Escape the final dot of the comment and extend the search of a
fallthrough comment up to 2 lines after the last statement.
Fixes: a128d8da913b21eff6c6d2e2a7d4c54c054b78db "automation/eclair: add deviations for MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3"
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@bugseng.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- instead of introducing the hypened fallthrough, insert the missing escape.
---
automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
index b8f9155267..9df3e0f0c4 100644
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ safe."
-doc_end
-doc_begin="Switch clauses ending with an explicit comment indicating the fallthrough intention are safe."
--config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(^(?s).*/\\* [fF]all ?through.? \\*/.*$,0..1))))"}
+-config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(^(?s).*/\\* [fF]all ?through\\.? \\*/.*$,0..2))))"}
-doc_end
-doc_begin="Switch statements having a controlling expression of enum type deliberately do not have a default case: gcc -Wall enables -Wswitch which warns (and breaks the build as we use -Werror) if one of the enum labels is missing from the switch."
--
2.34.1