[PATCH] x86emul: Cache the amd_like() output on x86_emulate() entry

Alejandro Vallejo posted 1 patch 3 days, 8 hours ago
xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
[PATCH] x86emul: Cache the amd_like() output on x86_emulate() entry
Posted by Alejandro Vallejo 3 days, 8 hours ago
The current code instantiates amd_like() way too many times, leading to
codegen explosion. Unconditionally call it early on, and use that
variable everywhere. This shrinks the emulator by ~3KiB.

No a functional change.

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@amd.com>
---
pipeline: https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/agvallejo/xen/-/pipelines/2860748404
          (it's red because of an caching issue and personal branch name
           conventions it's just arm. x86 passes in full)

bloat-o-meter before-after patch.

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-3366 (-3366)
Function                                     old     new   delta
x86_emulate                               209351  205985   -3366
Total: Before=3617694, After=3614328, chg -0.09%
---
 xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
index 89c37fea2c..c69ef0781e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ do {                                                                    \
 #define jmp_rel(rel)                                                    \
 do {                                                                    \
     unsigned long ip = _regs.r(ip) + (int)(rel);                        \
-    if ( op_bytes == 2 && (amd_like(ctxt) || !mode_64bit()) )           \
+    if ( op_bytes == 2 && (is_amd_like || !mode_64bit()) )              \
         ip = (uint16_t)ip;                                              \
     else if ( !mode_64bit() )                                           \
         ip = (uint32_t)ip;                                              \
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static inline void put_loop_count(
          * zero extend relevant registers first when using 32-bit       \
          * addressing in 64-bit mode.                                   \
          */                                                             \
-        if ( !amd_like(ctxt) && mode_64bit() && ad_bytes == 4 )         \
+        if ( !is_amd_like && mode_64bit() && ad_bytes == 4 )            \
         {                                                               \
             _regs.r(cx) = 0;                                            \
             if ( extend_si ) _regs.r(si) = (uint32_t)_regs.r(si);       \
@@ -1310,6 +1310,7 @@ x86_emulate(
     /* Shadow copy of register state. Committed on successful emulation. */
     struct cpu_user_regs _regs = *ctxt->regs;
     const struct cpu_policy *__maybe_unused cp = ctxt->cpu_policy;
+    bool is_amd_like = amd_like(ctxt);
     struct x86_emulate_state state;
     int rc;
     uint8_t b, d, *opc = NULL;
@@ -1810,7 +1811,7 @@ x86_emulate(
             if ( ea.type == OP_REG )
                 src.val = *ea.reg;
             else if ( (rc = read_ulong(ea.mem.seg, ea.mem.off, &src.val,
-                                       (op_bytes == 2 && !amd_like(ctxt)
+                                       (op_bytes == 2 && !is_amd_like
                                         ? 2 : 4),
                                        ctxt, ops)) )
                 goto done;
@@ -2356,7 +2357,7 @@ x86_emulate(
 
     case 0xc2: /* ret imm16 (near) */
     case 0xc3: /* ret (near) */
-        op_bytes = (op_bytes == 4 || !amd_like(ctxt)) && mode_64bit()
+        op_bytes = (op_bytes == 4 || !is_amd_like) && mode_64bit()
                    ? 8 : op_bytes;
         if ( (rc = read_ulong(x86_seg_ss, sp_post_inc(op_bytes + src.val),
                               &dst.val, op_bytes, ctxt, ops)) != 0 ||
@@ -3089,7 +3090,7 @@ x86_emulate(
         if ( (rc = ops->read_msr(MSR_EFER, &msr_val, ctxt)) != X86EMUL_OKAY )
             goto done;
         generate_exception_if((msr_val & EFER_SCE) == 0, X86_EXC_UD);
-        generate_exception_if(!amd_like(ctxt) && !mode_64bit(), X86_EXC_UD);
+        generate_exception_if(!is_amd_like && !mode_64bit(), X86_EXC_UD);
 
         if ( (rc = ops->read_msr(MSR_STAR, &msr_val, ctxt)) != X86EMUL_OKAY )
             goto done;
@@ -3174,7 +3175,7 @@ x86_emulate(
         if ( (rc = ops->read_msr(MSR_EFER, &msr_val, ctxt)) != X86EMUL_OKAY )
             goto done;
         generate_exception_if(!(msr_val & EFER_SCE), X86_EXC_UD);
-        generate_exception_if(!amd_like(ctxt) && !mode_64bit(), X86_EXC_UD);
+        generate_exception_if(!is_amd_like && !mode_64bit(), X86_EXC_UD);
         generate_exception_if(!mode_ring0(), X86_EXC_GP, 0);
         generate_exception_if(!in_protmode(ctxt, ops), X86_EXC_GP, 0);
 #ifdef __x86_64__
@@ -3200,7 +3201,7 @@ x86_emulate(
         sreg.attr = 0xcf3; /* G+DB+P+DPL3+S+Data */
 
         /* Only the selector part of SS gets updated by AMD and alike. */
-        if ( amd_like(ctxt) )
+        if ( is_amd_like )
         {
             fail_if(!ops->read_segment);
             if ( (rc = ops->read_segment(x86_seg_ss, &sreg,
@@ -3924,7 +3925,7 @@ x86_emulate(
 
     case X86EMUL_OPC(0x0f, 0x34): /* sysenter */
         vcpu_must_have(sep);
-        generate_exception_if(amd_like(ctxt) && ctxt->lma, X86_EXC_UD);
+        generate_exception_if(is_amd_like && ctxt->lma, X86_EXC_UD);
         generate_exception_if(!in_protmode(ctxt, ops), X86_EXC_GP, 0);
 
         fail_if(ops->read_msr == NULL);
@@ -3973,7 +3974,7 @@ x86_emulate(
 
     case X86EMUL_OPC(0x0f, 0x35): /* sysexit */
         vcpu_must_have(sep);
-        generate_exception_if(amd_like(ctxt) && ctxt->lma, X86_EXC_UD);
+        generate_exception_if(is_amd_like && ctxt->lma, X86_EXC_UD);
         generate_exception_if(!mode_ring0(), X86_EXC_GP, 0);
         generate_exception_if(!in_protmode(ctxt, ops), X86_EXC_GP, 0);
 

base-commit: adbbbd47a1fad8e3bc1ab65c555f11d831fd6681
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH] x86emul: Cache the amd_like() output on x86_emulate() entry
Posted by Jan Beulich 2 days, 4 hours ago
On 21.09.2026 11:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> The current code instantiates amd_like() way too many times, leading to
> codegen explosion. Unconditionally call it early on, and use that
> variable everywhere. This shrinks the emulator by ~3KiB.
> 
> No a functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@amd.com>
> ---
> pipeline: https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/agvallejo/xen/-/pipelines/2860748404
>           (it's red because of an caching issue and personal branch name
>            conventions it's just arm. x86 passes in full)
> 
> bloat-o-meter before-after patch.
> 
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-3366 (-3366)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> x86_emulate                               209351  205985   -3366
> Total: Before=3617694, After=3614328, chg -0.09%

That's surprisingly big a difference, considering how simple amd_like() is.
I'm counting 24 instances, so the savings would be well over 100 bytes per
instance.

That said - there are more uses, and I wonder why you ...

> @@ -1310,6 +1310,7 @@ x86_emulate(
>      /* Shadow copy of register state. Committed on successful emulation. */
>      struct cpu_user_regs _regs = *ctxt->regs;
>      const struct cpu_policy *__maybe_unused cp = ctxt->cpu_policy;
> +    bool is_amd_like = amd_like(ctxt);
>      struct x86_emulate_state state;

... make a standalone local variable here when you could introduce a new
field in struct x86_emulate_state, which would then filled early in
x86emul_decode(), and which could then be used elsewhere as well. With
that amd_like() could then likely also move from private.h to decode.c;
better yet - perhaps the function then wouldn't be needed at all anymore.

Another way to reduce the overhead at least some would be to make more use
of _amd_like(), now that x86_emulate() has a "cp" local variable.

Jan
Re: [PATCH] x86emul: Cache the amd_like() output on x86_emulate() entry
Posted by Alejandro Vallejo 2 days ago
On Tue Sep 22, 2026 at 3:34 PM CEST, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.09.2026 11:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > The current code instantiates amd_like() way too many times, leading to
> > codegen explosion. Unconditionally call it early on, and use that
> > variable everywhere. This shrinks the emulator by ~3KiB.
> > 
> > No a functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@amd.com>
> > ---
> > pipeline: https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/agvallejo/xen/-/pipelines/2860748404
> >           (it's red because of an caching issue and personal branch name
> >            conventions it's just arm. x86 passes in full)
> > 
> > bloat-o-meter before-after patch.
> > 
> > add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-3366 (-3366)
> > Function                                     old     new   delta
> > x86_emulate                               209351  205985   -3366
> > Total: Before=3617694, After=3614328, chg -0.09%
>
> That's surprisingly big a difference, considering how simple amd_like() is.
> I'm counting 24 instances, so the savings would be well over 100 bytes per
> instance.

I have some more interesting results. I can very much repro at that
commit with GCC 13 with debug=y, but ALSO the variable must be set at
the tail of all other locals. I never noticed the gain was gone after
moving where it is in this patch.

Clearly I misattributed the origin of the shrinkage. In retrospect, it
turns out to be an unrelated matter. I _THINK_ register pressure is
somehow precluding the inlining of a helper. The problem is gone in
debug=n where CSE ensures all is good.

If I find a way of shrinking debug builds in a way that's more resilient
to compiler specifics I'll push that as a separate patch, but for now
I'll just drop this. Clearly it doesn't matter here for a realistic
build.

Apologies for the noise. Codegen is hard :)

Alejandro