From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
Additionally, this patch introduces macros in fence.h,
which are utilized in atomic.h.
atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n)
were updated to use __*xchg_generic().
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
---
Changes in V4:
- do changes related to the updates of [PATCH v3 13/34] xen/riscv: introduce cmpxchg.h
- drop casts in read_atomic_size(), write_atomic(), add_sized()
- tabs -> spaces
- drop #ifdef CONFIG_SMP ... #endif in fence.ha as it is simpler to handle NR_CPUS=1
the same as NR_CPUS>1 with accepting less than ideal performance.
---
Changes in V3:
- update the commit message
- add SPDX for fence.h
- code style fixes
- Remove /* TODO: ... */ for add_sized macros. It looks correct to me.
- re-order the patch
- merge to this patch fence.h
---
Changes in V2:
- Change an author of commit. I got this header from Bobby's old repo.
---
xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h | 395 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h | 8 +
2 files changed, 403 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h
diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..267d3c0803
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Taken and modified from Linux.
+ *
+ * atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) were updated to use
+ * __*xchg_generic()
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Vates SAS
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H
+#define _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H
+
+#include <xen/atomic.h>
+#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
+#include <asm/fence.h>
+#include <asm/io.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
+
+void __bad_atomic_size(void);
+
+static always_inline void read_atomic_size(const volatile void *p,
+ void *res,
+ unsigned int size)
+{
+ switch ( size )
+ {
+ case 1: *(uint8_t *)res = readb(p); break;
+ case 2: *(uint16_t *)res = readw(p); break;
+ case 4: *(uint32_t *)res = readl(p); break;
+ case 8: *(uint32_t *)res = readq(p); break;
+ default: __bad_atomic_size(); break;
+ }
+}
+
+#define read_atomic(p) ({ \
+ union { typeof(*p) val; char c[0]; } x_; \
+ read_atomic_size(p, x_.c, sizeof(*p)); \
+ x_.val; \
+})
+
+#define write_atomic(p, x) \
+({ \
+ typeof(*p) x__ = (x); \
+ switch ( sizeof(*p) ) \
+ { \
+ case 1: writeb((uint8_t)x__, p); break; \
+ case 2: writew((uint16_t)x__, p); break; \
+ case 4: writel((uint32_t)x__, p); break; \
+ case 8: writeq((uint64_t)x__, p); break; \
+ default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \
+ } \
+ x__; \
+})
+
+#define add_sized(p, x) \
+({ \
+ typeof(*(p)) x__ = (x); \
+ switch ( sizeof(*(p)) ) \
+ { \
+ case 1: writeb(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \
+ case 2: writew(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \
+ case 4: writel(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \
+ default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \
+ } \
+})
+
+/*
+ * __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) - Declare an unqualified scalar type, leaving
+ * non-scalar types unchanged.
+ *
+ * Prefer C11 _Generic for better compile-times and simpler code. Note: 'char'
+ * is not type-compatible with 'signed char', and we define a separate case.
+ */
+#define __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(type) \
+ unsigned type: (unsigned type)0, \
+ signed type: (signed type)0
+
+#define __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) typeof( \
+ _Generic((x), \
+ char: (char)0, \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(char), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(short), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(int), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long), \
+ __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long long), \
+ default: (x)))
+
+#define READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
+#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
+ do { \
+ *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define __atomic_acquire_fence() \
+ __asm__ __volatile__( RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory" )
+
+#define __atomic_release_fence() \
+ __asm__ __volatile__( RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory" );
+
+static inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return READ_ONCE(v->counter);
+}
+
+static inline int _atomic_read(atomic_t v)
+{
+ return v.counter;
+}
+
+static inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(v->counter, i);
+}
+
+static inline void _atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
+{
+ v->counter = i;
+}
+
+static inline int atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return atomic_sub_return(i, v) == 0;
+}
+
+static inline void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ atomic_add(1, v);
+}
+
+static inline int atomic_inc_return(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return atomic_add_return(1, v);
+}
+
+static inline void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ atomic_sub(1, v);
+}
+
+static inline int atomic_dec_return(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return atomic_sub_return(1, v);
+}
+
+static inline int atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return atomic_sub_return(1, v) == 0;
+}
+
+static inline int atomic_add_negative(int i, atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return atomic_add_return(i, v) < 0;
+}
+
+static inline int atomic_inc_and_test(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return atomic_add_return(1, v) == 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * First, the atomic ops that have no ordering constraints and therefor don't
+ * have the AQ or RL bits set. These don't return anything, so there's only
+ * one version to worry about.
+ */
+#define ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op, I, asm_type, c_type, prefix) \
+static inline \
+void atomic##prefix##_##op(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t *v) \
+{ \
+ __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
+ " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type " zero, %1, %0" \
+ : "+A" (v->counter) \
+ : "r" (I) \
+ : "memory" ); \
+} \
+
+#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op, I) \
+ ATOMIC_OP (op, asm_op, I, w, int, )
+
+ATOMIC_OPS(add, add, i)
+ATOMIC_OPS(sub, add, -i)
+ATOMIC_OPS(and, and, i)
+ATOMIC_OPS( or, or, i)
+ATOMIC_OPS(xor, xor, i)
+
+#undef ATOMIC_OP
+#undef ATOMIC_OPS
+
+/*
+ * Atomic ops that have ordered, relaxed, acquire, and release variants.
+ * There's two flavors of these: the arithmatic ops have both fetch and return
+ * versions, while the logical ops only have fetch versions.
+ */
+#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, asm_op, I, asm_type, c_type, prefix) \
+static inline \
+c_type atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op##_relaxed(c_type i, \
+ atomic##prefix##_t *v) \
+{ \
+ register c_type ret; \
+ __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
+ " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type " %1, %2, %0" \
+ : "+A" (v->counter), "=r" (ret) \
+ : "r" (I) \
+ : "memory" ); \
+ return ret; \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_type atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t *v) \
+{ \
+ register c_type ret; \
+ __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
+ " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type ".aqrl %1, %2, %0" \
+ : "+A" (v->counter), "=r" (ret) \
+ : "r" (I) \
+ : "memory" ); \
+ return ret; \
+}
+
+#define ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, asm_op, c_op, I, asm_type, c_type, prefix) \
+static inline \
+c_type atomic##prefix##_##op##_return_relaxed(c_type i, \
+ atomic##prefix##_t *v) \
+{ \
+ return atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op##_relaxed(i, v) c_op I; \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_type atomic##prefix##_##op##_return(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t *v) \
+{ \
+ return atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op(i, v) c_op I; \
+}
+
+#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op, c_op, I) \
+ ATOMIC_FETCH_OP( op, asm_op, I, w, int, ) \
+ ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, asm_op, c_op, I, w, int, )
+
+ATOMIC_OPS(add, add, +, i)
+ATOMIC_OPS(sub, add, +, -i)
+
+#define atomic_add_return_relaxed atomic_add_return_relaxed
+#define atomic_sub_return_relaxed atomic_sub_return_relaxed
+#define atomic_add_return atomic_add_return
+#define atomic_sub_return atomic_sub_return
+
+#define atomic_fetch_add_relaxed atomic_fetch_add_relaxed
+#define atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed
+#define atomic_fetch_add atomic_fetch_add
+#define atomic_fetch_sub atomic_fetch_sub
+
+#undef ATOMIC_OPS
+
+#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op, I) \
+ ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, asm_op, I, w, int, )
+
+ATOMIC_OPS(and, and, i)
+ATOMIC_OPS( or, or, i)
+ATOMIC_OPS(xor, xor, i)
+
+#define atomic_fetch_and_relaxed atomic_fetch_and_relaxed
+#define atomic_fetch_or_relaxed atomic_fetch_or_relaxed
+#define atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed
+#define atomic_fetch_and atomic_fetch_and
+#define atomic_fetch_or atomic_fetch_or
+#define atomic_fetch_xor atomic_fetch_xor
+
+#undef ATOMIC_OPS
+
+#undef ATOMIC_FETCH_OP
+#undef ATOMIC_OP_RETURN
+
+/* This is required to provide a full barrier on success. */
+static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
+{
+ int prev, rc;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "0: lr.w %[p], %[c]\n"
+ " beq %[p], %[u], 1f\n"
+ " add %[rc], %[p], %[a]\n"
+ " sc.w.rl %[rc], %[rc], %[c]\n"
+ " bnez %[rc], 0b\n"
+ " fence rw, rw\n"
+ "1:\n"
+ : [p]"=&r" (prev), [rc]"=&r" (rc), [c]"+A" (v->counter)
+ : [a]"r" (a), [u]"r" (u)
+ : "memory");
+ return prev;
+}
+#define atomic_fetch_add_unless atomic_fetch_add_unless
+
+/*
+ * atomic_{cmp,}xchg is required to have exactly the same ordering semantics as
+ * {cmp,}xchg and the operations that return, so they need a full barrier.
+ */
+#define ATOMIC_OP(c_t, prefix, size) \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_xchg_relaxed(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __xchg_generic(&(v->counter), n, size, "", "", ""); \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_xchg_acquire(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __xchg_generic(&(v->counter), n, size, \
+ "", "", RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER); \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_xchg_release(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __xchg_generic(&(v->counter), n, size, \
+ "", RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER, ""); \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_xchg(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __xchg_generic(&(v->counter), n, size, \
+ ".aqrl", "", ""); \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_cmpxchg_relaxed(atomic##prefix##_t *v, \
+ c_t o, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __cmpxchg_generic(&(v->counter), o, n, size, \
+ "", "", ""); \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_cmpxchg_acquire(atomic##prefix##_t *v, \
+ c_t o, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __cmpxchg_generic(&(v->counter), o, n, size, \
+ "", "", RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER); \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_cmpxchg_release(atomic##prefix##_t *v, \
+ c_t o, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __cmpxchg_generic(&(v->counter), o, n, size, \
+ "", RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER, ""); \
+} \
+static inline \
+c_t atomic##prefix##_cmpxchg(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t o, c_t n) \
+{ \
+ return __cmpxchg_generic(&(v->counter), o, n, size, \
+ ".rl", "", " fence rw, rw\n"); \
+}
+
+#define ATOMIC_OPS() \
+ ATOMIC_OP(int, , 4)
+
+ATOMIC_OPS()
+
+#define atomic_xchg_relaxed atomic_xchg_relaxed
+#define atomic_xchg_acquire atomic_xchg_acquire
+#define atomic_xchg_release atomic_xchg_release
+#define atomic_xchg atomic_xchg
+#define atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed
+#define atomic_cmpxchg_acquire atomic_cmpxchg_acquire
+#define atomic_cmpxchg_release atomic_cmpxchg_release
+#define atomic_cmpxchg atomic_cmpxchg
+
+#undef ATOMIC_OPS
+#undef ATOMIC_OP
+
+static inline int atomic_sub_if_positive(atomic_t *v, int offset)
+{
+ int prev, rc;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "0: lr.w %[p], %[c]\n"
+ " sub %[rc], %[p], %[o]\n"
+ " bltz %[rc], 1f\n"
+ " sc.w.rl %[rc], %[rc], %[c]\n"
+ " bnez %[rc], 0b\n"
+ " fence rw, rw\n"
+ "1:\n"
+ : [p]"=&r" (prev), [rc]"=&r" (rc), [c]"+A" (v->counter)
+ : [o]"r" (offset)
+ : "memory" );
+ return prev - offset;
+}
+
+#define atomic_dec_if_positive(v) atomic_sub_if_positive(v, 1)
+
+#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H */
+
+/*
+ * Local variables:
+ * mode: C
+ * c-file-style: "BSD"
+ * c-basic-offset: 4
+ * indent-tabs-mode: nil
+ * End:
+ */
diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ff3f23dbd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
+#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H
+#define _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H
+
+#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "\tfence r , rw\n"
+#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "\tfence rw, w\n"
+
+#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H */
--
2.43.0
Hi, On 05/02/2024 15:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com> > > Additionally, this patch introduces macros in fence.h, > which are utilized in atomic.h. > > atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) > were updated to use __*xchg_generic(). > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> The author is Bobby, but I don't see a Signed-off-by. Did you forgot it? > --- > Changes in V4: > - do changes related to the updates of [PATCH v3 13/34] xen/riscv: introduce cmpxchg.h > - drop casts in read_atomic_size(), write_atomic(), add_sized() > - tabs -> spaces > - drop #ifdef CONFIG_SMP ... #endif in fence.ha as it is simpler to handle NR_CPUS=1 > the same as NR_CPUS>1 with accepting less than ideal performance. > --- > Changes in V3: > - update the commit message > - add SPDX for fence.h > - code style fixes > - Remove /* TODO: ... */ for add_sized macros. It looks correct to me. > - re-order the patch > - merge to this patch fence.h > --- > Changes in V2: > - Change an author of commit. I got this header from Bobby's old repo. > --- > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h | 395 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h | 8 + > 2 files changed, 403 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h > > diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..267d3c0803 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Taken and modified from Linux. Which version of Linux? Can you also spell out what are the big changes? This would be helpful if we need to re-sync. > + * > + * atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) were updated to use > + * __*xchg_generic() > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > + * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Vates SAS > + */ > + > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > +#define _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > + > +#include <xen/atomic.h> > +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h> > +#include <asm/fence.h> > +#include <asm/io.h> > +#include <asm/system.h> > + > +void __bad_atomic_size(void); > + > +static always_inline void read_atomic_size(const volatile void *p, > + void *res, > + unsigned int size) > +{ > + switch ( size ) > + { > + case 1: *(uint8_t *)res = readb(p); break; > + case 2: *(uint16_t *)res = readw(p); break; > + case 4: *(uint32_t *)res = readl(p); break; > + case 8: *(uint32_t *)res = readq(p); break; > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; > + } > +} > + > +#define read_atomic(p) ({ \ > + union { typeof(*p) val; char c[0]; } x_; \ > + read_atomic_size(p, x_.c, sizeof(*p)); \ > + x_.val; \ > +}) > + > +#define write_atomic(p, x) \ > +({ \ > + typeof(*p) x__ = (x); \ > + switch ( sizeof(*p) ) \ > + { \ > + case 1: writeb((uint8_t)x__, p); break; \ > + case 2: writew((uint16_t)x__, p); break; \ > + case 4: writel((uint32_t)x__, p); break; \ > + case 8: writeq((uint64_t)x__, p); break; \ > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > + } \ > + x__; \ > +}) > + > +#define add_sized(p, x) \ > +({ \ > + typeof(*(p)) x__ = (x); \ > + switch ( sizeof(*(p)) ) \ > + { \ > + case 1: writeb(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > + case 2: writew(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > + case 4: writel(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > + } \ > +}) > + > +/* > + * __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) - Declare an unqualified scalar type, leaving > + * non-scalar types unchanged. > + * > + * Prefer C11 _Generic for better compile-times and simpler code. Note: 'char' Xen is technically built using c99/gnu99. So it is feels a bit odd to introduce a C11 feature. I see that _Generic is already used in PPC... However, if we decide to add more use of it, then I think this should at minimum be documented in docs/misra/C-language-toolchain.rst (the more if we plan the macro is moved to common as Jan suggested). Cheers, -- Julien Grall
Hi Julien, On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 19:22 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/02/2024 15:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com> > > > > Additionally, this patch introduces macros in fence.h, > > which are utilized in atomic.h. > > > > atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) > > were updated to use __*xchg_generic(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> > > The author is Bobby, but I don't see a Signed-off-by. Did you forgot > it? I missed to add that as I thought that it would be enough to change a commit author. > > > --- > > Changes in V4: > > - do changes related to the updates of [PATCH v3 13/34] > > xen/riscv: introduce cmpxchg.h > > - drop casts in read_atomic_size(), write_atomic(), add_sized() > > - tabs -> spaces > > - drop #ifdef CONFIG_SMP ... #endif in fence.ha as it is simpler > > to handle NR_CPUS=1 > > the same as NR_CPUS>1 with accepting less than ideal > > performance. > > --- > > Changes in V3: > > - update the commit message > > - add SPDX for fence.h > > - code style fixes > > - Remove /* TODO: ... */ for add_sized macros. It looks correct > > to me. > > - re-order the patch > > - merge to this patch fence.h > > --- > > Changes in V2: > > - Change an author of commit. I got this header from Bobby's old > > repo. > > --- > > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h | 395 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h | 8 + > > 2 files changed, 403 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > > b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..267d3c0803 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > +/* > > + * Taken and modified from Linux. > > Which version of Linux? Can you also spell out what are the big > changes? > This would be helpful if we need to re-sync. Sure, I'll add the changes here. > > > + * > > + * atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) were > > updated to use > > + * __*xchg_generic() > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > > + * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Vates SAS > > + */ > > + > > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > > +#define _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > > + > > +#include <xen/atomic.h> > > +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h> > > +#include <asm/fence.h> > > +#include <asm/io.h> > > +#include <asm/system.h> > > + > > +void __bad_atomic_size(void); > > + > > +static always_inline void read_atomic_size(const volatile void *p, > > + void *res, > > + unsigned int size) > > +{ > > + switch ( size ) > > + { > > + case 1: *(uint8_t *)res = readb(p); break; > > + case 2: *(uint16_t *)res = readw(p); break; > > + case 4: *(uint32_t *)res = readl(p); break; > > + case 8: *(uint32_t *)res = readq(p); break; > > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; > > + } > > +} > > + > > +#define read_atomic(p) ({ \ > > + union { typeof(*p) val; char c[0]; } x_; \ > > + read_atomic_size(p, x_.c, sizeof(*p)); \ > > + x_.val; \ > > +}) > > + > > +#define write_atomic(p, x) \ > > +({ \ > > + typeof(*p) x__ = (x); \ > > + switch ( sizeof(*p) ) \ > > + { \ > > + case 1: writeb((uint8_t)x__, p); break; \ > > + case 2: writew((uint16_t)x__, p); break; \ > > + case 4: writel((uint32_t)x__, p); break; \ > > + case 8: writeq((uint64_t)x__, p); break; \ > > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > > + } \ > > + x__; \ > > +}) > > + > > +#define add_sized(p, x) \ > > +({ \ > > + typeof(*(p)) x__ = (x); \ > > + switch ( sizeof(*(p)) ) \ > > + { \ > > + case 1: writeb(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > > + case 2: writew(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > > + case 4: writel(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > > + } \ > > +}) > > + > > +/* > > + * __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) - Declare an unqualified scalar > > type, leaving > > + * non-scalar types unchanged. > > + * > > + * Prefer C11 _Generic for better compile-times and simpler code. > > Note: 'char' > > Xen is technically built using c99/gnu99. So it is feels a bit odd to > introduce a C11 feature. I see that _Generic is already used in > PPC... > However, if we decide to add more use of it, then I think this should > at > minimum be documented in docs/misra/C-language-toolchain.rst (the > more > if we plan the macro is moved to common as Jan suggested). > > Cheers, >
On 05.02.2024 16:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com> > > Additionally, this patch introduces macros in fence.h, > which are utilized in atomic.h. These are used in an earlier patch already, so either you want to re-order the series, or you want to move that introduction ahead. > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Taken and modified from Linux. > + * > + * atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) were updated to use > + * __*xchg_generic() > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > + * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Vates SAS > + */ > + > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > +#define _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > + > +#include <xen/atomic.h> > +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h> > +#include <asm/fence.h> > +#include <asm/io.h> > +#include <asm/system.h> > + > +void __bad_atomic_size(void); > + > +static always_inline void read_atomic_size(const volatile void *p, > + void *res, > + unsigned int size) > +{ > + switch ( size ) > + { > + case 1: *(uint8_t *)res = readb(p); break; > + case 2: *(uint16_t *)res = readw(p); break; > + case 4: *(uint32_t *)res = readl(p); break; > + case 8: *(uint32_t *)res = readq(p); break; Why is it the MMIO primitives you use here, i.e. not read<X>_cpu()? It's RAM you're accessing after all. Also - no CONFIG_64BIT conditional here (like you have in the other patch)? > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; > + } > +} > + > +#define read_atomic(p) ({ \ > + union { typeof(*p) val; char c[0]; } x_; \ > + read_atomic_size(p, x_.c, sizeof(*p)); \ I'll be curious for how much longer gcc will tolerate this accessing of a zero-length array, without issuing at least a warning. I'd recommend using sizeof(*(p)) as the array dimension right away. (From this not also the missing parentheses in what you have.) > + x_.val; \ > +}) > + > +#define write_atomic(p, x) \ > +({ \ > + typeof(*p) x__ = (x); \ > + switch ( sizeof(*p) ) \ > + { \ > + case 1: writeb((uint8_t)x__, p); break; \ > + case 2: writew((uint16_t)x__, p); break; \ > + case 4: writel((uint32_t)x__, p); break; \ > + case 8: writeq((uint64_t)x__, p); break; \ Are the casts actually necessary here? > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > + } \ > + x__; \ > +}) > + > +#define add_sized(p, x) \ > +({ \ > + typeof(*(p)) x__ = (x); \ > + switch ( sizeof(*(p)) ) \ > + { \ > + case 1: writeb(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > + case 2: writew(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > + case 4: writel(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > + } \ > +}) > + > +/* > + * __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) - Declare an unqualified scalar type, leaving > + * non-scalar types unchanged. > + * > + * Prefer C11 _Generic for better compile-times and simpler code. Note: 'char' > + * is not type-compatible with 'signed char', and we define a separate case. > + */ > +#define __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(type) \ > + unsigned type: (unsigned type)0, \ > + signed type: (signed type)0 > + > +#define __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) typeof( \ > + _Generic((x), \ > + char: (char)0, \ > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(char), \ > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(short), \ > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(int), \ > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long), \ > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long long), \ > + default: (x))) This isn't RISC-V specific, is it? In which case it wants moving to, perhaps, xen/macros.h (and then also have the leading underscores dropped). > +#define READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x)) > +#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \ > + do { \ > + *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \ > + } while (0) In Xen we use ACCESS_ONCE(); any reason you need to introduce {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in addition? Without them, __unqual_scalar_typeof() may then also not be needed (or, if there's a need to enhance it, may then be needed for ACCESS_ONCE()). Which in turn raises the question why only READ_ONCE() uses it here. > +#define __atomic_acquire_fence() \ > + __asm__ __volatile__( RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory" ) Missing blank here and ... > +#define __atomic_release_fence() \ > + __asm__ __volatile__( RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory" ); ... here, and stray semicolon additionally just here. > +static inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) > +{ > + return READ_ONCE(v->counter); > +} > + > +static inline int _atomic_read(atomic_t v) > +{ > + return v.counter; > +} > + > +static inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i) > +{ > + WRITE_ONCE(v->counter, i); > +} > + > +static inline void _atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i) > +{ > + v->counter = i; > +} > + > +static inline int atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v) > +{ > + return atomic_sub_return(i, v) == 0; > +} > + > +static inline void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v) > +{ > + atomic_add(1, v); > +} > + > +static inline int atomic_inc_return(atomic_t *v) > +{ > + return atomic_add_return(1, v); > +} > + > +static inline void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v) > +{ > + atomic_sub(1, v); > +} > + > +static inline int atomic_dec_return(atomic_t *v) > +{ > + return atomic_sub_return(1, v); > +} > + > +static inline int atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v) > +{ > + return atomic_sub_return(1, v) == 0; > +} > + > +static inline int atomic_add_negative(int i, atomic_t *v) > +{ > + return atomic_add_return(i, v) < 0; > +} > + > +static inline int atomic_inc_and_test(atomic_t *v) > +{ > + return atomic_add_return(1, v) == 0; > +} None of these look RISC-V-specific. Perhaps worth having something in asm-generic/ that can be utilized here? > +/* > + * First, the atomic ops that have no ordering constraints and therefor don't > + * have the AQ or RL bits set. These don't return anything, so there's only > + * one version to worry about. > + */ > +#define ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op, I, asm_type, c_type, prefix) \ > +static inline \ > +void atomic##prefix##_##op(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t *v) \ > +{ \ > + __asm__ __volatile__ ( \ > + " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type " zero, %1, %0" \ > + : "+A" (v->counter) \ > + : "r" (I) \ > + : "memory" ); \ > +} \ > + > +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op, I) \ > + ATOMIC_OP (op, asm_op, I, w, int, ) So the last three parameters are to be ready to also support atomic64, without actually doing so right now? > +ATOMIC_OPS(add, add, i) > +ATOMIC_OPS(sub, add, -i) > +ATOMIC_OPS(and, and, i) > +ATOMIC_OPS( or, or, i) > +ATOMIC_OPS(xor, xor, i) > + > +#undef ATOMIC_OP > +#undef ATOMIC_OPS > + > +/* > + * Atomic ops that have ordered, relaxed, acquire, and release variants. > + * There's two flavors of these: the arithmatic ops have both fetch and return > + * versions, while the logical ops only have fetch versions. > + */ I'm somewhat confused by the comment: It first talks of 4 variants, but then says there are only 2 (arithmetic) or 1 (logical) ones. > +#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, asm_op, I, asm_type, c_type, prefix) \ > +static inline \ > +c_type atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op##_relaxed(c_type i, \ > + atomic##prefix##_t *v) \ > +{ \ > + register c_type ret; \ > + __asm__ __volatile__ ( \ > + " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type " %1, %2, %0" \ > + : "+A" (v->counter), "=r" (ret) \ > + : "r" (I) \ > + : "memory" ); \ > + return ret; \ > +} \ > +static inline \ > +c_type atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t *v) \ > +{ \ > + register c_type ret; \ > + __asm__ __volatile__ ( \ > + " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type ".aqrl %1, %2, %0" \ > + : "+A" (v->counter), "=r" (ret) \ > + : "r" (I) \ > + : "memory" ); \ > + return ret; \ > +} > + > +#define ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, asm_op, c_op, I, asm_type, c_type, prefix) \ > +static inline \ > +c_type atomic##prefix##_##op##_return_relaxed(c_type i, \ > + atomic##prefix##_t *v) \ > +{ \ > + return atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op##_relaxed(i, v) c_op I; \ > +} \ > +static inline \ > +c_type atomic##prefix##_##op##_return(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t *v) \ > +{ \ > + return atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op(i, v) c_op I; \ > +} > + > +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op, c_op, I) \ > + ATOMIC_FETCH_OP( op, asm_op, I, w, int, ) \ > + ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, asm_op, c_op, I, w, int, ) > + > +ATOMIC_OPS(add, add, +, i) > +ATOMIC_OPS(sub, add, +, -i) > + > +#define atomic_add_return_relaxed atomic_add_return_relaxed > +#define atomic_sub_return_relaxed atomic_sub_return_relaxed > +#define atomic_add_return atomic_add_return > +#define atomic_sub_return atomic_sub_return > + > +#define atomic_fetch_add_relaxed atomic_fetch_add_relaxed > +#define atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed > +#define atomic_fetch_add atomic_fetch_add > +#define atomic_fetch_sub atomic_fetch_sub What are all of these #define-s (any yet more further down) about? > +static inline int atomic_sub_if_positive(atomic_t *v, int offset) > +{ > + int prev, rc; > + > + __asm__ __volatile__ ( > + "0: lr.w %[p], %[c]\n" > + " sub %[rc], %[p], %[o]\n" > + " bltz %[rc], 1f\n" > + " sc.w.rl %[rc], %[rc], %[c]\n" > + " bnez %[rc], 0b\n" > + " fence rw, rw\n" > + "1:\n" > + : [p]"=&r" (prev), [rc]"=&r" (rc), [c]"+A" (v->counter) > + : [o]"r" (offset) Nit: Blanks please between ] and ". > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H > +#define _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H > + > +#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "\tfence r , rw\n" > +#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "\tfence rw, w\n" Seeing that another "fence rw, rw" appears in this patch, I'm now pretty sure you want to add e.g. RISCV_FULL_BARRIER here as well. Jan
On Tue, 2024-02-13 at 12:36 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 05.02.2024 16:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com> > > > > Additionally, this patch introduces macros in fence.h, > > which are utilized in atomic.h. > > These are used in an earlier patch already, so either you want to > re-order the series, or you want to move that introduction ahead. > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > +/* > > + * Taken and modified from Linux. > > + * > > + * atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) were > > updated to use > > + * __*xchg_generic() > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > > + * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Vates SAS > > + */ > > + > > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > > +#define _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > > + > > +#include <xen/atomic.h> > > +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h> > > +#include <asm/fence.h> > > +#include <asm/io.h> > > +#include <asm/system.h> > > + > > +void __bad_atomic_size(void); > > + > > +static always_inline void read_atomic_size(const volatile void *p, > > + void *res, > > + unsigned int size) > > +{ > > + switch ( size ) > > + { > > + case 1: *(uint8_t *)res = readb(p); break; > > + case 2: *(uint16_t *)res = readw(p); break; > > + case 4: *(uint32_t *)res = readl(p); break; > > + case 8: *(uint32_t *)res = readq(p); break; > > Why is it the MMIO primitives you use here, i.e. not read<X>_cpu()? > It's RAM you're accessing after all. Legacy from Linux kernel. For some reason they wanted to have ordered read/write access. > > Also - no CONFIG_64BIT conditional here (like you have in the other > patch)? Agree, it should be added. > > > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; > > + } > > +} > > + > > +#define read_atomic(p) ({ \ > > + union { typeof(*p) val; char c[0]; } x_; \ > > + read_atomic_size(p, x_.c, sizeof(*p)); \ > > I'll be curious for how much longer gcc will tolerate this accessing > of a zero-length array, without issuing at least a warning. I'd > recommend using sizeof(*(p)) as the array dimension right away. (From > this not also the missing parentheses in what you have.) Thanks. I'll update that. > > > + x_.val; \ > > +}) > > + > > +#define write_atomic(p, x) \ > > +({ \ > > + typeof(*p) x__ = (x); \ > > + switch ( sizeof(*p) ) \ > > + { \ > > + case 1: writeb((uint8_t)x__, p); break; \ > > + case 2: writew((uint16_t)x__, p); break; \ > > + case 4: writel((uint32_t)x__, p); break; \ > > + case 8: writeq((uint64_t)x__, p); break; \ > > Are the casts actually necessary here? Not really, we can drop them. > > > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > > + } \ > > + x__; \ > > +}) > > + > > +#define add_sized(p, x) \ > > +({ \ > > + typeof(*(p)) x__ = (x); \ > > + switch ( sizeof(*(p)) ) \ > > + { \ > > + case 1: writeb(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > > + case 2: writew(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > > + case 4: writel(read_atomic(p) + x__, p); break; \ > > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \ > > + } \ > > +}) > > + > > +/* > > + * __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) - Declare an unqualified scalar > > type, leaving > > + * non-scalar types unchanged. > > + * > > + * Prefer C11 _Generic for better compile-times and simpler code. > > Note: 'char' > > + * is not type-compatible with 'signed char', and we define a > > separate case. > > + */ > > +#define __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(type) \ > > + unsigned type: (unsigned type)0, \ > > + signed type: (signed type)0 > > + > > +#define __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) typeof( \ > > + _Generic((x), \ > > + char: (char)0, \ > > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(char), \ > > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(short), \ > > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(int), \ > > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long), \ > > + __scalar_type_to_expr_cases(long long), \ > > + default: (x))) > > This isn't RISC-V specific, is it? In which case it wants moving to, > perhaps, xen/macros.h (and then also have the leading underscores > dropped). No, at all. But this thing is only used in RISC-V part, but if it would be better to move it to xen/macros.h I will happy to sent separate patch. > > > +#define READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) > > *)&(x)) > > +#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \ > > + do { \ > > + *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \ > > + } while (0) > > In Xen we use ACCESS_ONCE(); any reason you need to introduce > {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in addition? Without them, > __unqual_scalar_typeof() > may then also not be needed (or, if there's a need to enhance it, may > then be needed for ACCESS_ONCE()). Which in turn raises the question > why only READ_ONCE() uses it here. Hmm, READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() can be dropped then, I'll switch everything in my code to ACCESS_ONCE(). > > > +#define __atomic_acquire_fence() \ > > + __asm__ __volatile__( RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory" ) > > Missing blank here and ... > > > +#define __atomic_release_fence() \ > > + __asm__ __volatile__( RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory" ); > > ... here, and stray semicolon additionally just here. Thanks. I'll apply your comments to this part of code. > > > +static inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + return READ_ONCE(v->counter); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int _atomic_read(atomic_t v) > > +{ > > + return v.counter; > > +} > > + > > +static inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i) > > +{ > > + WRITE_ONCE(v->counter, i); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void _atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i) > > +{ > > + v->counter = i; > > +} > > + > > +static inline int atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + return atomic_sub_return(i, v) == 0; > > +} > > + > > +static inline void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + atomic_add(1, v); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int atomic_inc_return(atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + return atomic_add_return(1, v); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + atomic_sub(1, v); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int atomic_dec_return(atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + return atomic_sub_return(1, v); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + return atomic_sub_return(1, v) == 0; > > +} > > + > > +static inline int atomic_add_negative(int i, atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + return atomic_add_return(i, v) < 0; > > +} > > + > > +static inline int atomic_inc_and_test(atomic_t *v) > > +{ > > + return atomic_add_return(1, v) == 0; > > +} > > None of these look RISC-V-specific. Perhaps worth having something in > asm-generic/ that can be utilized here? Looks like we can, at least, PPC has the similar definitions. > > > +/* > > + * First, the atomic ops that have no ordering constraints and > > therefor don't > > + * have the AQ or RL bits set. These don't return anything, so > > there's only > > + * one version to worry about. > > + */ > > +#define ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op, I, asm_type, c_type, prefix) \ > > +static inline \ > > +void atomic##prefix##_##op(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t *v) \ > > +{ \ > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ( \ > > + " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type " zero, %1, %0" \ > > + : "+A" (v->counter) \ > > + : "r" (I) \ > > + : "memory" ); \ > > +} \ > > + > > +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op, I) \ > > + ATOMIC_OP (op, asm_op, I, w, int, ) > > So the last three parameters are to be ready to also support > atomic64, without actually doing so right now? Yes, it is ready to support. > > > +ATOMIC_OPS(add, add, i) > > +ATOMIC_OPS(sub, add, -i) > > +ATOMIC_OPS(and, and, i) > > +ATOMIC_OPS( or, or, i) > > +ATOMIC_OPS(xor, xor, i) > > + > > +#undef ATOMIC_OP > > +#undef ATOMIC_OPS > > + > > +/* > > + * Atomic ops that have ordered, relaxed, acquire, and release > > variants. > > + * There's two flavors of these: the arithmatic ops have both > > fetch and return > > + * versions, while the logical ops only have fetch versions. > > + */ > > I'm somewhat confused by the comment: It first talks of 4 variants, > but > then says there are only 2 (arithmetic) or 1 (logical) ones. Probably they mean that usually they have 4 variants, but it was implemented only 2 (arith) and 1 (logical). > > > +#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, asm_op, I, asm_type, c_type, > > prefix) \ > > +static > > inline \ > > +c_type atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op##_relaxed(c_type > > i, \ > > + atomic##prefix##_t > > *v) \ > > +{ > > \ > > + register c_type > > ret; \ > > + __asm__ __volatile__ > > ( \ > > + " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type " %1, %2, > > %0" \ > > + : "+A" (v->counter), "=r" > > (ret) \ > > + : "r" > > (I) \ > > + : "memory" > > ); \ > > + return > > ret; \ > > +} > > \ > > +static > > inline \ > > +c_type atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t > > *v) \ > > +{ > > \ > > + register c_type > > ret; \ > > + __asm__ __volatile__ > > ( \ > > + " amo" #asm_op "." #asm_type ".aqrl %1, %2, > > %0" \ > > + : "+A" (v->counter), "=r" > > (ret) \ > > + : "r" > > (I) \ > > + : "memory" > > ); \ > > + return > > ret; \ > > +} > > + > > +#define ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, asm_op, c_op, I, asm_type, c_type, > > prefix) \ > > +static > > inline \ > > +c_type atomic##prefix##_##op##_return_relaxed(c_type > > i, \ > > + atomic##prefix##_t > > *v) \ > > +{ > > \ > > + return atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op##_relaxed(i, v) c_op > > I; \ > > +} > > \ > > +static > > inline \ > > +c_type atomic##prefix##_##op##_return(c_type i, atomic##prefix##_t > > *v) \ > > +{ > > \ > > + return atomic##prefix##_fetch_##op(i, v) c_op > > I; \ > > +} > > + > > +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, asm_op, c_op, > > I) \ > > + ATOMIC_FETCH_OP( op, asm_op, I, w, int, > > ) \ > > + ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, asm_op, c_op, I, w, int, ) > > + > > +ATOMIC_OPS(add, add, +, i) > > +ATOMIC_OPS(sub, add, +, -i) > > + > > +#define atomic_add_return_relaxed atomic_add_return_relaxed > > +#define atomic_sub_return_relaxed atomic_sub_return_relaxed > > +#define atomic_add_return atomic_add_return > > +#define atomic_sub_return atomic_sub_return > > + > > +#define atomic_fetch_add_relaxed atomic_fetch_add_relaxed > > +#define atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed > > +#define atomic_fetch_add atomic_fetch_add > > +#define atomic_fetch_sub atomic_fetch_sub > > What are all of these #define-s (any yet more further down) about? > > > +static inline int atomic_sub_if_positive(atomic_t *v, int offset) > > +{ > > + int prev, rc; > > + > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ( > > + "0: lr.w %[p], %[c]\n" > > + " sub %[rc], %[p], %[o]\n" > > + " bltz %[rc], 1f\n" > > + " sc.w.rl %[rc], %[rc], %[c]\n" > > + " bnez %[rc], 0b\n" > > + " fence rw, rw\n" > > + "1:\n" > > + : [p]"=&r" (prev), [rc]"=&r" (rc), [c]"+A" (v->counter) > > + : [o]"r" (offset) > > Nit: Blanks please between ] and ". Thanks. I'll update that. > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H > > +#define _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H > > + > > +#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "\tfence r , rw\n" > > +#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "\tfence rw, w\n" > > Seeing that another "fence rw, rw" appears in this patch, I'm now > pretty > sure you want to add e.g. RISCV_FULL_BARRIER here as well. It makes sense. I'll do that. Thanks. > > Jan
On 14.02.2024 13:11, Oleksii wrote: > On Tue, 2024-02-13 at 12:36 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 05.02.2024 16:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h >>> @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ >>> +/* >>> + * Taken and modified from Linux. >>> + * >>> + * atomic##prefix##_*xchg_*(atomic##prefix##_t *v, c_t n) were >>> updated to use >>> + * __*xchg_generic() >>> + * >>> + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. >>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California >>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive >>> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Vates SAS >>> + */ >>> + >>> +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H >>> +#define _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H >>> + >>> +#include <xen/atomic.h> >>> +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h> >>> +#include <asm/fence.h> >>> +#include <asm/io.h> >>> +#include <asm/system.h> >>> + >>> +void __bad_atomic_size(void); >>> + >>> +static always_inline void read_atomic_size(const volatile void *p, >>> + void *res, >>> + unsigned int size) >>> +{ >>> + switch ( size ) >>> + { >>> + case 1: *(uint8_t *)res = readb(p); break; >>> + case 2: *(uint16_t *)res = readw(p); break; >>> + case 4: *(uint32_t *)res = readl(p); break; >>> + case 8: *(uint32_t *)res = readq(p); break; >> >> Why is it the MMIO primitives you use here, i.e. not read<X>_cpu()? >> It's RAM you're accessing after all. > Legacy from Linux kernel. For some reason they wanted to have ordered > read/write access. Wants expressing in a comment then, or at the very least in the patch description. Jan
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.