This is preparatory work for the upcoming commits that implement the
standard PV time interface (ARM DEN 0057A).
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
---
xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 4ff161887ec3..9d44b6fa9470 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -1070,6 +1070,23 @@ static int __init find_host_extended_regions(const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
return res;
}
+static int __init find_unused_regions(struct domain *d,
+ const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
+ struct membanks *ext_regions)
+{
+ if ( domain_use_host_layout(d) )
+ {
+ if ( !is_iommu_enabled(d) )
+ return find_host_extended_regions(kinfo, ext_regions);
+ else
+ return find_memory_holes(kinfo, ext_regions);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ return find_domU_holes(kinfo, ext_regions);
+ }
+}
+
int __init make_hypervisor_node(struct domain *d,
const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
int addrcells, int sizecells)
@@ -1121,17 +1138,7 @@ int __init make_hypervisor_node(struct domain *d,
if ( !ext_regions )
return -ENOMEM;
- if ( domain_use_host_layout(d) )
- {
- if ( !is_iommu_enabled(d) )
- res = find_host_extended_regions(kinfo, ext_regions);
- else
- res = find_memory_holes(kinfo, ext_regions);
- }
- else
- {
- res = find_domU_holes(kinfo, ext_regions);
- }
+ res = find_unused_regions(d, kinfo, ext_regions);
if ( res )
printk(XENLOG_WARNING "%pd: failed to allocate extended regions\n",
--
2.48.1
On 21/06/2025 17:11, Koichiro Den wrote:
> This is preparatory work for the upcoming commits that implement the
> standard PV time interface (ARM DEN 0057A).
I personally don't find such messages useful. If at all, reasoning should be
given first and then this message could appear.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> index 4ff161887ec3..9d44b6fa9470 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,23 @@ static int __init find_host_extended_regions(const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
> return res;
> }
>
> +static int __init find_unused_regions(struct domain *d,
> + const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
Let's not propagate unjustified (IMO) behavior of passing both domain and kinfo
pointers. The latter contains the domain member and therefore is sufficient as
argument.
> + struct membanks *ext_regions)
> +{
> + if ( domain_use_host_layout(d) )
> + {
> + if ( !is_iommu_enabled(d) )
> + return find_host_extended_regions(kinfo, ext_regions);
> + else
> + return find_memory_holes(kinfo, ext_regions);
> + }
> + else
> + {
You can take opportunity to drop unneeded braces
Otherwise, LGTM.
~Michal
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 03:33:55PM +0200, Orzel, Michal wrote:
>
Thank you for the review + apologies for my delayed response.
>
> On 21/06/2025 17:11, Koichiro Den wrote:
> > This is preparatory work for the upcoming commits that implement the
> > standard PV time interface (ARM DEN 0057A).
> I personally don't find such messages useful. If at all, reasoning should be
> given first and then this message could appear.
Right, I'll rewrite the commit message.
>
> >
> > No functional changes intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> > ---
> > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > index 4ff161887ec3..9d44b6fa9470 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > @@ -1070,6 +1070,23 @@ static int __init find_host_extended_regions(const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
> > return res;
> > }
> >
> > +static int __init find_unused_regions(struct domain *d,
> > + const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
> Let's not propagate unjustified (IMO) behavior of passing both domain and kinfo
> pointers. The latter contains the domain member and therefore is sufficient as
> argument.
Thanks for pointing that out, I'll do so in the next take.
>
> > + struct membanks *ext_regions)
> > +{
> > + if ( domain_use_host_layout(d) )
> > + {
> > + if ( !is_iommu_enabled(d) )
> > + return find_host_extended_regions(kinfo, ext_regions);
> > + else
> > + return find_memory_holes(kinfo, ext_regions);
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> You can take opportunity to drop unneeded braces
Will update this part in v2. Thank you!
>
> Otherwise, LGTM.
>
> ~Michal
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.