xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 10 ++++++---- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
On ARMv8.4-A and newer platforms, booting Dom0 Linux with ACPI enabled
causes the domain to probe advanced PMU feature based on system ID
register ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.
During this probe, Linux accesses PMMIR_EL1, which causes unhandled
register traps and crashes the domain. Merely adding emulation code
for PMMIR_EL1 in Xen is insufficient to fix the issue, as the guest
PMU driver subsequently stalls during its initialization sequence.
Fix this by explicitly masking PMU capability fields in
create_domain_cpuinfo(). Additionally, preemptively mask other
capability fields to prevent similar potential issues.
Fixes: 3669a1cb9598 "xen/arm: create a cpuinfo structure for guest"
Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
---
xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 10 ++++++----
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c b/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
index 94d14fb6a9..71d745d3cb 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
@@ -219,8 +219,24 @@ static int __init create_domain_cpuinfo(void)
domain_cpuinfo.isa64.api = 0;
domain_cpuinfo.isa64.gpa = 0;
domain_cpuinfo.isa64.gpi = 0;
+
+ /* Hide PMUv3 support as Xen does not support it */
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pmu_ver = 0;
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.mtpmu = 0;
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pmss = 0;
+
+ /* Hide SPE, TRBE, BRBE, and Trace Extensions */
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pms_ver = 0;
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_ver = 0;
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_filt = 0;
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_buffer = 0;
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.ext_trc_buff = 0;
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.brbe = 0;
#endif
+ /* Hide PMUv1,v2 support as Xen does not support it */
+ domain_cpuinfo.dbg32.perfmon = 0;
+
/* Hide AMU support */
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
domain_cpuinfo.pfr64.amu = 0;
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index bf902a3970..c92b2651c7 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -216,16 +216,18 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
unsigned long trace_ver:4;
unsigned long pmu_ver:4;
unsigned long brps:4;
- unsigned long __res0:4;
+ unsigned long pmss:4;
unsigned long wrps:4;
- unsigned long __res1:4;
+ unsigned long sebep:4;
unsigned long ctx_cmps:4;
unsigned long pms_ver:4;
unsigned long double_lock:4;
unsigned long trace_filt:4;
- unsigned long __res2:4;
+ unsigned long trace_buffer:4;
unsigned long mtpmu:4;
- unsigned long __res3:12;
+ unsigned long brbe:4;
+ unsigned long ext_trc_buff:4;
+ unsigned long hpmn0:4;
/* DFR1 */
unsigned long __res4:64;
--
2.43.0
Hi,
On 03/08/2026 01:42, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> On ARMv8.4-A and newer platforms, booting Dom0 Linux with ACPI enabled
> causes the domain to probe advanced PMU feature based on system ID
> register ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.
>
> During this probe, Linux accesses PMMIR_EL1, which causes unhandled
> register traps and crashes the domain. Merely adding emulation code
> for PMMIR_EL1 in Xen is insufficient to fix the issue, as the guest
> PMU driver subsequently stalls during its initialization sequence.
>
> Fix this by explicitly masking PMU capability fields in
> create_domain_cpuinfo(). Additionally, preemptively mask other
> capability fields to prevent similar potential issues.
While I agree Xen doesn't support PMU capability for every guest, I
believe we are still allowing to expose the PMU in some cases (see
commit dbb948110a "xen: Expose the PMU to the guests"). So we can't
simply mask the features. So I think ...
>
> Fixes: 3669a1cb9598 "xen/arm: create a cpuinfo structure for guest"
> Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 10 ++++++----
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c b/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
> index 94d14fb6a9..71d745d3cb 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
> @@ -219,8 +219,24 @@ static int __init create_domain_cpuinfo(void)
> domain_cpuinfo.isa64.api = 0;
> domain_cpuinfo.isa64.gpa = 0;
> domain_cpuinfo.isa64.gpi = 0;
> +
> + /* Hide PMUv3 support as Xen does not support it */
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pmu_ver = 0;
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.mtpmu = 0;
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pmss = 0;
... this section needs to be conditional.
> +
> + /* Hide SPE, TRBE, BRBE, and Trace Extensions */
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pms_ver = 0;
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_ver = 0;
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_filt = 0;
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_buffer = 0;
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.ext_trc_buff = 0;
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.brbe = 0;
This section should be fine to unconditionally mask.
> #endif
>
> + /* Hide PMUv1,v2 support as Xen does not support it */
> + domain_cpuinfo.dbg32.perfmon = 0;
> +
> /* Hide AMU support */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
> domain_cpuinfo.pfr64.amu = 0;
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index bf902a3970..c92b2651c7 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -216,16 +216,18 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
> unsigned long trace_ver:4;
> unsigned long pmu_ver:4;
> unsigned long brps:4;
> - unsigned long __res0:4;
> + unsigned long pmss:4;
> unsigned long wrps:4;
> - unsigned long __res1:4;
> + unsigned long sebep:4;
> unsigned long ctx_cmps:4;
> unsigned long pms_ver:4;
> unsigned long double_lock:4;
> unsigned long trace_filt:4;
> - unsigned long __res2:4;
> + unsigned long trace_buffer:4;
> unsigned long mtpmu:4;
> - unsigned long __res3:12;
> + unsigned long brbe:4;
> + unsigned long ext_trc_buff:4;
> + unsigned long hpmn0:4;
>
> /* DFR1 */
> unsigned long __res4:64;
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
Hi,
Thank you for the comments.
> > During this probe, Linux accesses PMMIR_EL1, which causes unhandled
> > register traps and crashes the domain. Merely adding emulation code
> > for PMMIR_EL1 in Xen is insufficient to fix the issue, as the guest
> > PMU driver subsequently stalls during its initialization sequence.
> >
> > Fix this by explicitly masking PMU capability fields in
> > create_domain_cpuinfo(). Additionally, preemptively mask other
> > capability fields to prevent similar potential issues.
>
> While I agree Xen doesn't support PMU capability for every guest, I
> believe we are still allowing to expose the PMU in some cases (see
> commit dbb948110a "xen: Expose the PMU to the guests"). So we can't
> simply mask the features. So I think ...
I will modify the sysreg trap handler for ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 to dynamically
mask the basic PMU capabilities based on the domain's vPMU
configuration.
> > Fixes: 3669a1cb9598 "xen/arm: create a cpuinfo structure for guest"
> > Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
> > ---
> > xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 10 ++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c b/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
> > index 94d14fb6a9..71d745d3cb 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/cpufeature.c
> > @@ -219,8 +219,24 @@ static int __init create_domain_cpuinfo(void)
> > domain_cpuinfo.isa64.api = 0;
> > domain_cpuinfo.isa64.gpa = 0;
> > domain_cpuinfo.isa64.gpi = 0;
> > +
> > + /* Hide PMUv3 support as Xen does not support it */
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pmu_ver = 0;
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.mtpmu = 0;
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pmss = 0;
>
> ... this section needs to be conditional.
Okay.
> > +
> > + /* Hide SPE, TRBE, BRBE, and Trace Extensions */
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.pms_ver = 0;
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_ver = 0;
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_filt = 0;
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.trace_buffer = 0;
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.ext_trc_buff = 0;
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg64.brbe = 0;
>
> This section should be fine to unconditionally mask.
Okay.
> > #endif
> >
> > + /* Hide PMUv1,v2 support as Xen does not support it */
> > + domain_cpuinfo.dbg32.perfmon = 0;
> > +
> > /* Hide AMU support */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
> > domain_cpuinfo.pfr64.amu = 0;
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > index bf902a3970..c92b2651c7 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > @@ -216,16 +216,18 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
> > unsigned long trace_ver:4;
> > unsigned long pmu_ver:4;
> > unsigned long brps:4;
> > - unsigned long __res0:4;
> > + unsigned long pmss:4;
> > unsigned long wrps:4;
> > - unsigned long __res1:4;
> > + unsigned long sebep:4;
> > unsigned long ctx_cmps:4;
> > unsigned long pms_ver:4;
> > unsigned long double_lock:4;
> > unsigned long trace_filt:4;
> > - unsigned long __res2:4;
> > + unsigned long trace_buffer:4;
> > unsigned long mtpmu:4;
> > - unsigned long __res3:12;
> > + unsigned long brbe:4;
> > + unsigned long ext_trc_buff:4;
> > + unsigned long hpmn0:4;
> >
> > /* DFR1 */
> > unsigned long __res4:64;
Thak you,
Hirokazu Takahashi.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.