[PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files

Dmitry Nesterenko posted 2 patches 5 years, 7 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files
Posted by Dmitry Nesterenko 5 years, 7 months ago
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Nesterenko <dmitry.nesterenko@virtuozzo.com>
---
 src/util/virhook.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/util/virhook.c b/src/util/virhook.c
index 64ee9a2307..763381d962 100644
--- a/src/util/virhook.c
+++ b/src/util/virhook.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include "virfile.h"
 #include "configmake.h"
 #include "vircommand.h"
+#include "virstring.h"
 
 #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_HOOK
 
@@ -141,7 +142,11 @@ static int virHooksFound = -1;
 static int
 virHookCheck(int no, const char *driver)
 {
+    int ret;
+    DIR *dir;
+    struct dirent *entry;
     g_autofree char *path = NULL;
+    g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
 
     if (driver == NULL) {
         virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
@@ -158,16 +163,39 @@ virHookCheck(int no, const char *driver)
 
     if (!virFileExists(path)) {
         VIR_DEBUG("No hook script %s", path);
-        return 0;
+    } else if (!virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
+        VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", path);
+    } else {
+        VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", path);
+        return 1;
     }
 
-    if (!virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
-        VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", path);
+    dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
+    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (!ret) {
+        VIR_DEBUG("No hook script dir %s", dir_path);
         return 0;
     }
 
-    VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", path);
-    return 1;
+    while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
+        g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
+                                                       entry->d_name,
+                                                       NULL);
+        if (!virFileIsExecutable(entry_path)) {
+            VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", entry_path);
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", entry_path);
+        ret = 1;
+        break;
+    }
+
+    VIR_DIR_CLOSE(dir);
+
+    return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -282,7 +310,7 @@ virRunScript(const char *path,
  * @input: extra input given to the script on stdin
  * @output: optional address of variable to store malloced result buffer
  *
- * Implement a hook call, where the external script for the driver is
+ * Implement a hook call, where the external scripts for the driver is
  * called with the given information. This is a synchronous call, we wait for
  * execution completion. If @output is non-NULL, *output is guaranteed to be
  * allocated after successful virHookCall, and is best-effort allocated after
@@ -300,11 +328,16 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
             const char *input,
             char **output)
 {
+    int ret, script_ret;
+    DIR *dir;
+    struct dirent *entry;
     g_autofree char *path = NULL;
-    g_autoptr(virCommand) cmd = NULL;
+    g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
+    VIR_AUTOSTRINGLIST entries = NULL;
     const char *drvstr;
     const char *opstr;
     const char *subopstr;
+    size_t i, nentries;
 
     if (output)
         *output = NULL;
@@ -368,6 +401,65 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
         return -1;
     }
 
-    return virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
-                        input, output);
+    script_ret = 1;
+
+    if (virFileExists(path) && virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
+        script_ret = virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
+                                  input, output);
+        if (script_ret < 0 && output)
+            return -1;
+    }
+
+    dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
+    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (!ret)
+        return script_ret;
+
+    while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
+        g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
+                                                       entry->d_name,
+                                                       NULL);
+        if (!virFileIsExecutable(entry_path))
+            continue;
+
+        virStringListAdd(&entries, entry_path);
+    }
+
+    VIR_DIR_CLOSE(dir);
+
+    if (ret < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (!entries)
+        return script_ret;
+
+    nentries = virStringListLength((const char **)entries);
+    qsort(entries, nentries, sizeof(*entries), virStringSortCompare);
+
+    for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++) {
+        int entry_ret;
+        char *entry_input;
+        g_autofree char *entry_output = NULL;
+
+        /* Get input from previous output */
+        entry_input = (!script_ret && output &&
+                       !virStringIsEmpty(*output)) ? *output : (char *)input;
+        entry_ret = virRunScript(entries[i], id, opstr,
+                                 subopstr, extra, entry_input,
+                                 (output) ? &entry_output : NULL);
+        if (entry_ret < 0 && output)
+            return -1;
+        if (entry_ret < script_ret)
+            script_ret = entry_ret;
+
+        /* Replace output to new output from item */
+        if (output && !virStringIsEmpty(entry_output)) {
+            g_free(*output);
+            *output = g_steal_pointer(&entry_output);
+        }
+    }
+
+    return script_ret;
 }
-- 
2.18.4

Re: [PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files
Posted by Michal Privoznik 5 years, 7 months ago
On 6/21/20 11:16 PM, Dmitry Nesterenko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Nesterenko <dmitry.nesterenko@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>   src/util/virhook.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/util/virhook.c b/src/util/virhook.c
> index 64ee9a2307..763381d962 100644
> --- a/src/util/virhook.c
> +++ b/src/util/virhook.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>   #include "virfile.h"
>   #include "configmake.h"
>   #include "vircommand.h"
> +#include "virstring.h"
>   
>   #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_HOOK
>   
> @@ -141,7 +142,11 @@ static int virHooksFound = -1;
>   static int
>   virHookCheck(int no, const char *driver)
>   {
> +    int ret;
> +    DIR *dir;
> +    struct dirent *entry;
>       g_autofree char *path = NULL;
> +    g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
>   
>       if (driver == NULL) {
>           virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> @@ -158,16 +163,39 @@ virHookCheck(int no, const char *driver)
>   
>       if (!virFileExists(path)) {
>           VIR_DEBUG("No hook script %s", path);
> -        return 0;
> +    } else if (!virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
> +        VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", path);
> +    } else {
> +        VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", path);
> +        return 1;
>       }
>   
> -    if (!virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
> -        VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", path);
> +    dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
> +    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
> +        return -1;
> +
> +    if (!ret) {
> +        VIR_DEBUG("No hook script dir %s", dir_path);
>           return 0;
>       }
>   
> -    VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", path);
> -    return 1;
> +    while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
> +        g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
> +                                                       entry->d_name,
> +                                                       NULL);
> +        if (!virFileIsExecutable(entry_path)) {
> +            VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", entry_path);
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +        VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", entry_path);
> +        ret = 1;
> +        break;
> +    }
> +
> +    VIR_DIR_CLOSE(dir);
> +
> +    return ret;
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -282,7 +310,7 @@ virRunScript(const char *path,
>    * @input: extra input given to the script on stdin
>    * @output: optional address of variable to store malloced result buffer
>    *
> - * Implement a hook call, where the external script for the driver is
> + * Implement a hook call, where the external scripts for the driver is
>    * called with the given information. This is a synchronous call, we wait for
>    * execution completion. If @output is non-NULL, *output is guaranteed to be
>    * allocated after successful virHookCall, and is best-effort allocated after
> @@ -300,11 +328,16 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
>               const char *input,
>               char **output)
>   {
> +    int ret, script_ret;
> +    DIR *dir;
> +    struct dirent *entry;
>       g_autofree char *path = NULL;
> -    g_autoptr(virCommand) cmd = NULL;
> +    g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
> +    VIR_AUTOSTRINGLIST entries = NULL;
>       const char *drvstr;
>       const char *opstr;
>       const char *subopstr;
> +    size_t i, nentries;
>   
>       if (output)
>           *output = NULL;
> @@ -368,6 +401,65 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
>           return -1;
>       }
>   
> -    return virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
> -                        input, output);
> +    script_ret = 1;
> +
> +    if (virFileExists(path) && virFileIsExecutable(path)) {

virFileIsExecutable() is enough. It won't return true for a non-existent 
file.

> +        script_ret = virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
> +                                  input, output);
> +        if (script_ret < 0 && output)

I'm not sure we want this check for output. What if caller passed output 
= NULL - just like can be seen in the hunk above?

But this opens a good question - whether to stop processing hook scripts 
on the first failure or continue through all scripts and report error 
only if at least one of them returned failure. I think we should go with 
the former and stop processing at the first failure.

> +            return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
> +    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
> +        return -1;
> +
> +    if (!ret)
> +        return script_ret;
> +
> +    while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
> +        g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
> +                                                       entry->d_name,
> +                                                       NULL);
> +        if (!virFileIsExecutable(entry_path))
> +            continue;
> +
> +        virStringListAdd(&entries, entry_path);
> +    }
> +
> +    VIR_DIR_CLOSE(dir);
> +
> +    if (ret < 0)
> +        return -1;
> +
> +    if (!entries)
> +        return script_ret;
> +
> +    nentries = virStringListLength((const char **)entries);
> +    qsort(entries, nentries, sizeof(*entries), virStringSortCompare);
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++) {
> +        int entry_ret;
> +        char *entry_input;
> +        g_autofree char *entry_output = NULL;
> +
> +        /* Get input from previous output */
> +        entry_input = (!script_ret && output &&
> +                       !virStringIsEmpty(*output)) ? *output : (char *)input;
> +        entry_ret = virRunScript(entries[i], id, opstr,
> +                                 subopstr, extra, entry_input,
> +                                 (output) ? &entry_output : NULL);
> +        if (entry_ret < 0 && output)
> +            return -1;
> +        if (entry_ret < script_ret)
> +            script_ret = entry_ret;
> +
> +        /* Replace output to new output from item */
> +        if (output && !virStringIsEmpty(entry_output)) {
> +            g_free(*output);
> +            *output = g_steal_pointer(&entry_output);
> +        }

This is not something we've discussed ;-) But I guess it only makes 
sense. If you have X hook scripts, each one modifying only the part of 
the domain XML then you want to chain their outputs to produce the 
desired output.

Do we want to feed the first script here with the output of the old one? 
I mean, if you have both:

/etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu
/etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu.d/01-hook
/etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu.d/02-hook

they will be executed in this order. Good. And 01-hook will pass the 
output to 02-hook. Good. But what about 'qemu' and 01-hook? It's only 
fair to chain the output, isn't it?



Anyway, this is what I'd squash in:

diff --git i/src/util/virhook.c w/src/util/virhook.c
index 763381d962..f0c44d5c9d 100644
--- i/src/util/virhook.c
+++ w/src/util/virhook.c
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
              const char *input,
              char **output)
  {
-    int ret, script_ret;
-    DIR *dir;
+    int ret;
+    DIR *dir = NULL;
      struct dirent *entry;
      g_autofree char *path = NULL;
      g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
@@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
      const char *drvstr;
      const char *opstr;
      const char *subopstr;
+    const char *entry_input = input;
      size_t i, nentries;

      if (output)
@@ -401,21 +402,21 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
          return -1;
      }

-    script_ret = 1;
-
-    if (virFileExists(path) && virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
-        script_ret = virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
-                                  input, output);
-        if (script_ret < 0 && output)
+    if (virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
+        if (virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra, entry_input, 
output) < 0)
              return -1;
+
+        /* The script output is input of next script. */
+        if (output)
+            entry_input = *output;
      }

      dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
-    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
+    if (virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path) < 0)
          return -1;

-    if (!ret)
-        return script_ret;
+    if (!dir)
+        return 0;

      while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
          g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
@@ -433,33 +434,26 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
          return -1;

      if (!entries)
-        return script_ret;
+        return 0;

      nentries = virStringListLength((const char **)entries);
      qsort(entries, nentries, sizeof(*entries), virStringSortCompare);

      for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++) {
-        int entry_ret;
-        char *entry_input;
-        g_autofree char *entry_output = NULL;
+        char *entry_output = NULL;

-        /* Get input from previous output */
-        entry_input = (!script_ret && output &&
-                       !virStringIsEmpty(*output)) ? *output : (char 
*)input;
-        entry_ret = virRunScript(entries[i], id, opstr,
-                                 subopstr, extra, entry_input,
-                                 (output) ? &entry_output : NULL);
-        if (entry_ret < 0 && output)
+        if (virRunScript(entries[i], id, opstr,
+                         subopstr, extra, entry_input,
+                         (output) ? &entry_output : NULL) < 0)
              return -1;
-        if (entry_ret < script_ret)
-            script_ret = entry_ret;

          /* Replace output to new output from item */
-        if (output && !virStringIsEmpty(entry_output)) {
+        if (output) {
              g_free(*output);
              *output = g_steal_pointer(&entry_output);
+            entry_input = *output;
          }
      }

-    return script_ret;
+    return 0;
  }



Michal

Re: [PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files
Posted by Dmitry Nesterenko 5 years, 7 months ago
> virFileIsExecutable() is enough

I agree and will fix it in next version of patch.


> I'm not sure we want this check for output

If we are given param for xml output - it is call hook for "migrate" or "restore" and any fail
from script can break the process. So we can break running of all scripts immediately after
first fail. But if we don't have xml param for output - it can be call hook for stop with ignoring return code of script.  And I think in this case will better to run all scripts.


> But what about 'qemu' and 01-hook? It's only fair to chain the output, isn't it?

Yes of course. And I did it. Output from first script will be used as input for next script. See next lines:
        /* Get input from previous output */
        entry_input = (!script_ret && output &&
                       !virStringIsEmpty(*output)) ? *output : (char *)input;

________________________________________
From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 4:06 PM
To: Dmitry Nesterenko; libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files

On 6/21/20 11:16 PM, Dmitry Nesterenko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Nesterenko <dmitry.nesterenko@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>   src/util/virhook.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virhook.c b/src/util/virhook.c
> index 64ee9a2307..763381d962 100644
> --- a/src/util/virhook.c
> +++ b/src/util/virhook.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>   #include "virfile.h"
>   #include "configmake.h"
>   #include "vircommand.h"
> +#include "virstring.h"
>
>   #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_HOOK
>
> @@ -141,7 +142,11 @@ static int virHooksFound = -1;
>   static int
>   virHookCheck(int no, const char *driver)
>   {
> +    int ret;
> +    DIR *dir;
> +    struct dirent *entry;
>       g_autofree char *path = NULL;
> +    g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
>
>       if (driver == NULL) {
>           virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> @@ -158,16 +163,39 @@ virHookCheck(int no, const char *driver)
>
>       if (!virFileExists(path)) {
>           VIR_DEBUG("No hook script %s", path);
> -        return 0;
> +    } else if (!virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
> +        VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", path);
> +    } else {
> +        VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", path);
> +        return 1;
>       }
>
> -    if (!virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
> -        VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", path);
> +    dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
> +    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
> +        return -1;
> +
> +    if (!ret) {
> +        VIR_DEBUG("No hook script dir %s", dir_path);
>           return 0;
>       }
>
> -    VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", path);
> -    return 1;
> +    while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
> +        g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
> +                                                       entry->d_name,
> +                                                       NULL);
> +        if (!virFileIsExecutable(entry_path)) {
> +            VIR_WARN("Non-executable hook script %s", entry_path);
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +        VIR_DEBUG("Found hook script %s", entry_path);
> +        ret = 1;
> +        break;
> +    }
> +
> +    VIR_DIR_CLOSE(dir);
> +
> +    return ret;
>   }
>
>   /*
> @@ -282,7 +310,7 @@ virRunScript(const char *path,
>    * @input: extra input given to the script on stdin
>    * @output: optional address of variable to store malloced result buffer
>    *
> - * Implement a hook call, where the external script for the driver is
> + * Implement a hook call, where the external scripts for the driver is
>    * called with the given information. This is a synchronous call, we wait for
>    * execution completion. If @output is non-NULL, *output is guaranteed to be
>    * allocated after successful virHookCall, and is best-effort allocated after
> @@ -300,11 +328,16 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
>               const char *input,
>               char **output)
>   {
> +    int ret, script_ret;
> +    DIR *dir;
> +    struct dirent *entry;
>       g_autofree char *path = NULL;
> -    g_autoptr(virCommand) cmd = NULL;
> +    g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
> +    VIR_AUTOSTRINGLIST entries = NULL;
>       const char *drvstr;
>       const char *opstr;
>       const char *subopstr;
> +    size_t i, nentries;
>
>       if (output)
>           *output = NULL;
> @@ -368,6 +401,65 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
>           return -1;
>       }
>
> -    return virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
> -                        input, output);
> +    script_ret = 1;
> +
> +    if (virFileExists(path) && virFileIsExecutable(path)) {

virFileIsExecutable() is enough. It won't return true for a non-existent
file.

> +        script_ret = virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
> +                                  input, output);
> +        if (script_ret < 0 && output)

I'm not sure we want this check for output. What if caller passed output
= NULL - just like can be seen in the hunk above?

But this opens a good question - whether to stop processing hook scripts
on the first failure or continue through all scripts and report error
only if at least one of them returned failure. I think we should go with
the former and stop processing at the first failure.

> +            return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
> +    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
> +        return -1;
> +
> +    if (!ret)
> +        return script_ret;
> +
> +    while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
> +        g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
> +                                                       entry->d_name,
> +                                                       NULL);
> +        if (!virFileIsExecutable(entry_path))
> +            continue;
> +
> +        virStringListAdd(&entries, entry_path);
> +    }
> +
> +    VIR_DIR_CLOSE(dir);
> +
> +    if (ret < 0)
> +        return -1;
> +
> +    if (!entries)
> +        return script_ret;
> +
> +    nentries = virStringListLength((const char **)entries);
> +    qsort(entries, nentries, sizeof(*entries), virStringSortCompare);
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++) {
> +        int entry_ret;
> +        char *entry_input;
> +        g_autofree char *entry_output = NULL;
> +
> +        /* Get input from previous output */
> +        entry_input = (!script_ret && output &&
> +                       !virStringIsEmpty(*output)) ? *output : (char *)input;
> +        entry_ret = virRunScript(entries[i], id, opstr,
> +                                 subopstr, extra, entry_input,
> +                                 (output) ? &entry_output : NULL);
> +        if (entry_ret < 0 && output)
> +            return -1;
> +        if (entry_ret < script_ret)
> +            script_ret = entry_ret;
> +
> +        /* Replace output to new output from item */
> +        if (output && !virStringIsEmpty(entry_output)) {
> +            g_free(*output);
> +            *output = g_steal_pointer(&entry_output);
> +        }

This is not something we've discussed ;-) But I guess it only makes
sense. If you have X hook scripts, each one modifying only the part of
the domain XML then you want to chain their outputs to produce the
desired output.

Do we want to feed the first script here with the output of the old one?
I mean, if you have both:

/etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu
/etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu.d/01-hook
/etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu.d/02-hook

they will be executed in this order. Good. And 01-hook will pass the
output to 02-hook. Good. But what about 'qemu' and 01-hook? It's only
fair to chain the output, isn't it?



Anyway, this is what I'd squash in:

diff --git i/src/util/virhook.c w/src/util/virhook.c
index 763381d962..f0c44d5c9d 100644
--- i/src/util/virhook.c
+++ w/src/util/virhook.c
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
              const char *input,
              char **output)
  {
-    int ret, script_ret;
-    DIR *dir;
+    int ret;
+    DIR *dir = NULL;
      struct dirent *entry;
      g_autofree char *path = NULL;
      g_autofree char *dir_path = NULL;
@@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
      const char *drvstr;
      const char *opstr;
      const char *subopstr;
+    const char *entry_input = input;
      size_t i, nentries;

      if (output)
@@ -401,21 +402,21 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
          return -1;
      }

-    script_ret = 1;
-
-    if (virFileExists(path) && virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
-        script_ret = virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra,
-                                  input, output);
-        if (script_ret < 0 && output)
+    if (virFileIsExecutable(path)) {
+        if (virRunScript(path, id, opstr, subopstr, extra, entry_input,
output) < 0)
              return -1;
+
+        /* The script output is input of next script. */
+        if (output)
+            entry_input = *output;
      }

      dir_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.d", path);
-    if ((ret = virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path)) < 0)
+    if (virDirOpenIfExists(&dir, dir_path) < 0)
          return -1;

-    if (!ret)
-        return script_ret;
+    if (!dir)
+        return 0;

      while ((ret = virDirRead(dir, &entry, dir_path)) > 0) {
          g_autofree char *entry_path = g_build_filename(dir_path,
@@ -433,33 +434,26 @@ virHookCall(int driver,
          return -1;

      if (!entries)
-        return script_ret;
+        return 0;

      nentries = virStringListLength((const char **)entries);
      qsort(entries, nentries, sizeof(*entries), virStringSortCompare);

      for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++) {
-        int entry_ret;
-        char *entry_input;
-        g_autofree char *entry_output = NULL;
+        char *entry_output = NULL;

-        /* Get input from previous output */
-        entry_input = (!script_ret && output &&
-                       !virStringIsEmpty(*output)) ? *output : (char
*)input;
-        entry_ret = virRunScript(entries[i], id, opstr,
-                                 subopstr, extra, entry_input,
-                                 (output) ? &entry_output : NULL);
-        if (entry_ret < 0 && output)
+        if (virRunScript(entries[i], id, opstr,
+                         subopstr, extra, entry_input,
+                         (output) ? &entry_output : NULL) < 0)
              return -1;
-        if (entry_ret < script_ret)
-            script_ret = entry_ret;

          /* Replace output to new output from item */
-        if (output && !virStringIsEmpty(entry_output)) {
+        if (output) {
              g_free(*output);
              *output = g_steal_pointer(&entry_output);
+            entry_input = *output;
          }
      }

-    return script_ret;
+    return 0;
  }



Michal

Re: [PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files
Posted by Michal Privoznik 5 years, 7 months ago
On 6/23/20 10:24 AM, Dmitry Nesterenko wrote:
> 
>> virFileIsExecutable() is enough
> 
> I agree and will fix it in next version of patch.
> 
> 
>> I'm not sure we want this check for output
> 
> If we are given param for xml output - it is call hook for "migrate" or "restore" and any fail
> from script can break the process. So we can break running of all scripts immediately after
> first fail. But if we don't have xml param for output - it can be call hook for stop with ignoring return code of script.  And I think in this case will better to run all scripts.

Well, apparently output != NULL is not enough to tell whether we can 
stop or not. For instance: qemuProcessStartHook() which is called when a 
domain is starting up. The output is NULL (the script can't change the 
domain XML), but if it fails the start of the domain is aborted.

But that leads me to think that maybe after all we should run all hook 
scripts and report failure if either of them failed. Because of 
instance, if I have two hook scripts, one sets up one resource for the 
domain, the other sets up some other resource for the domain; and both 
of them would be run on domain startup I want them both to run on domain 
shutdown to release the resources.
But, if say the first script fails on domain startup, so the startup 
process is aborted, qemuProcessStop() is called which executes both 
scripts again. I mean, we would not have paired "prepare" and "release" 
calls for both scripts.

We can declare that hook scripts have to take care of that and to some 
extend they already are doing so, because even now, with one hook script 
per driver the "release" implementation must cope with unbalanced call, 
because if domain start up fails slightly earlier, before "prepare" is 
called, then "release" is called anyway.

Michal

Re: [PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files
Posted by Dmitry Nesterenko 5 years, 7 months ago
> But that leads me to think that maybe after all we should run all hook
scripts and report failure if either of them failed.
> we would not have paired "prepare" and "release" calls for both scripts.

I agree with you. I will do this scheme - always run all scripts.

Dmitry

________________________________________
From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:03 PM
To: Dmitry Nesterenko; libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virhook: support hooks placed in several files

On 6/23/20 10:24 AM, Dmitry Nesterenko wrote:
>
>> virFileIsExecutable() is enough
>
> I agree and will fix it in next version of patch.
>
>
>> I'm not sure we want this check for output
>
> If we are given param for xml output - it is call hook for "migrate" or "restore" and any fail
> from script can break the process. So we can break running of all scripts immediately after
> first fail. But if we don't have xml param for output - it can be call hook for stop with ignoring return code of script.  And I think in this case will better to run all scripts.

Well, apparently output != NULL is not enough to tell whether we can
stop or not. For instance: qemuProcessStartHook() which is called when a
domain is starting up. The output is NULL (the script can't change the
domain XML), but if it fails the start of the domain is aborted.

But that leads me to think that maybe after all we should run all hook
scripts and report failure if either of them failed. Because of
instance, if I have two hook scripts, one sets up one resource for the
domain, the other sets up some other resource for the domain; and both
of them would be run on domain startup I want them both to run on domain
shutdown to release the resources.
But, if say the first script fails on domain startup, so the startup
process is aborted, qemuProcessStop() is called which executes both
scripts again. I mean, we would not have paired "prepare" and "release"
calls for both scripts.

We can declare that hook scripts have to take care of that and to some
extend they already are doing so, because even now, with one hook script
per driver the "release" implementation must cope with unbalanced call,
because if domain start up fails slightly earlier, before "prepare" is
called, then "release" is called anyway.

Michal