On 8/4/25 4:16 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.07.2025 17:58, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>> - Extended p2m_type_t with additional types: p2m_mmio_direct,
>> p2m_grant_map_{rw,ro}.
>> - Added macros to classify memory types: P2M_RAM_TYPES, P2M_GRANT_TYPES.
>> - Introduced helper predicates: p2m_is_ram(), p2m_is_any_ram().
>> - Define p2m_mmio_direct to tell handle_passthrough_prop() from common
>> code how to map device memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko<oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
> Almost ready to be acked, except for ...
>
>> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/p2m.h
>> @@ -62,8 +62,30 @@ struct p2m_domain {
>> typedef enum {
>> p2m_invalid = 0, /* Nothing mapped here */
>> p2m_ram_rw, /* Normal read/write domain RAM */
>> + p2m_mmio_direct_io, /* Read/write mapping of genuine Device MMIO area,
>> + PTE_PBMT_IO will be used for such mappings */
>> + p2m_ext_storage, /* Following types'll be stored outsude PTE bits: */
>> + p2m_grant_map_rw, /* Read/write grant mapping */
>> + p2m_grant_map_ro, /* Read-only grant mapping */
>> } p2m_type_t;
>>
>> +#define p2m_mmio_direct p2m_mmio_direct_io
> ... this (see reply to patch 09).
>
>> +/* We use bitmaps and mask to handle groups of types */
>> +#define p2m_to_mask(t_) BIT(t_, UL)
> I notice that you moved the underscore to the back of the parameters,
> compared to how Arm has it. I wonder though: What use are these
> underscores in the first place, here and below? (There are macros where
> conflicts could arise, but the ones here don't fall in that group,
> afaict.)
Good point, there is really no name conflicts here, so underscore could
be just dropped.
~ Oleksii