xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h | 20 ++++++++++---------- xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Give a name to unnamed parameters to address violations of
MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.2 ("Function types shall be in prototype form with
named parameters").
Keep consistency between parameter names used in function
declarations and the ones used in the corresponding function
definitions, thus addressing violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.3
("All declarations of an object or function shall use the same names
and type qualifiers").
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@bugseng.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
index db29e3e205..1e2d8c1a65 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ void put_page_type(struct page_info *page);
int get_page_type(struct page_info *page, unsigned long type);
int put_page_type_preemptible(struct page_info *page);
int get_page_type_preemptible(struct page_info *page, unsigned long type);
-int put_old_guest_table(struct vcpu *);
+int put_old_guest_table(struct vcpu *v);
int get_page_from_l1e(
l1_pgentry_t l1e, struct domain *l1e_owner, struct domain *pg_owner);
void put_page_from_l1e(l1_pgentry_t l1e, struct domain *l1e_owner);
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ void audit_domains(void);
void make_cr3(struct vcpu *v, mfn_t mfn);
void update_cr3(struct vcpu *v);
-int vcpu_destroy_pagetables(struct vcpu *);
+int vcpu_destroy_pagetables(struct vcpu *v);
void *do_page_walk(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr);
/* Allocator functions for Xen pagetables. */
@@ -574,20 +574,20 @@ int __sync_local_execstate(void);
/* Arch-specific portion of memory_op hypercall. */
long arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg);
long subarch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg);
-int compat_arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void));
-int compat_subarch_memory_op(int op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void));
+int compat_arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg);
+int compat_subarch_memory_op(int op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg);
#define NIL(type) ((type *)-sizeof(type))
#define IS_NIL(ptr) (!((uintptr_t)(ptr) + sizeof(*(ptr))))
-int create_perdomain_mapping(struct domain *, unsigned long va,
- unsigned int nr, l1_pgentry_t **,
- struct page_info **);
-void destroy_perdomain_mapping(struct domain *, unsigned long va,
+int create_perdomain_mapping(struct domain *d, unsigned long va,
+ unsigned int nr, l1_pgentry_t **pl1tab,
+ struct page_info **ppg);
+void destroy_perdomain_mapping(struct domain *d, unsigned long va,
unsigned int nr);
-void free_perdomain_mappings(struct domain *);
+void free_perdomain_mappings(struct domain *d);
-void __iomem *ioremap_wc(paddr_t, size_t);
+void __iomem *ioremap_wc(paddr_t pa, size_t len);
extern int memory_add(unsigned long spfn, unsigned long epfn, unsigned int pxm);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
index be2b10a391..e1d9b94007 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -5591,7 +5591,7 @@ int __init populate_pt_range(unsigned long virt, unsigned long nr_mfns)
*
* It is an error to call with present flags over an unpopulated range.
*/
-int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
+int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int flags)
{
bool locking = system_state > SYS_STATE_boot;
l3_pgentry_t *pl3e = NULL;
@@ -5604,7 +5604,7 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
/* Set of valid PTE bits which may be altered. */
#define FLAGS_MASK (_PAGE_NX|_PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_RW|_PAGE_PRESENT)
- nf &= FLAGS_MASK;
+ flags &= FLAGS_MASK;
ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(s, PAGE_SIZE));
ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(e, PAGE_SIZE));
@@ -5628,7 +5628,7 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
if ( !(l3e_get_flags(*pl3e) & _PAGE_PRESENT) )
{
/* Confirm the caller isn't trying to create new mappings. */
- ASSERT(!(nf & _PAGE_PRESENT));
+ ASSERT(!(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT));
v += 1UL << L3_PAGETABLE_SHIFT;
v &= ~((1UL << L3_PAGETABLE_SHIFT) - 1);
@@ -5645,9 +5645,10 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
((e - v) >= (1UL << L3_PAGETABLE_SHIFT)) )
{
/* PAGE1GB: whole superpage is modified. */
- l3_pgentry_t nl3e = !(nf & _PAGE_PRESENT) ? l3e_empty()
+ l3_pgentry_t nl3e = !(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) ? l3e_empty()
: l3e_from_pfn(l3e_get_pfn(*pl3e),
- (l3e_get_flags(*pl3e) & ~FLAGS_MASK) | nf);
+ (l3e_get_flags(*pl3e) & ~FLAGS_MASK) |
+ flags);
l3e_write_atomic(pl3e, nl3e);
v += 1UL << L3_PAGETABLE_SHIFT;
@@ -5691,7 +5692,7 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
if ( !(l2e_get_flags(*pl2e) & _PAGE_PRESENT) )
{
/* Confirm the caller isn't trying to create new mappings. */
- ASSERT(!(nf & _PAGE_PRESENT));
+ ASSERT(!(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT));
v += 1UL << L2_PAGETABLE_SHIFT;
v &= ~((1UL << L2_PAGETABLE_SHIFT) - 1);
@@ -5704,9 +5705,10 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
((e-v) >= (1UL << L2_PAGETABLE_SHIFT)) )
{
/* PSE: whole superpage is modified. */
- l2_pgentry_t nl2e = !(nf & _PAGE_PRESENT) ? l2e_empty()
+ l2_pgentry_t nl2e = !(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) ? l2e_empty()
: l2e_from_pfn(l2e_get_pfn(*pl2e),
- (l2e_get_flags(*pl2e) & ~FLAGS_MASK) | nf);
+ (l2e_get_flags(*pl2e) & ~FLAGS_MASK) |
+ flags);
l2e_write_atomic(pl2e, nl2e);
v += 1UL << L2_PAGETABLE_SHIFT;
@@ -5756,11 +5758,11 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
/* Confirm the caller isn't trying to create new mappings. */
if ( !(l1e_get_flags(*pl1e) & _PAGE_PRESENT) )
- ASSERT(!(nf & _PAGE_PRESENT));
+ ASSERT(!(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT));
- nl1e = !(nf & _PAGE_PRESENT) ? l1e_empty()
+ nl1e = !(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) ? l1e_empty()
: l1e_from_pfn(l1e_get_pfn(*pl1e),
- (l1e_get_flags(*pl1e) & ~FLAGS_MASK) | nf);
+ (l1e_get_flags(*pl1e) & ~FLAGS_MASK) | flags);
l1e_write_atomic(pl1e, nl1e);
UNMAP_DOMAIN_PAGE(pl1e);
@@ -5770,7 +5772,8 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
* If we are not destroying mappings, or not done with the L2E,
* skip the empty&free check.
*/
- if ( (nf & _PAGE_PRESENT) || ((v != e) && (l1_table_offset(v) != 0)) )
+ if ( (flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) ||
+ ((v != e) && (l1_table_offset(v) != 0)) )
continue;
if ( locking )
spin_lock(&map_pgdir_lock);
@@ -5817,7 +5820,7 @@ int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf)
* If we are not destroying mappings, or not done with the L3E,
* skip the empty&free check.
*/
- if ( (nf & _PAGE_PRESENT) ||
+ if ( (flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) ||
((v != e) && (l2_table_offset(v) + l1_table_offset(v) != 0)) )
continue;
if ( locking )
@@ -5892,14 +5895,14 @@ int destroy_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e)
* a problem.
*/
void init_or_livepatch modify_xen_mappings_lite(
- unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int _nf)
+ unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int flags)
{
unsigned long v = s, fm, nf;
/* Set of valid PTE bits which may be altered. */
#define FLAGS_MASK (_PAGE_NX|_PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_RW|_PAGE_PRESENT)
fm = put_pte_flags(FLAGS_MASK);
- nf = put_pte_flags(_nf & FLAGS_MASK);
+ nf = put_pte_flags(flags & FLAGS_MASK);
#undef FLAGS_MASK
ASSERT(nf & _PAGE_PRESENT);
--
2.34.1On 04/08/2023 10:38 am, Federico Serafini wrote: > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > index be2b10a391..e1d9b94007 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > @@ -5591,7 +5591,7 @@ int __init populate_pt_range(unsigned long virt, unsigned long nr_mfns) > * > * It is an error to call with present flags over an unpopulated range. > */ > -int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf) > +int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int flags) I think both of these examples want to stay as nf (new flags). Flags on its own is ambiguous in context, and nf is a common shorthand in our pagetable code. And it will make the patch rather shorter. ~Andrew
On 04/08/23 11:47, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 04/08/2023 10:38 am, Federico Serafini wrote: >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> index be2b10a391..e1d9b94007 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> @@ -5591,7 +5591,7 @@ int __init populate_pt_range(unsigned long virt, unsigned long nr_mfns) >> * >> * It is an error to call with present flags over an unpopulated range. >> */ >> -int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int nf) >> +int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned int flags) > > I think both of these examples want to stay as nf (new flags). Flags on > its own is ambiguous in context, and nf is a common shorthand in our > pagetable code. > > And it will make the patch rather shorter. > > ~Andrew The arm code has its own implementation of modify_xen_mappings() which uses `flags`. I put Stefano and Julien in CC, so that if everyone likes `nf` I can propagate the change. -- Federico Serafini, M.Sc. Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)
Hi Federico, On 04/08/2023 11:29, Federico Serafini wrote: > On 04/08/23 11:47, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 04/08/2023 10:38 am, Federico Serafini wrote: >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >>> index be2b10a391..e1d9b94007 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >>> @@ -5591,7 +5591,7 @@ int __init populate_pt_range(unsigned long >>> virt, unsigned long nr_mfns) >>> * >>> * It is an error to call with present flags over an unpopulated >>> range. >>> */ >>> -int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned >>> int nf) >>> +int modify_xen_mappings(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, unsigned >>> int flags) >> >> I think both of these examples want to stay as nf (new flags). Flags on >> its own is ambiguous in context, and nf is a common shorthand in our >> pagetable code. I guess you mean x86 code? I agree that 'flags' is ambiguous but... >> >> And it will make the patch rather shorter. >> >> ~Andrew > > The arm code has its own implementation of modify_xen_mappings() > which uses `flags`. > I put Stefano and Julien in CC, so that if everyone likes `nf` I can > propagate the change. ... I would not say I like the name 'nf'. I would prefer 'new_flags'. Anyway, unlike arm, the x86 version of modify_xen_mappings() is quite large. So I would be OK to switch the Arm code to use 'nf' (only in modify_xen_mappings()) for the sake of avoid too much code churn. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.