When building for Power with CONFIG_DEBUG unset, a compiler error gets
raised inside page_alloc.c's node_to_scrub function:
common/page_alloc.c: In function 'node_to_scrub.part.0':
common/page_alloc.c:1217:29: error: array subscript 1 is above array
bounds of 'long unsigned int[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
1217 | if ( node_need_scrub[node] )
It appears that this is a false positive, given that in practice
cycle_node should never return a node ID >= MAX_NUMNODES as long as the
architecture's node_online_map is properly defined and initialized, so
this additional bounds check is only to satisfy GCC.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@raptorengineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
---
v2: Add comment to explain the bounds check.
xen/common/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
index 35d9a26fa6..9b5df74fdd 100644
--- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
+++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
@@ -1211,6 +1211,14 @@ static unsigned int node_to_scrub(bool get_node)
} while ( !cpumask_empty(&node_to_cpumask(node)) &&
(node != local_node) );
+ /*
+ * In practice `node` will always be within MAX_NUMNODES, but GCC can't
+ * always see that, so an explicit check is necessary to avoid tripping
+ * its out-of-bounds array access warning (-Warray-bounds).
+ */
+ if ( node >= MAX_NUMNODES )
+ break;
+
if ( node == local_node )
break;
--
2.30.2
On 27.09.2023 00:37, Shawn Anastasio wrote: > --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c > +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > @@ -1211,6 +1211,14 @@ static unsigned int node_to_scrub(bool get_node) > } while ( !cpumask_empty(&node_to_cpumask(node)) && > (node != local_node) ); > > + /* > + * In practice `node` will always be within MAX_NUMNODES, but GCC can't > + * always see that, so an explicit check is necessary to avoid tripping > + * its out-of-bounds array access warning (-Warray-bounds). > + */ > + if ( node >= MAX_NUMNODES ) > + break; > + > if ( node == local_node ) > break; My comment on v1 wasn't addressed, either verbally or by a code change. Imo that would move us a tiny step closer to what Andrew was asking for as well. Jan
On 27.09.2023 08:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 27.09.2023 00:37, Shawn Anastasio wrote: >> --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c >> +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c >> @@ -1211,6 +1211,14 @@ static unsigned int node_to_scrub(bool get_node) >> } while ( !cpumask_empty(&node_to_cpumask(node)) && >> (node != local_node) ); >> >> + /* >> + * In practice `node` will always be within MAX_NUMNODES, but GCC can't >> + * always see that, so an explicit check is necessary to avoid tripping >> + * its out-of-bounds array access warning (-Warray-bounds). >> + */ >> + if ( node >= MAX_NUMNODES ) >> + break; >> + >> if ( node == local_node ) >> break; > > My comment on v1 wasn't addressed, either verbally or by a code change. I have to apologize, you did respond, and I didn't spot the response earlier on. I'm not happy about the added code, but at least it has a comment now. Hence I guess I simply withdraw my objection, so the change can go in. Jan > Imo > that would move us a tiny step closer to what Andrew was asking for as well. > > Jan >
Hi, > On Sep 27, 2023, at 06:37, Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@raptorengineering.com> wrote: > > When building for Power with CONFIG_DEBUG unset, a compiler error gets > raised inside page_alloc.c's node_to_scrub function: > > common/page_alloc.c: In function 'node_to_scrub.part.0': > common/page_alloc.c:1217:29: error: array subscript 1 is above array > bounds of 'long unsigned int[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds] > 1217 | if ( node_need_scrub[node] ) > > It appears that this is a false positive, given that in practice > cycle_node should never return a node ID >= MAX_NUMNODES as long as the > architecture's node_online_map is properly defined and initialized, so > this additional bounds check is only to satisfy GCC. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@raptorengineering.com> > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> I am seeing some discussions going on about this patch, but once this is patch is ready for merge please feel free to add: Release-acked-by: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@arm.com> Kind regards, Henry > --- > v2: Add comment to explain the bounds check. > > xen/common/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > index 35d9a26fa6..9b5df74fdd 100644 > --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c > +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > @@ -1211,6 +1211,14 @@ static unsigned int node_to_scrub(bool get_node) > } while ( !cpumask_empty(&node_to_cpumask(node)) && > (node != local_node) ); > > + /* > + * In practice `node` will always be within MAX_NUMNODES, but GCC can't > + * always see that, so an explicit check is necessary to avoid tripping > + * its out-of-bounds array access warning (-Warray-bounds). > + */ > + if ( node >= MAX_NUMNODES ) > + break; > + > if ( node == local_node ) > break; > > -- > 2.30.2 > >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.