<xen/lib.h> will be used in the patch "xen/riscv: introduce
decode_cause() stuff" and requires <asm/bug.h>
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
---
Changes in V5:
* the patch was introduced in the current patch series (V5)
---
xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h
diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e8b1e40823
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California
+ * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Vates
+ *
+ */
+#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H
+#define _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H
+
+#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H */
--
2.39.2
Hi Oleksii, On 16/03/2023 14:39, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > <xen/lib.h> will be used in the patch "xen/riscv: introduce > decode_cause() stuff" and requires <asm/bug.h> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> > --- > Changes in V5: > * the patch was introduced in the current patch series (V5) > --- > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..e8b1e40823 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Vates I am a bit puzzled with those copyright given the header is empty. But is there any reason this can't be folded in #6 or part of #6 moved forward? > + * NIT: Drop the line. > + */ > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H > +#define _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H > + > +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H */ -- Julien Grall
On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 17:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Oleksii, > > On 16/03/2023 14:39, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > <xen/lib.h> will be used in the patch "xen/riscv: introduce > > decode_cause() stuff" and requires <asm/bug.h> > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> > > --- > > Changes in V5: > > * the patch was introduced in the current patch series (V5) > > --- > > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..e8b1e40823 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > > + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Vates > > I am a bit puzzled with those copyright given the header is empty. > > But is there any reason this can't be folded in #6 or part of #6 > moved > forward? Initially it was folded in #6 but in this case a build will be failed after introduction of #5 as <asm/bug.h> is needed for <xen/lib.h> Taking into account that <asm/bug.h> is fully re-written after introduction of generic bug implementation we can remove copyrights from header fully. > > > + * > > NIT: Drop the line. Thanks. I'll do it in the next patch version. > > > + */ > > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H > > +#define _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H > > + > > +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_BUG_H */ >
On 22.03.2023 11:09, Oleksii wrote: > On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 17:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 16/03/2023 14:39, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> <xen/lib.h> will be used in the patch "xen/riscv: introduce >>> decode_cause() stuff" and requires <asm/bug.h> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> Changes in V5: >>> * the patch was introduced in the current patch series (V5) >>> --- >>> xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h >>> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h >>> b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000000..e8b1e40823 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h >>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ >>> +/* >>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California >>> + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Vates >> >> I am a bit puzzled with those copyright given the header is empty. >> >> But is there any reason this can't be folded in #6 or part of #6 >> moved >> forward? > Initially it was folded in #6 but in this case a build will be failed > after introduction of #5 as <asm/bug.h> is needed for <xen/lib.h> But what about the other option Julien mentioned, moving ahead the later "filling" of asm/bug.h, so it wouldn't be introduced empty and then (almost immediately) touched again to actually populate it? Jan
On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 11:27 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 22.03.2023 11:09, Oleksii wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 17:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 16/03/2023 14:39, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > > > <xen/lib.h> will be used in the patch "xen/riscv: introduce > > > > decode_cause() stuff" and requires <asm/bug.h> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > Changes in V5: > > > > * the patch was introduced in the current patch series (V5) > > > > --- > > > > xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h | 10 ++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > > > > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > > > b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 0000000000..e8b1e40823 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > > > +/* > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Vates > > > > > > I am a bit puzzled with those copyright given the header is > > > empty. > > > > > > But is there any reason this can't be folded in #6 or part of #6 > > > moved > > > forward? > > Initially it was folded in #6 but in this case a build will be > > failed > > after introduction of #5 as <asm/bug.h> is needed for <xen/lib.h> > > But what about the other option Julien mentioned, moving ahead the > later "filling" of asm/bug.h, so it wouldn't be introduced empty and > then (almost immediately) touched again to actually populate it? I think I can move the content of <asm/bug.h> from #6 to the current patch. ~ Oleksii
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.