From nobody Sat May 18 20:15:15 2024 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA56510A26; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712478500; cv=none; b=DrWT2L99MnhgcsF8ST5RrE4IYuarKWsDkLBsu/mzvMUKcf6jkkA1BbOvhbFwPJToC0nodRxoAxSWulwOEYxcUzRjRGXI0ofUKtV+drCwbTcFhYwmF+iQ7TjSe76vvUmaWJ9CvUuglAiHpUpxtmQ5YM4/waGb20fgZO/XDRoT39o= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712478500; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sQRFh15eS1KcsyILFzsjsuNASDD2MRAK6hYQtzSXvF0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=jQpSoNbuRraXXKj7zsyNIj+I2sIESmlegvR2WhnV3A8/vIeQsyCRvyx+I12/UVmqCA51WPf3m3rxETuiB8U5E7CNtR+fEppPeMD9yqeiW/w2al4CrsqbTF0ZpZHxZGG/0MUDsibGFRZP3uMcPCs9yWkOpTG53AXRVYprwSvmeOQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=h13PZM00; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="h13PZM00" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 008E6C433C7; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:28:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712478500; bh=sQRFh15eS1KcsyILFzsjsuNASDD2MRAK6hYQtzSXvF0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=h13PZM009XrP2abNT1yWDVKHtOrym04yKdHaM5lzb170nD+64MufU7MjK2vMdJnOL J+d0WZvLI+I7s3SfMku3XqfcErvrFg/HvT/izT/3Qzm7vjbMzKn8x/KKMmsgdikHCI PW693o1V5RPuoZWxls1p5eJBrLSRwRnpR9vwTx0wp8iMVoUaSeIxHoX8SoJowiES6J VLrwFoI98T4wU5Bg6Buur2Vll39BYgXg01FLVdNRzYO8RbkA52fw0irO7xkm66QEQD xt0b1N1JJ5iLzK5QnTYrZGzu6ogiL5dVFV5v3bnYJurs80uco1DyuLjp4IofYSlv8K fiXVJ11EIt9og== From: Geliang Tang To: Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Mykola Lysenko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Shuah Khan , Jakub Sitnicki Cc: Geliang Tang , bpf@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Add F_SETFL for fcntl Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 16:28:09 +0800 Message-Id: <6af4240525d760d0d89ed374bfa28826c18c7a2c.1712478251.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Geliang Tang Incorrect arguments are passed to fcntl() in test_sockmap.c when invoking it to set file status flags. If O_NONBLOCK is used as 2nd argument and passed into fcntl, -EINVAL will be returned (See do_fcntl() in fs/fcntl.c). The correct approach is to use F_SETFL as 2nd argument, and O_NONBLOCK as 3rd one. In nonblock mode, if EWOULDBLOCK is received, receive again, otherwise some subtests of test_sockmap will fail. Fixes: 16962b2404ac ("bpf: sockmap, add selftests") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang --- v2: - fix errors: # 6/ 7 sockmap::txmsg test skb:FAIL #21/ 7 sockhash::txmsg test skb:FAIL #36/ 7 sockhash:ktls:txmsg test skb:FAIL Pass: 42 Fail: 3 --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/sel= ftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c index 024a0faafb3b..bbc3fd57f349 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_leng= th, int cnt, struct timeval timeout; fd_set w; =20 - fcntl(fd, fd_flags); + fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, fd_flags); /* Account for pop bytes noting each iteration of apply will * call msg_pop_data helper so we need to account for this * by calculating the number of apply iterations. Note user @@ -671,12 +671,15 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_le= ngth, int cnt, flags =3D 0; } =20 +again: recv =3D recvmsg(fd, &msg, flags); if (recv < 0) { if (errno !=3D EWOULDBLOCK) { clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &s->end); perror("recv failed()"); goto out_errno; + } else { + goto again; } } =20 --=20 2.40.1