[XEN PATCH v5 09/17] xen: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Directive 4.10

Alessandro Zucchelli posted 17 patches 1 month, 3 weeks ago
[XEN PATCH v5 09/17] xen: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Directive 4.10
Posted by Alessandro Zucchelli 1 month, 3 weeks ago
From: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>

Amend inclusion guards to address violations of
MISRA C:2012 Directive 4.10 ("Precautions shall be taken in order
to prevent the contents of a header file being included more than
once").

Inclusion guards must appear at the beginning of the headers
(comments are permitted anywhere) and the #if directive cannot
be used for other checks.

Mechanical change.

Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin  <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
Signed-off-by: Maria Celeste Cesario  <maria.celeste.cesario@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zucchelli <alessandro.zucchelli@bugseng.com>

---
Changes in v5:
- edit inclusion guards, according to the feedback received
Changes in v3:
- remove trailing underscores
- change inclusion guard name to adhere to the new standard
Changes in v2:
- drop changes in xen/include/xen/unaligned.h since this second
  series adds a comment-based deviation in a separate patch
- use #ifndef instead of #if !defined()
---
 xen/include/xen/err.h     | 8 +++++---
 xen/include/xen/pci_ids.h | 5 +++++
 xen/include/xen/softirq.h | 8 +++++---
 xen/include/xen/vmap.h    | 8 +++++---
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/include/xen/err.h b/xen/include/xen/err.h
index cbdd1bf7f8..45988e0cbb 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/err.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/err.h
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-#if !defined(__XEN_ERR_H__) && !defined(__ASSEMBLY__)
-#define __XEN_ERR_H__
+#ifndef XEN__ERR_H
+#define XEN__ERR_H
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
 #include <xen/compiler.h>
 #include <xen/errno.h>
@@ -41,4 +42,5 @@ static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr)
 	return IS_ERR(ptr) ? PTR_ERR(ptr) : 0;
 }
 
-#endif /* __XEN_ERR_H__ */
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+#endif /* XEN__ERR_H */
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/pci_ids.h b/xen/include/xen/pci_ids.h
index e798477a7e..7f74954d6a 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/pci_ids.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/pci_ids.h
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+#ifndef XEN__PCI_IDS_H
+#define XEN__PCI_IDS_H
+
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD                0x1022
 
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA             0x10de
@@ -11,3 +14,5 @@
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM           0x14e4
 
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL              0x8086
+
+#endif /* XEN__PCI_IDS_H */
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/softirq.h b/xen/include/xen/softirq.h
index 33d6f2ecd2..5fd57160df 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/softirq.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/softirq.h
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-#if !defined(__XEN_SOFTIRQ_H__) && !defined(__ASSEMBLY__)
-#define __XEN_SOFTIRQ_H__
+#ifndef XEN__SOFTIRQ_H
+#define XEN__SOFTIRQ_H
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
 /* Low-latency softirqs come first in the following list. */
 enum {
@@ -40,4 +41,5 @@ void cpu_raise_softirq_batch_finish(void);
  */
 void process_pending_softirqs(void);
 
-#endif /* __XEN_SOFTIRQ_H__ */
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+#endif /* XEN__SOFTIRQ_H */
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/vmap.h b/xen/include/xen/vmap.h
index 0c16baa85f..a8475bd05b 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/vmap.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/vmap.h
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-#if !defined(__XEN_VMAP_H__) && defined(VMAP_VIRT_START)
-#define __XEN_VMAP_H__
+#ifndef XEN__VMAP_H
+#define XEN__VMAP_H
+#ifdef VMAP_VIRT_START
 
 #include <xen/mm-frame.h>
 #include <xen/page-size.h>
@@ -42,4 +43,5 @@ static inline void vm_init(void)
     vm_init_type(VMAP_DEFAULT, (void *)VMAP_VIRT_START, arch_vmap_virt_end());
 }
 
-#endif /* __XEN_VMAP_H__ */
+#endif /* VMAP_VIRT_START */
+#endif /* XEN__VMAP_H */
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [XEN PATCH v5 09/17] xen: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Directive 4.10
Posted by Jan Beulich 1 month, 3 weeks ago
On 23.07.2024 10:15, Alessandro Zucchelli wrote:
> From: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
> 
> Amend inclusion guards to address violations of
> MISRA C:2012 Directive 4.10 ("Precautions shall be taken in order
> to prevent the contents of a header file being included more than
> once").
> 
> Inclusion guards must appear at the beginning of the headers
> (comments are permitted anywhere) and the #if directive cannot
> be used for other checks.
> 
> Mechanical change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin  <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maria Celeste Cesario  <maria.celeste.cesario@bugseng.com>
> Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zucchelli <alessandro.zucchelli@bugseng.com>

Provided the description of the scheme itself goes in first:
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - edit inclusion guards, according to the feedback received

Given how exactly the guards look like is the main aspect here, I
question the retaining of earlier R-b with changes like what is said
here.

Jan