Hi Anthony,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH for-4.17 v5 00/17] Toolstack build system
> improvement, toward non-recursive makefiles
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 06:26:09AM +0000, Henry Wang wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH for-4.17 v5 00/17] Toolstack build system
> > > improvement, toward non-recursive makefiles
> > >
> > > On 13/10/2022 14:04, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > > > Patch series available in this git branch:
> > > > https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/aperard/xen-unstable.git
> > > br.toolstack-build-system-v5
> > >
> > > I've done a full rebuild of this (with the 2 noted fixes) with Xapi, and
> > > it does resolve the Ocaml library linking issues.� Thanks.
> > >
> > > So T-by.� If an allowance for 4.17 appears, I can see about getting some
> > > of the more obviously-trivial areas reviewed and committed.
> >
> > Release-acked-by: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks.

No problem, my pleasure.

> 
> > Since this series is quite large and just out of curiosity, do we have a
> > pipeline or CI jobs to test all the modules that affected by the makefile
> > touched by this series? Would be good to have some test results to
> > boost our confidence of committing the series.
> 
> I did push my branch to Gitlab, and that the pipeline:
>     https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/anthonyper/xen/-
> /pipelines/665987083
>     (private to xen-project members)
> Only failures are I think the same one as on staging, test failure on
> arm, but no build issues.

Sorry for the arm failure, I will try to respin the patch ASAP and hopefully
the CI will be unblocked soon.

Kind regards,
Henry

> 
> I'm not sure that everything is tested, but most of it is.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Anthony PERARD