Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3459
This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type.
The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation
except the difference between load vs store instruction formats.
Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com>
Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>
---
BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644
--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
+++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
@@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 (
Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20));
break;
+ case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S:
+ if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) {
+ int i;
+ Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20));
+
+ Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5);
+ Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5)));
+
+ if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) {
+ Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1);
+ }
+ Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex];
+
+ if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) {
+ i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096);
+ Value2 -= i;
+ Value += 4096 * i;
+ if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) {
+ Value2 -= 1;
+ Value += 4096;
+ }
+ }
+ else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) {
+ i = (Value / 4096);
+ Value2 += i;
+ Value -= 4096 * i;
+ if(2047 < (INT32)Value) {
+ Value2 += 1;
+ Value -= 4096;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Update the IMM of SD instruction
+ //
+ // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 0|
+ // |-------------------------------------------|-------|
+ // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode|
+ // ---------------------------------------------------
+
+ // First Zero out current IMM
+ *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80;
+
+ // Update with new IMM
+ *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25);
+ *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7);
+
+ // Update previous instruction
+ *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12));
+ }
+ mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL;
+ mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL;
+ mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0;
+ break;
+
case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I:
if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) {
int i;
@@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 (
case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20:
case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20:
case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I:
+ case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S:
break;
default:
--
2.32.0
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#77663): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77663
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84108362/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi Sunil, Thanks a lot for this patch. I confirm that it fixes the issue I raised in BZ3459. If anyone is interested, you can find builds of the RISC-V NTFS driver, where this patch has been applied, in the artefacts of https://github.com/pbatard/ntfs-3g/actions/runs/1022633741. With this: On 2021.07.10 07:31, Sunil V L wrote: > Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 > > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type. > The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation > except the difference between load vs store instruction formats. > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com> > Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com> > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > --- > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644 > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > @@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 ( > Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > break; > > > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > + if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > + int i; > > + Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > + > > + Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5); > > + Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5))); > > + > > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) { > > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1); > > + } > > + Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex]; > > + > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > + i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096); > > + Value2 -= i; > > + Value += 4096 * i; > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > + Value2 -= 1; > > + Value += 4096; > > + } > > + } > > + else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > + i = (Value / 4096); > > + Value2 += i; > > + Value -= 4096 * i; > > + if(2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > + Value2 += 1; > > + Value -= 4096; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + // Update the IMM of SD instruction > > + // > > + // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 0| > > + // |-------------------------------------------|-------| > > + // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode| > > + // --------------------------------------------------- > > + > > + // First Zero out current IMM > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80; > > + > > + // Update with new IMM > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25); > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7); > > + > > + // Update previous instruction > > + *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12)); > > + } > > + mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL; > > + mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL; > > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0; > > + break; > > + > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > int i; > > @@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 ( > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20: > > case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20: > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > break; > > > > default: > Tested-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#77694): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77694 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84108362/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Acked-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > 发送时间: 2021年7月10日 14:31 > 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io > 抄送: sunil.vl@gmail.com; Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>; Liming Gao > <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Yuwei Chen > <yuwei.chen@intel.com>; Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>; Abner Chang > <abner.chang@hpe.com>; Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > 主题: [PATCH] BaseTools GenFw: Add support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S > relocation > > Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 > > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type. > The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation > except the difference between load vs store instruction formats. > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com> > Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com> > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > --- > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644 > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > @@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 ( > Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > break; > > > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > + if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > + int i; > > + Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > + > > + Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5); > > + Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5))); > > + > > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) { > > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1); > > + } > > + Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + > mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex]; > > + > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > + i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096); > > + Value2 -= i; > > + Value += 4096 * i; > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > + Value2 -= 1; > > + Value += 4096; > > + } > > + } > > + else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > + i = (Value / 4096); > > + Value2 += i; > > + Value -= 4096 * i; > > + if(2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > + Value2 += 1; > > + Value -= 4096; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + // Update the IMM of SD instruction > > + // > > + // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 0| > > + // |-------------------------------------------|-------| > > + // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode| > > + // --------------------------------------------------- > > + > > + // First Zero out current IMM > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80; > > + > > + // Update with new IMM > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25); > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7); > > + > > + // Update previous instruction > > + *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | > (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12)); > > + } > > + mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL; > > + mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL; > > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0; > > + break; > > + > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > int i; > > @@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 ( > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20: > > case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20: > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > break; > > > > default: > > -- > 2.32.0 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#77699): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77699 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84153453/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Acked-by: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Sunil V L [mailto:sunilvl@ventanamicro.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2021 2:31 PM > To: devel@edk2.groups.io > Cc: sunil.vl@gmail.com; Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>; Liming Gao > <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Yuwei > Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com>; Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>; Chang, Abner > (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <abner.chang@hpe.com>; Schaefer, Daniel > <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools GenFw: Add support for > R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation > > Ref: > INVALID URI REMOVED > d=3459__;!!NpxR!zrGTHXfzHm6WE6VZ2rABQ0yFTgu7frG5J213efKk- > TmOGcp_9TSXv8E3b_XlNzo$ > > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type. > The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation > except the difference between load vs store instruction formats. > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com> > Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com> > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > --- > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644 > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > @@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 ( > Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > break; > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > + if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > + int i; > + Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > + > + Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5); > + Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5))); > + > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) { > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1); > + } > + Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + > mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex]; > + > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > + i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096); > + Value2 -= i; > + Value += 4096 * i; > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > + Value2 -= 1; > + Value += 4096; > + } > + } > + else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) { > + i = (Value / 4096); > + Value2 += i; > + Value -= 4096 * i; > + if(2047 < (INT32)Value) { > + Value2 += 1; > + Value -= 4096; > + } > + } > + > + // Update the IMM of SD instruction > + // > + // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 0| > + // |-------------------------------------------|-------| > + // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode| > + // --------------------------------------------------- > + > + // First Zero out current IMM > + *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80; > + > + // Update with new IMM > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25); > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7); > + > + // Update previous instruction > + *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | > (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12)); > + } > + mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL; > + mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL; > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0; > + break; > + > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > int i; > @@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 ( > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20: > case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20: > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > break; > > default: > -- > 2.32.0 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#77726): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77726 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84108362/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Looks good. I compared it with existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I and looked at the differences. This one doesn't do use mRiscVPass1GotFixup. I assume this is an optimization that's not possible here? Haven't tested that it works but since it works for Pete: Reviewed-by: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> Thanks! On 7/10/21 2:31 PM, Sunil V L wrote: > Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 > > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type. > The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation > except the difference between load vs store instruction formats. > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com> > Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com> > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > --- > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644 > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > @@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 ( > Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > break; > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > + if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > + int i; > + Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > + > + Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5); > + Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5))); > + > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) { > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1); > + } > + Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex]; > + > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > + i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096); > + Value2 -= i; > + Value += 4096 * i; > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > + Value2 -= 1; > + Value += 4096; > + } > + } > + else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) { > + i = (Value / 4096); > + Value2 += i; > + Value -= 4096 * i; > + if(2047 < (INT32)Value) { > + Value2 += 1; > + Value -= 4096; > + } > + } > + > + // Update the IMM of SD instruction > + // > + // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 0| > + // |-------------------------------------------|-------| > + // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode| > + // --------------------------------------------------- > + > + // First Zero out current IMM > + *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80; > + > + // Update with new IMM > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25); > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7); > + > + // Update previous instruction > + *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12)); > + } > + mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL; > + mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL; > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0; > + break; > + > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > int i; > @@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 ( > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20: > case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20: > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > break; > > default: > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#77744): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77744 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84108362/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:27:30PM +0800, Daniel Schaefer wrote: > Looks good. I compared it with existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I and looked at > the differences. > Thanks Daniel. > This one doesn't do use mRiscVPass1GotFixup. > I assume this is an optimization that's not possible here? GOT fixup is required only for load to avoid the indirection for symbol resolution. Thanks Sunil > > Haven't tested that it works but since it works for Pete: > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > > Thanks! > > On 7/10/21 2:31 PM, Sunil V L wrote: > > Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 > > > > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type. > > The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation > > except the difference between load vs store instruction formats. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > > > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com> > > Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> > > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com> > > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > > --- > > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > > index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644 > > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > > @@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 ( > > Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > break; > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > + if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > + int i; > > + Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > + > > + Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5); > > + Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5))); > > + > > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) { > > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1); > > + } > > + Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex]; > > + > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > + i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096); > > + Value2 -= i; > > + Value += 4096 * i; > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > + Value2 -= 1; > > + Value += 4096; > > + } > > + } > > + else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > + i = (Value / 4096); > > + Value2 += i; > > + Value -= 4096 * i; > > + if(2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > + Value2 += 1; > > + Value -= 4096; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + // Update the IMM of SD instruction > > + // > > + // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 0| > > + // |-------------------------------------------|-------| > > + // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode| > > + // --------------------------------------------------- > > + > > + // First Zero out current IMM > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80; > > + > > + // Update with new IMM > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25); > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7); > > + > > + // Update previous instruction > > + *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12)); > > + } > > + mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL; > > + mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL; > > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0; > > + break; > > + > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > int i; > > @@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 ( > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20: > > case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20: > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > break; > > default: > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#77800): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77800 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84108362/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Acked-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > 发送时间: 2021年7月13日 18:14 > 收件人: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > 抄送: devel@edk2.groups.io; sunil.vl@gmail.com; Liming Gao > <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Yuwei Chen > <yuwei.chen@intel.com>; Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>; Abner Chang > <abner.chang@hpe.com> > 主题: Re: [PATCH] BaseTools GenFw: Add support for > R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:27:30PM +0800, Daniel Schaefer wrote: > > Looks good. I compared it with existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I and looked > at > > the differences. > > > Thanks Daniel. > > > This one doesn't do use mRiscVPass1GotFixup. > > I assume this is an optimization that's not possible here? > > GOT fixup is required only for load to avoid the indirection for symbol > resolution. > > Thanks > Sunil > > > > Haven't tested that it works but since it works for Pete: > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > > > > Thanks! > > > > On 7/10/21 2:31 PM, Sunil V L wrote: > > > Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 > > > > > > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S relocation type. > > > The logic is same as existing R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I relocation > > > except the difference between load vs store instruction formats. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > > > > > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn> > > > Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com> > > > Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com> > > > Cc: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> > > > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com> > > > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com> > > > --- > > > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 55 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > > > index 3d7e20aaff..0bb3ead228 100644 > > > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > > > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c > > > @@ -557,6 +557,60 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 ( > > > Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > > break; > > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > > + if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > > + int i; > > > + Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20)); > > > + > > > + Value = ((UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 25, 7)) << 5); > > > + Value = (Value | (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 7, 5))); > > > + > > > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) { > > > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1); > > > + } > > > + Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + > mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex]; > > > + > > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > > + i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096); > > > + Value2 -= i; > > > + Value += 4096 * i; > > > + if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) { > > > + Value2 -= 1; > > > + Value += 4096; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + else if( 2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > > + i = (Value / 4096); > > > + Value2 += i; > > > + Value -= 4096 * i; > > > + if(2047 < (INT32)Value) { > > > + Value2 += 1; > > > + Value -= 4096; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + > > > + // Update the IMM of SD instruction > > > + // > > > + // |31 25|24 20|19 15|14 12 |11 7|6 > 0| > > > + // |-------------------------------------------|-------| > > > + // |imm[11:5] | rs2 | rs1 | funct3 |imm[4:0] | opcode| > > > + // --------------------------------------------------- > > > + > > > + // First Zero out current IMM > > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ &= ~0xfe000f80; > > > + > > > + // Update with new IMM > > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 5, 7) << 25); > > > + *(UINT32 *)Targ |= (RV_X(Value, 0, 5) << 7); > > > + > > > + // Update previous instruction > > > + *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | > (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12)); > > > + } > > > + mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL; > > > + mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL; > > > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0; > > > + break; > > > + > > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) { > > > int i; > > > @@ -1587,6 +1641,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 ( > > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20: > > > case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20: > > > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I: > > > + case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S: > > > break; > > > default: > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#77946): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77946 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84327084/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.