automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
The *-safety jobs are AMD's configuration specifically, and other
configurations will likely be different.
Give the un-suffixed job an *-all suffix to make it clearer what they're
doing.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@vates.tech>
CC: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
CC: consulting@bugseng.com <consulting@bugseng.com>
CC: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
---
automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml b/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml
index 20cabbe5f70c..37a941bebbae 100644
--- a/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml
+++ b/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
allow_failure: true
- !reference [.eclair-analysis, rules]
-eclair-x86_64:
+eclair-x86_64-all:
extends: .eclair-analysis:triggered
variables:
LOGFILE: "eclair-x86_64.log"
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ eclair-x86_64-testing:
when: always
- !reference [.eclair-analysis:triggered, rules]
-eclair-x86_64-safety:
+eclair-x86_64-amd:
extends: eclair-x86_64
tags:
- eclair-analysis-safety
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ eclair-x86_64-safety:
when: always
- !reference [.eclair-analysis:triggered, rules]
-eclair-ARM64:
+eclair-ARM64-all:
extends: .eclair-analysis:triggered
variables:
LOGFILE: "eclair-ARM64.log"
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ eclair-ARM64-testing:
when: always
- !reference [.eclair-analysis:triggered, rules]
-eclair-ARM64-safety:
+eclair-ARM64-amd:
extends: eclair-ARM64
tags:
- eclair-analysis-safety
base-commit: abac3b76d20ebecb339cb41bb8982796bf1ce276
--
2.39.5
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: > The *-safety jobs are AMD's configuration specifically, and other > configurations will likely be different. > > Give the un-suffixed job an *-all suffix to make it clearer what they're > doing. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> This is straightforward: Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> I like this and I think we should also rename eclair-x86_64:on-schedule and eclair-ARM64:on-schedule for extra clarity. For instance: eclair-x86_64-allrules:on-schedule eclair-ARM64-allrules:on-schedule It could be in this patch but also in a different patch. > --- > CC: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@vates.tech> > CC: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com> > CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > CC: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> > CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> > CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > CC: consulting@bugseng.com <consulting@bugseng.com> > CC: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com> > --- > automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml b/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml > index 20cabbe5f70c..37a941bebbae 100644 > --- a/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml > +++ b/automation/gitlab-ci/analyze.yaml > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ > allow_failure: true > - !reference [.eclair-analysis, rules] > > -eclair-x86_64: > +eclair-x86_64-all: > extends: .eclair-analysis:triggered > variables: > LOGFILE: "eclair-x86_64.log" > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ eclair-x86_64-testing: > when: always > - !reference [.eclair-analysis:triggered, rules] > > -eclair-x86_64-safety: > +eclair-x86_64-amd: > extends: eclair-x86_64 > tags: > - eclair-analysis-safety > @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ eclair-x86_64-safety: > when: always > - !reference [.eclair-analysis:triggered, rules] > > -eclair-ARM64: > +eclair-ARM64-all: > extends: .eclair-analysis:triggered > variables: > LOGFILE: "eclair-ARM64.log" > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ eclair-ARM64-testing: > when: always > - !reference [.eclair-analysis:triggered, rules] > > -eclair-ARM64-safety: > +eclair-ARM64-amd: > extends: eclair-ARM64 > tags: > - eclair-analysis-safety > > base-commit: abac3b76d20ebecb339cb41bb8982796bf1ce276 > -- > 2.39.5 >
On 11/12/2025 5:59 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> The *-safety jobs are AMD's configuration specifically, and other >> configurations will likely be different. >> >> Give the un-suffixed job an *-all suffix to make it clearer what they're >> doing. >> >> No functional change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> > This is straightforward: > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > > I like this and I think we should also rename eclair-x86_64:on-schedule > and eclair-ARM64:on-schedule for extra clarity. For instance: > > eclair-x86_64-allrules:on-schedule > eclair-ARM64-allrules:on-schedule > > It could be in this patch but also in a different patch. Oh, that's easy enough to do. I'll fold in. Given allrules for that, do we want to make this allcode for clarity? ~Andrew
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 11/12/2025 5:59 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> The *-safety jobs are AMD's configuration specifically, and other > >> configurations will likely be different. > >> > >> Give the un-suffixed job an *-all suffix to make it clearer what they're > >> doing. > >> > >> No functional change. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> > > This is straightforward: > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > > > > I like this and I think we should also rename eclair-x86_64:on-schedule > > and eclair-ARM64:on-schedule for extra clarity. For instance: > > > > eclair-x86_64-allrules:on-schedule > > eclair-ARM64-allrules:on-schedule > > > > It could be in this patch but also in a different patch. > > Oh, that's easy enough to do. I'll fold in. > > Given allrules for that, do we want to make this allcode for clarity? I am happy with that, good idea
On 11/12/2025 6:05 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 11/12/2025 5:59 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>> The *-safety jobs are AMD's configuration specifically, and other >>>> configurations will likely be different. >>>> >>>> Give the un-suffixed job an *-all suffix to make it clearer what they're >>>> doing. >>>> >>>> No functional change. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> >>> This is straightforward: >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> >>> >>> I like this and I think we should also rename eclair-x86_64:on-schedule >>> and eclair-ARM64:on-schedule for extra clarity. For instance: >>> >>> eclair-x86_64-allrules:on-schedule >>> eclair-ARM64-allrules:on-schedule >>> >>> It could be in this patch but also in a different patch. >> Oh, that's easy enough to do. I'll fold in. >> >> Given allrules for that, do we want to make this allcode for clarity? > I am happy with that, good idea Ok, I'll fold that in too. Thanks. ~Andrew
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.