[edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R posted 1 patch 4 years, 1 month ago
Failed in applying to current master (apply log)
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R 4 years, 1 month ago
Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#55317): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/55317
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by Yao, Jiewen 4 years, 1 month ago
Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#55280): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/55280
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by Lohr, Paul A 3 years, 9 months ago
Hello,

It seems this did not get checked in.  Is there something wrong with the patch itself?  Or was this simply submitted incorrectly?  I don't see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask.

Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling
512.239.9073 (cell)
512.794.5044 (work)

From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#61983): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/61983
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by Liming Gao 3 years, 9 months ago
Paul:
  This patch is missing to be merged.

Lorena:
  I can't extract the patch from the mail. Can you send the patch to me? I can help merge it.

Thanks
Liming
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Lohr, Paul A
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:56 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hello,

It seems this did not get checked in.  Is there something wrong with the patch itself?  Or was this simply submitted incorrectly?  I don't see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask.

Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling
512.239.9073 (cell)
512.794.5044 (work)

From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#62002): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/62002
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R 3 years, 9 months ago
Hi Liming,
I've attached the patch

Thanks,
Lorena

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:54 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Paul:
  This patch is missing to be merged.

Lorena:
  I can't extract the patch from the mail. Can you send the patch to me? I can help merge it.

Thanks
Liming
From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Lohr, Paul A
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:56 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hello,

It seems this did not get checked in.  Is there something wrong with the patch itself?  Or was this simply submitted incorrectly?  I don't see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask.

Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling
512.239.9073 (cell)
512.794.5044 (work)

From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#62100): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/62100
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

From 8ffa05d0413571c1718a2b0fa6f883fddd7e02b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lorena de leon <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:17:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com
---
 .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
 .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index fcff0925b8..a93bb65511 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (
 
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
 
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
 
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index ee8c9e3ad2..d9fe470c4c 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (
 
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
 
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
 
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
-- 
2.21.0.windows.1

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by Liming Gao 3 years, 9 months ago
Lorena:
  I have one minor comment on this patch. The error return status should be EFI_UNSUPPORTED.

+      return error;
==>
return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;

Thanks
Liming
From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 1:24 AM
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hi Liming,
I've attached the patch

Thanks,
Lorena

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:54 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Paul:
  This patch is missing to be merged.

Lorena:
  I can't extract the patch from the mail. Can you send the patch to me? I can help merge it.

Thanks
Liming
From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Lohr, Paul A
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:56 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hello,

It seems this did not get checked in.  Is there something wrong with the patch itself?  Or was this simply submitted incorrectly?  I don't see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask.

Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling
512.239.9073 (cell)
512.794.5044 (work)

From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#62305): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/62305
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by De Leon Vasquez, Lorena R 3 years, 9 months ago
I've attached patch with modifications suggested

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:45 AM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Lorena:
  I have one minor comment on this patch. The error return status should be EFI_UNSUPPORTED.

+      return error;
==>
return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;

Thanks
Liming
From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 1:24 AM
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hi Liming,
I've attached the patch

Thanks,
Lorena

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:54 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Paul:
  This patch is missing to be merged.

Lorena:
  I can't extract the patch from the mail. Can you send the patch to me? I can help merge it.

Thanks
Liming
From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Lohr, Paul A
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:56 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hello,

It seems this did not get checked in.  Is there something wrong with the patch itself?  Or was this simply submitted incorrectly?  I don't see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask.

Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling
512.239.9073 (cell)
512.794.5044 (work)

From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#63453): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63453
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

From 447bbaa6b8608787f32e45b7dccfae02dc913968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lorena de leon <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:16:47 -0500
Subject: [Patch V2] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2401

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vasquez@intel.com
---
 .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
 .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index fcff0925b8..201d663d8f 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (
 
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
 
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
 
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index ee8c9e3ad2..f1be73885a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (
 
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
 
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
 
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
-- 
2.21.0.windows.1

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by Liming Gao 3 years, 9 months ago
Lorena:
  Thanks for your update. Can you correct name style as Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com> for below message?

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

Thanks
Liming
From: De Leon Vasquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vasquez@intel.com>
Sent: 2020年7月29日 23:23
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

I’ve attached patch with modifications suggested

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:45 AM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Lorena:
  I have one minor comment on this patch. The error return status should be EFI_UNSUPPORTED.

+      return error;
==>
return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;

Thanks
Liming
From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 1:24 AM
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hi Liming,
I’ve attached the patch

Thanks,
Lorena

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:54 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Paul:
  This patch is missing to be merged.

Lorena:
  I can’t extract the patch from the mail. Can you send the patch to me? I can help merge it.

Thanks
Liming
From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Lohr, Paul A
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:56 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hello,

It seems this did not get checked in.  Is there something wrong with the patch itself?  Or was this simply submitted incorrectly?  I don’t see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask.

Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling
512.239.9073 (cell)
512.794.5044 (work)

From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#63551): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63551
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix
Posted by De Leon Vasquez, Lorena R 3 years, 8 months ago
Hi Liming,
I’ve update the name
Thanks,
Lorena

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 2:30 AM
To: De Leon Vasquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vasquez@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Lorena:
  Thanks for your update. Can you correct name style as Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>> for below message?

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

Thanks
Liming
From: De Leon Vasquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vasquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vasquez@intel.com>>
Sent: 2020年7月29日 23:23
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

I’ve attached patch with modifications suggested

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:45 AM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Lorena:
  I have one minor comment on this patch. The error return status should be EFI_UNSUPPORTED.

+      return error;
==>
return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;

Thanks
Liming
From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 1:24 AM
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hi Liming,
I’ve attached the patch

Thanks,
Lorena

From: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:54 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Lohr, Paul A <paul.a.lohr@intel.com<mailto:paul.a.lohr@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Paul:
  This patch is missing to be merged.

Lorena:
  I can’t extract the patch from the mail. Can you send the patch to me? I can help merge it.

Thanks
Liming
From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Lohr, Paul A
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:56 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Hello,

It seems this did not get checked in.  Is there something wrong with the patch itself?  Or was this simply submitted incorrectly?  I don’t see a Bugzilla associated with it is why I ask.

Paul A. Lohr - Server Firmware Enabling
512.239.9073 (cell)
512.794.5044 (work)

From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 5:46 PM
To: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>

From: De Leon Vazquez, Lorena R <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:04 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

Suggested-by: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com<mailto:lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>

--
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
.../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index cc970c0..61fbb4a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index 0da1611..6bd31b7 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (

     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));

-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return error;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }

   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
--
2.21.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#63764): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63764
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71688474/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

From 1326deb9c1d035b9b815f11aa052f7d4a5066585 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lorena de leon <lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:05:02 -0500
Subject: [Patch V3] IntelSiliconPkg: IOMMU generic bug fix

Looks like Addresswidth is BIT wise values. Right now these values are not used any

BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2401

Suggested-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: lorena.r.de.leon.vazquez@intel.com
---
 .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c        | 11 ++++-------
 .../Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c      | 11 ++++-------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
index fcff0925b8..201d663d8f 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTable.c
@@ -128,14 +128,11 @@ CreateContextEntry (
 
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"Source: S%04x B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
 
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
 
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].RootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
index ee8c9e3ad2..f1be73885a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/TranslationTableEx.c
@@ -78,14 +78,11 @@ CreateExtContextEntry (
 
     DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"DOMAIN: S%04x, B%02x D%02x F%02x\n", mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].Segment, SourceId.Bits.Bus, SourceId.Bits.Device, SourceId.Bits.Function));
 
-    switch (mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW) {
-    case BIT1:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x1;
-      break;
-    case BIT2:
-      ExtContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
-      break;
+    if ((mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].CapReg.Bits.SAGAW & BIT2) == 0) {
+      DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!! 4-level page-table is not supported on VTD %d !!!!\n", VtdIndex));
+      return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
     }
+    ContextEntry->Bits.AddressWidth = 0x2;
   }
 
   FlushPageTableMemory (VtdIndex, (UINTN)mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].ExtRootEntryTable, EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(EntryTablePages));
-- 
2.21.0.windows.1