The size of buf is calculated wrongly: the number is 64bit, not 32bit.
Also the number is printed as a hexadecimal number, so we need 8 bytes
for 32bit, not 10 bytes.
As a result, it should be sizeof("cpu@") + 16 bytes for a 64-bit number
+ 1 byte for \0. Total = 21.
Fixes: fafd682c3e (xen/arm: Create a fake cpus node in dom0 device tree)
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- patch added
---
xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 921b054520..60923a7051 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -788,8 +788,8 @@ static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt)
unsigned int cpu;
const void *compatible = NULL;
u32 len;
- /* Placeholder for cpu@ + a 32-bit number + \0 */
- char buf[15];
+ /* Placeholder for cpu@ + a 64-bit number + \0 */
+ char buf[21];
u32 clock_frequency;
bool clock_valid;
uint64_t mpidr_aff;
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Hi Stefano,
On 10/8/19 2:14 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> The size of buf is calculated wrongly: the number is 64bit, not 32bit.
While the variable mpdir_aff is 64-bit, we only write the first 32-bit
in the property reg (#address-cells == 1 and fdt_property_cell()). So
what needs to be modified is the format here.
Also, looking the CPU bindings (see
linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml), technically only
the bits [23:0] of the mpidr should be used. The rest is zeroed.
This is ok because vcpuid_to_vaffinity() is always returning a value
following the requirements above. However, for correctness, this may
want to be fixed.
> Also the number is printed as a hexadecimal number, so we need 8 bytes
> for 32bit, not 10 bytes.
>
> As a result, it should be sizeof("cpu@") + 16 bytes for a 64-bit number
> + 1 byte for \0. Total = 21.
>
> Fixes: fafd682c3e (xen/arm: Create a fake cpus node in dom0 device tree)
I am afraid this is not fixing this patch:
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "cpu@%u", cpu);
So the 10 bytes were actually correct back then.
The problem was introduced by commit c81a791d34 "xen/arm: Set 'reg' of
cpu node for dom0 to match MPIDR's affinity".
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - patch added
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> index 921b054520..60923a7051 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> @@ -788,8 +788,8 @@ static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt)
> unsigned int cpu;
> const void *compatible = NULL;
> u32 len;
> - /* Placeholder for cpu@ + a 32-bit number + \0 */
> - char buf[15];
> + /* Placeholder for cpu@ + a 64-bit number + \0 */
> + char buf[21];
> u32 clock_frequency;
> bool clock_valid;
> uint64_t mpidr_aff;
>
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 10/8/19 2:14 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > The size of buf is calculated wrongly: the number is 64bit, not 32bit.
>
> While the variable mpdir_aff is 64-bit, we only write the first 32-bit in the
> property reg (#address-cells == 1 and fdt_property_cell()). So what needs to
> be modified is the format here.
>
> Also, looking the CPU bindings (see
> linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml), technically only the
> bits [23:0] of the mpidr should be used. The rest is zeroed.
>
> This is ok because vcpuid_to_vaffinity() is always returning a value following
> the requirements above. However, for correctness, this may want to be fixed.
It looks like it would be best to change mpdir_aff to uint32_t and
change vcpuid_to_vaffinity to return a uint32_t.
Then of course the buf allocation would be buf[13].
Is that what you have in mind?
> > Also the number is printed as a hexadecimal number, so we need 8 bytes
> > for 32bit, not 10 bytes.
> >
> > As a result, it should be sizeof("cpu@") + 16 bytes for a 64-bit number
> > + 1 byte for \0. Total = 21.
> >
> > Fixes: fafd682c3e (xen/arm: Create a fake cpus node in dom0 device tree)
>
> I am afraid this is not fixing this patch:
>
> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "cpu@%u", cpu);
>
> So the 10 bytes were actually correct back then.
>
> The problem was introduced by commit c81a791d34 "xen/arm: Set 'reg' of cpu
> node for dom0 to match MPIDR's affinity".
Yes, I'll change it
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - patch added
> > ---
> > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > index 921b054520..60923a7051 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > @@ -788,8 +788,8 @@ static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d,
> > void *fdt)
> > unsigned int cpu;
> > const void *compatible = NULL;
> > u32 len;
> > - /* Placeholder for cpu@ + a 32-bit number + \0 */
> > - char buf[15];
> > + /* Placeholder for cpu@ + a 64-bit number + \0 */
> > + char buf[21];
> > u32 clock_frequency;
> > bool clock_valid;
> > uint64_t mpidr_aff;
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Hi Stefano,
On 08/10/2019 22:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 10/8/19 2:14 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> The size of buf is calculated wrongly: the number is 64bit, not 32bit.
>>
>> While the variable mpdir_aff is 64-bit, we only write the first 32-bit in the
>> property reg (#address-cells == 1 and fdt_property_cell()). So what needs to
>> be modified is the format here.
>>
>> Also, looking the CPU bindings (see
>> linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml), technically only the
>> bits [23:0] of the mpidr should be used. The rest is zeroed.
>>
>> This is ok because vcpuid_to_vaffinity() is always returning a value following
>> the requirements above. However, for correctness, this may want to be fixed.
>
> It looks like it would be best to change mpdir_aff to uint32_t and
> change vcpuid_to_vaffinity to return a uint32_t.
vcpuid_to_vaffinity is meant to return the AFFx bits of the MIDR (so
32-bit on Arm32 and 64-bit on Arm64). We are only using AFF0 and AFF1,
so the rest is zeroed. But this does not mean we should switch to 32-bit.
If we want to change the interface then, it should be register_t and not
32-bit.
However, I didn't suggest to switch to 32-bit but to transfer the bits
[23:0] to a variable and possibly check that the rest is 0.
Maybe something like:
uint32_t reg;
reg = mpidr_aff & GENMASK(23, 0);
/* We only are able to deal with AFF{0, 1, 2} stored in bits [23:0] at
the moment */
if ( reg != mpidr_aff )
{
printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to handle MPIDR AFFINITY 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
mpidr_aff);
return -EINVAL;
}
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.