For an unknown reason I added back the operator while backporting,
despite 4.16 having c06e3d810314 ("VT-d: per-domain IOMMU bitmap needs
to have dynamic size"). I can only assume that I mistakenly took the
4.15 backport as basis and/or reference.
Fixes: fa45f6b5560e ("VT-d: split domid map cleanup check into a function")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static void check_cleanup_domid_map(stru
if ( !found )
{
- clear_bit(iommu->index, &dom_iommu(d)->arch.vtd.iommu_bitmap);
+ clear_bit(iommu->index, dom_iommu(d)->arch.vtd.iommu_bitmap);
cleanup_domid_map(d, iommu);
}
}
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 11:27 PM
>
> For an unknown reason I added back the operator while backporting,
> despite 4.16 having c06e3d810314 ("VT-d: per-domain IOMMU bitmap needs
> to have dynamic size"). I can only assume that I mistakenly took the
> 4.15 backport as basis and/or reference.
>
> Fixes: fa45f6b5560e ("VT-d: split domid map cleanup check into a function")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static void check_cleanup_domid_map(stru
>
> if ( !found )
> {
> - clear_bit(iommu->index, &dom_iommu(d)->arch.vtd.iommu_bitmap);
> + clear_bit(iommu->index, dom_iommu(d)->arch.vtd.iommu_bitmap);
> cleanup_domid_map(d, iommu);
> }
> }
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.