PCI buses differ from default buses in a few important ways, so it is
important to detect them properly. Normally, PCI buses are expected to
have the following property:
device_type = "pci"
In reality, it is not always the case. To handle PCI bus nodes that
don't have the device_type property, also consider the node name: if the
node name is "pcie" or "pci" then consider the bus as a PCI bus.
This commit is based on the Linux kernel commit
d1ac0002dd29 "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in
pcie nodes".
This fixes Xen boot on RPi4.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
index 18825e333e..f1a96a3b90 100644
--- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
+++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
@@ -563,14 +563,28 @@ static unsigned int dt_bus_default_get_flags(const __be32 *addr)
* PCI bus specific translator
*/
+static bool_t dt_node_is_pci(const struct dt_device_node *np)
+{
+ bool is_pci = !strcmp(np->name, "pcie") || !strcmp(np->name, "pci");
+
+ if (is_pci)
+ printk(XENLOG_WARNING "%s: Missing device_type\n", np->full_name);
+
+ return is_pci;
+}
+
static bool_t dt_bus_pci_match(const struct dt_device_node *np)
{
/*
* "pciex" is PCI Express "vci" is for the /chaos bridge on 1st-gen PCI
* powermacs "ht" is hypertransport
+ *
+ * If none of the device_type match, and that the node name is
+ * "pcie" or "pci", accept the device as PCI (with a warning).
*/
return !strcmp(np->type, "pci") || !strcmp(np->type, "pciex") ||
- !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht");
+ !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht") ||
+ dt_node_is_pci(np);
}
static void dt_bus_pci_count_cells(const struct dt_device_node *np,
Hi Stefano,
> On 8 Feb 2021, at 23:56, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> PCI buses differ from default buses in a few important ways, so it is
> important to detect them properly. Normally, PCI buses are expected to
> have the following property:
>
> device_type = "pci"
>
> In reality, it is not always the case. To handle PCI bus nodes that
> don't have the device_type property, also consider the node name: if the
> node name is "pcie" or "pci" then consider the bus as a PCI bus.
>
> This commit is based on the Linux kernel commit
> d1ac0002dd29 "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in
> pcie nodes".
>
> This fixes Xen boot on RPi4.
We are really handling here a wrong device-tree bug that could easily be fixed
by the user.
We should at least mention in the commit message that this is a workaround
to solve RPi4 buggy device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> index 18825e333e..f1a96a3b90 100644
> --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
> +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> @@ -563,14 +563,28 @@ static unsigned int dt_bus_default_get_flags(const __be32 *addr)
> * PCI bus specific translator
> */
>
> +static bool_t dt_node_is_pci(const struct dt_device_node *np)
> +{
> + bool is_pci = !strcmp(np->name, "pcie") || !strcmp(np->name, "pci");
The Linux commit is a bit more restrictive and only does that for “pcie”.
Any reason why you also want to have this workaround done also for “pci” ?
Cheers
Bertrand
> +
> + if (is_pci)
> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "%s: Missing device_type\n", np->full_name);
> +
> + return is_pci;
> +}
> +
> static bool_t dt_bus_pci_match(const struct dt_device_node *np)
> {
> /*
> * "pciex" is PCI Express "vci" is for the /chaos bridge on 1st-gen PCI
> * powermacs "ht" is hypertransport
> + *
> + * If none of the device_type match, and that the node name is
> + * "pcie" or "pci", accept the device as PCI (with a warning).
> */
> return !strcmp(np->type, "pci") || !strcmp(np->type, "pciex") ||
> - !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht");
> + !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht") ||
> + dt_node_is_pci(np);
> }
>
> static void dt_bus_pci_count_cells(const struct dt_device_node *np,
>
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> > On 8 Feb 2021, at 23:56, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > PCI buses differ from default buses in a few important ways, so it is
> > important to detect them properly. Normally, PCI buses are expected to
> > have the following property:
> >
> > device_type = "pci"
> >
> > In reality, it is not always the case. To handle PCI bus nodes that
> > don't have the device_type property, also consider the node name: if the
> > node name is "pcie" or "pci" then consider the bus as a PCI bus.
> >
> > This commit is based on the Linux kernel commit
> > d1ac0002dd29 "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in
> > pcie nodes".
> >
> > This fixes Xen boot on RPi4.
>
> We are really handling here a wrong device-tree bug that could easily be fixed
> by the user.
> We should at least mention in the commit message that this is a workaround
> to solve RPi4 buggy device tree.
Not sure if it can be "easily" fixed by the user -- it took me a few
hours to figure out what the problem was, and I know Xen and device tree
pretty well :-)
Yes it would be good to have a link to the discussion in the commit
message, using the Link tag. It could be done on commit, or I can add it
to the next version.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/YBmQQ3Tzu++AadKx@mattapan.m5p.com/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > index 18825e333e..f1a96a3b90 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > @@ -563,14 +563,28 @@ static unsigned int dt_bus_default_get_flags(const __be32 *addr)
> > * PCI bus specific translator
> > */
> >
> > +static bool_t dt_node_is_pci(const struct dt_device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + bool is_pci = !strcmp(np->name, "pcie") || !strcmp(np->name, "pci");
>
> The Linux commit is a bit more restrictive and only does that for “pcie”.
> Any reason why you also want to have this workaround done also for “pci” ?
Yes, that's because in our case the offending node is named "pci" not
"pcie" so the original Linux commit wouldn't cover it.
> > +
> > + if (is_pci)
> > + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "%s: Missing device_type\n", np->full_name);
> > +
> > + return is_pci;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool_t dt_bus_pci_match(const struct dt_device_node *np)
> > {
> > /*
> > * "pciex" is PCI Express "vci" is for the /chaos bridge on 1st-gen PCI
> > * powermacs "ht" is hypertransport
> > + *
> > + * If none of the device_type match, and that the node name is
> > + * "pcie" or "pci", accept the device as PCI (with a warning).
> > */
> > return !strcmp(np->type, "pci") || !strcmp(np->type, "pciex") ||
> > - !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht");
> > + !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht") ||
> > + dt_node_is_pci(np);
> > }
> >
> > static void dt_bus_pci_count_cells(const struct dt_device_node *np,
> >
>
>
Hi Stefano,
On 09/02/2021 17:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>>> On 8 Feb 2021, at 23:56, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> PCI buses differ from default buses in a few important ways, so it is
>>> important to detect them properly. Normally, PCI buses are expected to
>>> have the following property:
>>>
>>> device_type = "pci"
>>>
>>> In reality, it is not always the case. To handle PCI bus nodes that
>>> don't have the device_type property, also consider the node name: if the
>>> node name is "pcie" or "pci" then consider the bus as a PCI bus.
>>>
>>> This commit is based on the Linux kernel commit
>>> d1ac0002dd29 "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in
>>> pcie nodes".
>>>
>>> This fixes Xen boot on RPi4.
I am a bit confused with this sentence... How did you manage to boot Xen
on RPi4 before hand?
>>
>> We are really handling here a wrong device-tree bug that could easily be fixed
>> by the user.
>> We should at least mention in the commit message that this is a workaround
>> to solve RPi4 buggy device tree.
>
> Not sure if it can be "easily" fixed by the user -- it took me a few
> hours to figure out what the problem was, and I know Xen and device tree
> pretty well :-)
>
> Yes it would be good to have a link to the discussion in the commit
> message, using the Link tag. It could be done on commit, or I can add it
> to the next version.
A summary of the discussion would be useful in the commit message so a
reader can easily make the connection between the Linux commit and the
Xen one.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/YBmQQ3Tzu++AadKx@mattapan.m5p.com/
>
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
>>> index 18825e333e..f1a96a3b90 100644
>>> --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
>>> @@ -563,14 +563,28 @@ static unsigned int dt_bus_default_get_flags(const __be32 *addr)
>>> * PCI bus specific translator
>>> */
>>>
>>> +static bool_t dt_node_is_pci(const struct dt_device_node *np)
>>> +{
>>> + bool is_pci = !strcmp(np->name, "pcie") || !strcmp(np->name, "pci");
>>
>> The Linux commit is a bit more restrictive and only does that for “pcie”.
>> Any reason why you also want to have this workaround done also for “pci” ?
>
> Yes, that's because in our case the offending node is named "pci" not
> "pcie" so the original Linux commit wouldn't cover it.
>
>
>>> +
>>> + if (is_pci)
>>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "%s: Missing device_type\n", np->full_name);
>>> +
>>> + return is_pci;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static bool_t dt_bus_pci_match(const struct dt_device_node *np)
>>> {
>>> /*
>>> * "pciex" is PCI Express "vci" is for the /chaos bridge on 1st-gen PCI
>>> * powermacs "ht" is hypertransport
>>> + *
>>> + * If none of the device_type match, and that the node name is
>>> + * "pcie" or "pci", accept the device as PCI (with a warning).
>>> */
>>> return !strcmp(np->type, "pci") || !strcmp(np->type, "pciex") ||
>>> - !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht");
>>> + !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht") ||
>>> + dt_node_is_pci(np);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void dt_bus_pci_count_cells(const struct dt_device_node *np,
>>>
>>
--
Julien Grall
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 09/02/2021 17:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > > Hi Stefano,
> > >
> > > > On 8 Feb 2021, at 23:56, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > PCI buses differ from default buses in a few important ways, so it is
> > > > important to detect them properly. Normally, PCI buses are expected to
> > > > have the following property:
> > > >
> > > > device_type = "pci"
> > > >
> > > > In reality, it is not always the case. To handle PCI bus nodes that
> > > > don't have the device_type property, also consider the node name: if the
> > > > node name is "pcie" or "pci" then consider the bus as a PCI bus.
> > > >
> > > > This commit is based on the Linux kernel commit
> > > > d1ac0002dd29 "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in
> > > > pcie nodes".
> > > >
> > > > This fixes Xen boot on RPi4.
> I am a bit confused with this sentence... How did you manage to boot Xen on
> RPi4 before hand?
The older rpi kernel that I was using didn't have the problematic pci
node in device tree at all.
> > > We are really handling here a wrong device-tree bug that could easily be
> > > fixed
> > > by the user.
> > > We should at least mention in the commit message that this is a workaround
> > > to solve RPi4 buggy device tree.
> >
> > Not sure if it can be "easily" fixed by the user -- it took me a few
> > hours to figure out what the problem was, and I know Xen and device tree
> > pretty well :-)
> >
> > Yes it would be good to have a link to the discussion in the commit
> > message, using the Link tag. It could be done on commit, or I can add it
> > to the next version.
>
> A summary of the discussion would be useful in the commit message so a reader
> can easily make the connection between the Linux commit and the Xen one.
OK, good idea
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/YBmQQ3Tzu++AadKx@mattapan.m5p.com/
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > > > index 18825e333e..f1a96a3b90 100644
> > > > --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > > > +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> > > > @@ -563,14 +563,28 @@ static unsigned int dt_bus_default_get_flags(const
> > > > __be32 *addr)
> > > > * PCI bus specific translator
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > +static bool_t dt_node_is_pci(const struct dt_device_node *np)
> > > > +{
> > > > + bool is_pci = !strcmp(np->name, "pcie") || !strcmp(np->name,
> > > > "pci");
> > >
> > > The Linux commit is a bit more restrictive and only does that for “pcie”.
> > > Any reason why you also want to have this workaround done also for “pci” ?
> >
> > Yes, that's because in our case the offending node is named "pci" not
> > "pcie" so the original Linux commit wouldn't cover it.
> >
> >
> > > > +
> > > > + if (is_pci)
> > > > + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "%s: Missing device_type\n",
> > > > np->full_name);
> > > > +
> > > > + return is_pci;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static bool_t dt_bus_pci_match(const struct dt_device_node *np)
> > > > {
> > > > /*
> > > > * "pciex" is PCI Express "vci" is for the /chaos bridge on 1st-gen
> > > > PCI
> > > > * powermacs "ht" is hypertransport
> > > > + *
> > > > + * If none of the device_type match, and that the node name is
> > > > + * "pcie" or "pci", accept the device as PCI (with a warning).
> > > > */
> > > > return !strcmp(np->type, "pci") || !strcmp(np->type, "pciex") ||
> > > > - !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht");
> > > > + !strcmp(np->type, "vci") || !strcmp(np->type, "ht") ||
> > > > + dt_node_is_pci(np);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static void dt_bus_pci_count_cells(const struct dt_device_node *np,
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.