RE: [PATCH v10 0/7] IOMMU cleanup

Durrant, Paul posted 7 patches 3 years, 4 months ago
Only 0 patches received!
RE: [PATCH v10 0/7] IOMMU cleanup
Posted by Durrant, Paul 3 years, 4 months ago
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Sent: 27 November 2020 16:22
> To: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
> Cc: Durrant, Paul <pdurrant@amazon.co.uk>; Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>; George Dunlap
> <george.dunlap@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>; Grall, Julien
> <jgrall@amazon.co.uk>; Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>; Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>; Roger
> Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>; Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>; Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>;
> xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v10 0/7] IOMMU cleanup
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open
> attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On 20.11.2020 14:24, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > From: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@amazon.com>
> >
> > This is the remainder of the cleanup series deferred until XSA-346 and
> > XSA-347 were publicly disclosed.
> >
> > Paul Durrant (7):
> >   remove remaining uses of iommu_legacy_map/unmap
> >   common/grant_table: batch flush I/O TLB
> >   iommu: remove the share_p2m operation
> >   iommu: stop calling IOMMU page tables 'p2m tables'
> 
> Are the latter two patches dependent upon the former two, or could
> they go in independently?
> 

Not really. They should be able to go in ahead of the other two.

  Paul

> Jan