[PATCH v2 07/16] xen/riscv: introduce platform_get_irq()

Oleksii Kurochko posted 16 patches 5 months, 4 weeks ago
Only 14 patches received!
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 07/16] xen/riscv: introduce platform_get_irq()
Posted by Oleksii Kurochko 5 months, 4 weeks ago
platform_get_irq() recieves information about device's irq ( type
and irq number ) from device tree node and using this information
update irq descriptor in irq_desc[] array.

Introduce dt_irq_xlate and initialize with aplic_irq_xlate() as
it is used by dt_device_get_irq() which is called by
platform_get_irq().

Co-developed-by: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
---
Changes in V2:
 - Add cf_check for aplic_irq_xlate().
 - Ident label in irq_set_type().
 - Return proper -E... values for platform_get_irq().
---
 xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c           | 20 +++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h |  3 +++
 xen/arch/riscv/irq.c             | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c b/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
index caba8f8993..10ae81f7ac 100644
--- a/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 
 #include <xen/errno.h>
 #include <xen/init.h>
+#include <xen/irq.h>
 #include <xen/sections.h>
 #include <xen/types.h>
 
@@ -21,6 +22,23 @@ static struct intc_info __ro_after_init aplic_info = {
     .hw_version = INTC_APLIC,
 };
 
+static int cf_check aplic_irq_xlate(const uint32_t *intspec,
+                                    unsigned int intsize,
+                                    unsigned int *out_hwirq,
+                                    unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+    if ( intsize < 2 )
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    /* Mapping 1:1 */
+    *out_hwirq = intspec[0];
+
+    if ( out_type )
+        *out_type = intspec[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init aplic_preinit(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *dat)
 {
     if ( aplic_info.node )
@@ -35,6 +53,8 @@ static int __init aplic_preinit(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *dat)
 
     aplic_info.node = node;
 
+    dt_irq_xlate = aplic_irq_xlate;
+
     return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
index f609df466e..6223bbbed5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ static inline void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
     BUG_ON("unimplemented");
 }
 
+struct dt_device_node;
+int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node *device, int index);
+
 void init_IRQ(void);
 
 #endif /* ASM__RISCV__IRQ_H */
diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c b/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c
index 26a8556b2c..4c518bbd97 100644
--- a/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c
@@ -7,11 +7,53 @@
  */
 
 #include <xen/bug.h>
+#include <xen/device_tree.h>
+#include <xen/errno.h>
 #include <xen/init.h>
 #include <xen/irq.h>
 
 static irq_desc_t irq_desc[NR_IRQS];
 
+static bool irq_validate_new_type(unsigned int curr, unsigned int new)
+{
+    return (curr == IRQ_TYPE_INVALID || curr == new );
+}
+
+static int irq_set_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
+{
+    unsigned long flags;
+    struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+    int ret = -EBUSY;
+
+    spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+
+    if ( !irq_validate_new_type(desc->arch.type, type) )
+        goto err;
+
+    desc->arch.type = type;
+
+    ret = 0;
+
+ err:
+    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+
+    return ret;
+}
+
+int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node *device, int index)
+{
+    struct dt_irq dt_irq;
+    int ret;
+
+    if ( (ret = dt_device_get_irq(device, index, &dt_irq)) != 0 )
+        return ret;
+
+    if ( (ret = irq_set_type(dt_irq.irq, dt_irq.type)) != 0 )
+        return ret;
+
+    return dt_irq.irq;
+}
+
 int arch_init_one_irq_desc(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
     desc->arch.type = IRQ_TYPE_INVALID;
-- 
2.49.0
Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] xen/riscv: introduce platform_get_irq()
Posted by Jan Beulich 5 months, 3 weeks ago
On 06.05.2025 18:51, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> platform_get_irq() recieves information about device's irq ( type
> and irq number ) from device tree node and using this information
> update irq descriptor in irq_desc[] array.
> 
> Introduce dt_irq_xlate and initialize with aplic_irq_xlate() as
> it is used by dt_device_get_irq() which is called by
> platform_get_irq().
> 
> Co-developed-by: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
>  - Add cf_check for aplic_irq_xlate().
>  - Ident label in irq_set_type().
>  - Return proper -E... values for platform_get_irq().
> ---
>  xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c           | 20 +++++++++++++++
>  xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h |  3 +++
>  xen/arch/riscv/irq.c             | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c b/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
> index caba8f8993..10ae81f7ac 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  
>  #include <xen/errno.h>
>  #include <xen/init.h>
> +#include <xen/irq.h>
>  #include <xen/sections.h>
>  #include <xen/types.h>
>  
> @@ -21,6 +22,23 @@ static struct intc_info __ro_after_init aplic_info = {
>      .hw_version = INTC_APLIC,
>  };
>  
> +static int cf_check aplic_irq_xlate(const uint32_t *intspec,
> +                                    unsigned int intsize,
> +                                    unsigned int *out_hwirq,
> +                                    unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> +    if ( intsize < 2 )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    /* Mapping 1:1 */
> +    *out_hwirq = intspec[0];
> +
> +    if ( out_type )
> +        *out_type = intspec[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init aplic_preinit(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *dat)
>  {
>      if ( aplic_info.node )
> @@ -35,6 +53,8 @@ static int __init aplic_preinit(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *dat)
>  
>      aplic_info.node = node;
>  
> +    dt_irq_xlate = aplic_irq_xlate;
> +
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
> index f609df466e..6223bbbed5 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ static inline void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
>      BUG_ON("unimplemented");
>  }
>  
> +struct dt_device_node;
> +int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node *device, int index);
> +
>  void init_IRQ(void);
>  
>  #endif /* ASM__RISCV__IRQ_H */
> diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c b/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c
> index 26a8556b2c..4c518bbd97 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/irq.c
> @@ -7,11 +7,53 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <xen/bug.h>
> +#include <xen/device_tree.h>
> +#include <xen/errno.h>
>  #include <xen/init.h>
>  #include <xen/irq.h>
>  
>  static irq_desc_t irq_desc[NR_IRQS];
>  
> +static bool irq_validate_new_type(unsigned int curr, unsigned int new)
> +{
> +    return (curr == IRQ_TYPE_INVALID || curr == new );

Nit: Stray blank. In fact you could omit the parentheses as well.

> +}
> +
> +static int irq_set_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +    unsigned long flags;
> +    struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +    int ret = -EBUSY;
> +
> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> +
> +    if ( !irq_validate_new_type(desc->arch.type, type) )
> +        goto err;
> +
> +    desc->arch.type = type;
> +
> +    ret = 0;
> +
> + err:
> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node *device, int index)
> +{
> +    struct dt_irq dt_irq;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    if ( (ret = dt_device_get_irq(device, index, &dt_irq)) != 0 )
> +        return ret;
> +
> +    if ( (ret = irq_set_type(dt_irq.irq, dt_irq.type)) != 0 )
> +        return ret;
> +
> +    return dt_irq.irq;

What guarantees the value to be at most INT_MAX (i.e. no silent conversion to
a negative value, signaling an error to the caller)? Actually, looking at
irq_set_type(), what guarantees irq_to_desc() there to not overrun irq_desc[]?
There are no bounds checks in aplic_irq_xlate().

Jan
Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] xen/riscv: introduce platform_get_irq()
Posted by Oleksii Kurochko 5 months, 2 weeks ago
On 5/15/25 9:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> +int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node *device, int index)
>> +{
>> +    struct dt_irq dt_irq;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    if ( (ret = dt_device_get_irq(device, index, &dt_irq)) != 0 )
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    if ( (ret = irq_set_type(dt_irq.irq, dt_irq.type)) != 0 )
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    return dt_irq.irq;
> What guarantees the value to be at most INT_MAX (i.e. no silent conversion to
> a negative value, signaling an error to the caller)? Actually, looking at
> irq_set_type(), what guarantees irq_to_desc() there to not overrun irq_desc[]?
> There are no bounds checks in aplic_irq_xlate().

I'm afraid that both aren't guaranteed. I think to have the following in platform_get_irq()
should be enough:
     BUILD_BUG_ON(NR_IRQS > INT_MAX);

     if ( dt_irq.irq >= NR_IRQS )
         panic("irq%d is bigger then NR_IRQS(%d)\n", dt_irq.irq, NR_IRQS);

Probably, the first could be dropped as I'm not sure that anyone will use such big
number for NR_IRQS.

~ Oleksii

Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] xen/riscv: introduce platform_get_irq()
Posted by Jan Beulich 5 months, 2 weeks ago
On 16.05.2025 16:04, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> 
> On 5/15/25 9:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> +int platform_get_irq(const struct dt_device_node *device, int index)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct dt_irq dt_irq;
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +
>>> +    if ( (ret = dt_device_get_irq(device, index, &dt_irq)) != 0 )
>>> +        return ret;
>>> +
>>> +    if ( (ret = irq_set_type(dt_irq.irq, dt_irq.type)) != 0 )
>>> +        return ret;
>>> +
>>> +    return dt_irq.irq;
>> What guarantees the value to be at most INT_MAX (i.e. no silent conversion to
>> a negative value, signaling an error to the caller)? Actually, looking at
>> irq_set_type(), what guarantees irq_to_desc() there to not overrun irq_desc[]?
>> There are no bounds checks in aplic_irq_xlate().
> 
> I'm afraid that both aren't guaranteed. I think to have the following in platform_get_irq()
> should be enough:
>      BUILD_BUG_ON(NR_IRQS > INT_MAX);
> 
>      if ( dt_irq.irq >= NR_IRQS )
>          panic("irq%d is bigger then NR_IRQS(%d)\n", dt_irq.irq, NR_IRQS);
> 
> Probably, the first could be dropped as I'm not sure that anyone will use such big
> number for NR_IRQS.

I'd say better keep it, even if largely for doc purposes.

Jan