Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
BIOS should keep MADT ordering by big core first then small core
Signed-off-by: JackX Lin <JackX.Lin@intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Isaac Oram <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Donald Kuo <Donald.Kuo@intel.com>
Cc: Chandana C Kumar <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: JackX Lin <JackX.Lin@intel.com>
---
Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
index 6e57b638e0..894790f246 100644
--- a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
+++ b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ typedef struct {
UINT32 Flags;
UINT32 SocketNum;
UINT32 Thread;
+ UINT8 CpuCoreType;
} EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP;
//
@@ -131,6 +132,49 @@ AppendCpuMapTableEntry (
}
+/**
+ Function will go through all processors to identify Core or Atom
+ by checking Core Type and update in IsBigCore.
+
+ @param[in] CpuApicIdOrderTable Point to a buffer which will be filled in Core type information.
+**/
+VOID
+STATIC
+EFIAPI
+CollectCpuCoreType (
+ IN EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuApicIdOrderTable
+ )
+{
+ CPUID_STRUCTURED_EXTENDED_FEATURE_FLAGS_EDX Edx;
+ UINT32 Eax;
+ UINTN ApNumber;
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINT8 CoreType;
+
+ Status = mMpService->WhoAmI (
+ mMpService,
+ &ApNumber
+ );
+ ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+
+ ///
+ /// Check Hetero feature is supported
+ /// with CPUID.(EAX=7,ECX=0):EDX[15]=1
+ ///
+ AsmCpuidEx (CPUID_STRUCTURED_EXTENDED_FEATURE_FLAGS, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, &Edx.Uint32);
+ if (Edx.Bits.Hybrid == 1) {
+ //
+ // Check which is the running core by reading CPUID.(EAX=1AH, ECX=00H):EAX
+ //
+ AsmCpuid (CPUID_HYBRID_INFORMATION, &Eax, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ CoreType = (UINT8) ((Eax & 0xFF000000) >> 24);
+ } else {
+ CoreType = CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_CORE;
+ }
+
+ CpuApicIdOrderTable[ApNumber].CpuCoreType = CoreType;
+}
+
/**
Collect all processors information and create a Cpu Apic Id table.
@@ -138,7 +182,7 @@ AppendCpuMapTableEntry (
**/
EFI_STATUS
CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
- IN EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuApicIdOrderTable
+ IN EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuApicIdOrderTable
)
{
EFI_STATUS Status;
@@ -146,9 +190,24 @@ CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
UINT32 Index;
UINT32 CurrProcessor;
EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuIdMapPtr;
+ EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *TempCpuApicIdOrderTable;
UINT32 Socket;
- Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
+ TempCpuApicIdOrderTable = AllocateZeroPool (mNumberOfCpus * sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
+ if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable == NULL) {
+ return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
+ }
+
+ CollectCpuCoreType (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable);
+ mMpService->StartupAllAPs (
+ mMpService, // This
+ (EFI_AP_PROCEDURE) CollectCpuCoreType, // Procedure
+ TRUE, // SingleThread
+ NULL, // WaitEvent
+ 0, // TimeoutInMicrosecsond
+ TempCpuApicIdOrderTable, // ProcedureArgument
+ NULL // FailedCpuList
+ );
for (CurrProcessor = 0, Index = 0; CurrProcessor < mNumberOfCpus; CurrProcessor++, Index++) {
Status = mMpService->GetProcessorInfo (
@@ -157,9 +216,9 @@ CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
&ProcessorInfoBuffer
);
- CpuIdMapPtr = (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) &CpuApicIdOrderTable[Index];
+ CpuIdMapPtr = (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index];
if ((ProcessorInfoBuffer.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) != 0) {
- CpuIdMapPtr->ApicId = (UINT32)ProcessorInfoBuffer.ProcessorId;
+ CpuIdMapPtr->ApicId = (UINT32) ProcessorInfoBuffer.ProcessorId;
CpuIdMapPtr->Thread = ProcessorInfoBuffer.Location.Thread;
CpuIdMapPtr->Flags = ((ProcessorInfoBuffer.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) != 0);
CpuIdMapPtr->SocketNum = ProcessorInfoBuffer.Location.Package;
@@ -184,22 +243,60 @@ CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
//
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "BspApicId - 0x%x\n", GetApicId ()));
-
//
// Fill in AcpiProcessorUid.
//
for (Socket = 0; Socket < FixedPcdGet32 (PcdMaxCpuSocketCount); Socket++) {
for (CurrProcessor = 0, Index = 0; CurrProcessor < mNumberOfCpus; CurrProcessor++) {
- if (CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].Flags && (CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum == Socket)) {
- CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].AcpiProcessorUid = (CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum << mNumOfBitShift) + Index;
+ if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].Flags && (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum == Socket)) {
+ TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].AcpiProcessorUid = (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum << mNumOfBitShift) + Index;
Index++;
}
}
}
+ //
+ // Re-ordering Cpu cores information to CpuApicIdOrderTable
+ // by big core first, then small core.
+ //
+ for (Index = 0, CurrProcessor = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
+ if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType == CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_CORE) {
+ CopyMem (&CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
+ CurrProcessor++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
+ if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType == CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_ATOM) {
+ CopyMem (&CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
+ CurrProcessor++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ //
+ // Add unknown cpu core types to the bottom of the table
+ //
+ for (Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
+ if ((TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType != CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_CORE) && (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType != CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_ATOM)) {
+ DEBUG ((
+ DEBUG_INFO,
+ "Unknown Cpu Core type found: Apic = 0x%x, CoreType = 0x%x\n",
+ TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].ApicId,
+ TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType
+ ));
+
+ CopyMem (&CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
+ CurrProcessor++;
+ }
+ }
+
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "::ACPI:: APIC ID Order Table Init. mNumOfBitShift = %x\n", mNumOfBitShift));
DebugDisplayReOrderTable (CpuApicIdOrderTable);
+ if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable != NULL) {
+ FreePool (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable);
+ }
+
return Status;
}
--
2.32.0.windows.2
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#96464): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96464
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95059445/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 6:01 AM JackX Lin <JackX.Lin@intel.com> wrote: > BIOS should keep MADT ordering by big core first then small core > Hi Jack, Can you please elaborate why this is required? AFAIK nowhere in the ACPI spec does it say you need to order by big-little cores. Is this some sort of regression for a specific OS? A useful commit message and/or some comments would be really useful here for posterity. Thanks, Pedro Falcato -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#96473): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96473 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95059445/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi Pedro, Yes, it is for some specific test tools. There are different performance between CPU cores, and the big cores are better than small cores. Some legacy tools are executing with the highest performance CPU cores, In early CPU design, it is usually the first one. We have to put them at the front of all CPU cores, otherwise some tests cannot pass. Due to avoid this happened, we need to ensure CPU cores are ordered by big core first. Best regards Jack From: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 10:09 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Lin, JackX <jackx.lin@intel.com> Cc: Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Kuo, Donald <donald.kuo@intel.com>; Kumar, Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms: PATCH] BIOS needs to present cores in order of relative performance in MADT On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 6:01 AM JackX Lin <JackX.Lin@intel.com<mailto:JackX.Lin@intel.com>> wrote: BIOS should keep MADT ordering by big core first then small core Hi Jack, Can you please elaborate why this is required? AFAIK nowhere in the ACPI spec does it say you need to order by big-little cores. Is this some sort of regression for a specific OS? A useful commit message and/or some comments would be really useful here for posterity. Thanks, Pedro Falcato -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#96490): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96490 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95059445/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 8:35 AM Lin, JackX <jackx.lin@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > > > Yes, it is for some specific test tools. > > > > There are different performance between CPU cores, and the big cores are > better than small cores. > > Some legacy tools are executing with the highest performance CPU cores, In > early CPU design, it is usually the first one. > > > > We have to put them at the front of all CPU cores, otherwise some tests > cannot pass. > > Due to avoid this happened, we need to ensure CPU cores are ordered by big > core first. > Thank you for the thorough description. Could you please (or whoever is pushing this) add this to the commit message? I've been following the evolution of this specific file over the last few months with mild interest and getting things properly documented should be pretty important! Might help avoid any future breakage too :D Thanks, Pedro -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#96500): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96500 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95059445/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pedro. Thanks for the comments. I agree that detailed commit message helps to explain that this MADT order change is to help some legacy APPs that assume the high performance cores are before low performance ones in MADT and use OS APIs to explicitly request running on certain target cpu cores to get higher APP performance. Thanks, Ray From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Pedro Falcato Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2022 3:11 AM To: Lin, JackX <jackx.lin@intel.com> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Kuo, Donald <donald.kuo@intel.com>; Kumar, Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms: PATCH] BIOS needs to present cores in order of relative performance in MADT On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 8:35 AM Lin, JackX <jackx.lin@intel.com<mailto:jackx.lin@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Pedro, Yes, it is for some specific test tools. There are different performance between CPU cores, and the big cores are better than small cores. Some legacy tools are executing with the highest performance CPU cores, In early CPU design, it is usually the first one. We have to put them at the front of all CPU cores, otherwise some tests cannot pass. Due to avoid this happened, we need to ensure CPU cores are ordered by big core first. Thank you for the thorough description. Could you please (or whoever is pushing this) add this to the commit message? I've been following the evolution of this specific file over the last few months with mild interest and getting things properly documented should be pretty important! Might help avoid any future breakage too :D Thanks, Pedro -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#96529): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96529 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95059445/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of JackX Lin
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 10:01 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Lin, JackX <jackx.lin@intel.com>; Lin, JackX <jackx.lin@intel.com>; Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>;
> Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Kuo, Donald <donald.kuo@intel.com>; Kumar, Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms: PATCH] BIOS needs to present cores in order of relative performance in MADT
>
> BIOS should keep MADT ordering by big core first then small core
>
> Signed-off-by: JackX Lin <JackX.Lin@intel.com>
> Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> Cc: Isaac Oram <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Donald Kuo <Donald.Kuo@intel.com>
> Cc: Chandana C Kumar <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
> Cc: JackX Lin <JackX.Lin@intel.com>
> ---
> Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c | 111
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
> b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
> index 6e57b638e0..894790f246 100644
> --- a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
> +++ b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ typedef struct {
> UINT32 Flags;
> UINT32 SocketNum;
> UINT32 Thread;
> + UINT8 CpuCoreType;
> } EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP;
>
> //
> @@ -131,6 +132,49 @@ AppendCpuMapTableEntry (
>
> }
>
> +/**
> + Function will go through all processors to identify Core or Atom
> + by checking Core Type and update in IsBigCore.
> +
> + @param[in] CpuApicIdOrderTable Point to a buffer which will be filled in Core type information.
> +**/
> +VOID
> +STATIC
> +EFIAPI
> +CollectCpuCoreType (
> + IN EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuApicIdOrderTable
> + )
> +{
> + CPUID_STRUCTURED_EXTENDED_FEATURE_FLAGS_EDX Edx;
> + UINT32 Eax;
> + UINTN ApNumber;
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + UINT8 CoreType;
> +
> + Status = mMpService->WhoAmI (
> + mMpService,
> + &ApNumber
> + );
> + ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + ///
> + /// Check Hetero feature is supported
> + /// with CPUID.(EAX=7,ECX=0):EDX[15]=1
> + ///
> + AsmCpuidEx (CPUID_STRUCTURED_EXTENDED_FEATURE_FLAGS, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, &Edx.Uint32);
> + if (Edx.Bits.Hybrid == 1) {
> + //
> + // Check which is the running core by reading CPUID.(EAX=1AH, ECX=00H):EAX
> + //
> + AsmCpuid (CPUID_HYBRID_INFORMATION, &Eax, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + CoreType = (UINT8) ((Eax & 0xFF000000) >> 24);
> + } else {
> + CoreType = CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_CORE;
> + }
> +
> + CpuApicIdOrderTable[ApNumber].CpuCoreType = CoreType;
> +}
> +
> /**
> Collect all processors information and create a Cpu Apic Id table.
>
> @@ -138,7 +182,7 @@ AppendCpuMapTableEntry (
> **/
> EFI_STATUS
> CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
> - IN EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuApicIdOrderTable
> + IN EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuApicIdOrderTable
> )
> {
> EFI_STATUS Status;
> @@ -146,9 +190,24 @@ CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
> UINT32 Index;
> UINT32 CurrProcessor;
> EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *CpuIdMapPtr;
> + EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *TempCpuApicIdOrderTable;
> UINT32 Socket;
>
> - Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
> + TempCpuApicIdOrderTable = AllocateZeroPool (mNumberOfCpus * sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
> + if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable == NULL) {
> + return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> + }
> +
> + CollectCpuCoreType (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable);
> + mMpService->StartupAllAPs (
> + mMpService, // This
> + (EFI_AP_PROCEDURE) CollectCpuCoreType, // Procedure
> + TRUE, // SingleThread
> + NULL, // WaitEvent
> + 0, // TimeoutInMicrosecsond
> + TempCpuApicIdOrderTable, // ProcedureArgument
> + NULL // FailedCpuList
> + );
>
> for (CurrProcessor = 0, Index = 0; CurrProcessor < mNumberOfCpus; CurrProcessor++, Index++) {
> Status = mMpService->GetProcessorInfo (
> @@ -157,9 +216,9 @@ CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
> &ProcessorInfoBuffer
> );
>
> - CpuIdMapPtr = (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) &CpuApicIdOrderTable[Index];
> + CpuIdMapPtr = (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index];
> if ((ProcessorInfoBuffer.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) != 0) {
> - CpuIdMapPtr->ApicId = (UINT32)ProcessorInfoBuffer.ProcessorId;
> + CpuIdMapPtr->ApicId = (UINT32) ProcessorInfoBuffer.ProcessorId;
> CpuIdMapPtr->Thread = ProcessorInfoBuffer.Location.Thread;
> CpuIdMapPtr->Flags = ((ProcessorInfoBuffer.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) != 0);
> CpuIdMapPtr->SocketNum = ProcessorInfoBuffer.Location.Package;
> @@ -184,22 +243,60 @@ CreateCpuLocalApicInTable (
> //
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "BspApicId - 0x%x\n", GetApicId ()));
>
> -
> //
> // Fill in AcpiProcessorUid.
> //
> for (Socket = 0; Socket < FixedPcdGet32 (PcdMaxCpuSocketCount); Socket++) {
> for (CurrProcessor = 0, Index = 0; CurrProcessor < mNumberOfCpus; CurrProcessor++) {
> - if (CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].Flags && (CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum == Socket)) {
> - CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].AcpiProcessorUid = (CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum <<
> mNumOfBitShift) + Index;
> + if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].Flags && (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum == Socket)) {
> + TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].AcpiProcessorUid = (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor].SocketNum <<
> mNumOfBitShift) + Index;
> Index++;
> }
> }
> }
>
> + //
> + // Re-ordering Cpu cores information to CpuApicIdOrderTable
> + // by big core first, then small core.
> + //
> + for (Index = 0, CurrProcessor = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
> + if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType == CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_CORE) {
> + CopyMem (&CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
> + CurrProcessor++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for (Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
> + if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType == CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_ATOM) {
> + CopyMem (&CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
> + CurrProcessor++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + //
> + // Add unknown cpu core types to the bottom of the table
> + //
> + for (Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
> + if ((TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType != CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_CORE) &&
> (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType != CPUID_CORE_TYPE_INTEL_ATOM)) {
> + DEBUG ((
> + DEBUG_INFO,
> + "Unknown Cpu Core type found: Apic = 0x%x, CoreType = 0x%x\n",
> + TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].ApicId,
> + TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].CpuCoreType
> + ));
> +
> + CopyMem (&CpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
> + CurrProcessor++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "::ACPI:: APIC ID Order Table Init. mNumOfBitShift = %x\n", mNumOfBitShift));
> DebugDisplayReOrderTable (CpuApicIdOrderTable);
>
> + if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable != NULL) {
> + FreePool (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable);
> + }
> +
> return Status;
> }
>
> --
> 2.32.0.windows.2
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#96465): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96465
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95059445/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
© 2016 - 2023 Red Hat, Inc.