 2nd argument > and > passed into fcntl, -EINVAL will be returned (See do_fcntl() in > fs/fcntl.c). > The correct approach is to use F_SETFL as 2nd argument, and > O_NONBLOCK as > 3rd one. > > In nonblock mode, if EWOULDBLOCK is received, receive again, > otherwise some > subtests of test_sockmap will fail. > > Fixes: 16962b2404ac ("bpf: sockmap, add selftests") > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > --- > v2: > - fix errors: > # 6/ 7 sockmap::txmsg test skb:FAIL > #21/ 7 sockhash::txmsg test skb:FAIL > #36/ 7 sockhash:ktls:txmsg test skb:FAIL > Pass: 42 Fail: 3 Superseded. v3 is sent, with another fix for "umount cgroup2" error. Thanks, -Geliang > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c > index 024a0faafb3b..bbc3fd57f349 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c > @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int > iov_length, int cnt, > struct timeval timeout; > fd_set w; > > - fcntl(fd, fd_flags); > + fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, fd_flags); > /* Account for pop bytes noting each iteration of > apply will > * call msg_pop_data helper so we need to account > for this > * by calculating the number of apply iterations. > Note user > @@ -671,12 +671,15 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int > iov_length, int cnt, > flags = 0; > } > > +again: > recv = recvmsg(fd, &msg, flags); > if (recv < 0) { > if (errno != EWOULDBLOCK) { > clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONI > C, &s->end); > perror("recv failed()"); > goto out_errno; > + } else { > + goto again; > } > } >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.