The notification bitmask is in passed in the FF-A ABI in two 32-bit
registers w3 and w4. The lower 32-bits should go in w3 and the higher in
w4. These two registers has unfortunately been swapped for
FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND and FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in the FF-A mediator.
So fix that by using the correct registers.
Fixes: b490f470f58d ("xen/arm: ffa: support notification")
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
---
xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
index 21b9e78f6399..00efaf8f7353 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
* We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the sender
* endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
*/
- return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_hi,
- bitmap_lo);
+ return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_lo,
+ bitmap_hi);
}
int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
* We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the
* destination endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
*/
- return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_hi,
- bitmap_lo);
+ return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_lo,
+ bitmap_hi);
}
void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
--
2.43.0
Hi Jens,
Thanks a lot for the finding.
> On 3 Feb 2025, at 11:21, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The notification bitmask is in passed in the FF-A ABI in two 32-bit
> registers w3 and w4. The lower 32-bits should go in w3 and the higher in
> w4. These two registers has unfortunately been swapped for
> FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND and FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in the FF-A mediator.
> So fix that by using the correct registers.
>
> Fixes: b490f470f58d ("xen/arm: ffa: support notification")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>
@Oleksii: This is a fix of a bug, can this be considered for 4.20 ?
Thanks
Bertrand
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
> index 21b9e78f6399..00efaf8f7353 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
> @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> * We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the sender
> * endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
> */
> - return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_hi,
> - bitmap_lo);
> + return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_lo,
> + bitmap_hi);
> }
>
> int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> * We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the
> * destination endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
> */
> - return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_hi,
> - bitmap_lo);
> + return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_lo,
> + bitmap_hi);
> }
>
> void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Hi Bertrand,
On 2/3/25 11:42 AM, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Thanks a lot for the finding.
>
>> On 3 Feb 2025, at 11:21, Jens Wiklander<jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The notification bitmask is in passed in the FF-A ABI in two 32-bit
>> registers w3 and w4. The lower 32-bits should go in w3 and the higher in
>> w4. These two registers has unfortunately been swapped for
>> FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND and FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in the FF-A mediator.
>> So fix that by using the correct registers.
>>
>> Fixes: b490f470f58d ("xen/arm: ffa: support notification")
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander<jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis<bertrand.marquis@arm.com>
>
> @Oleksii: This is a fix of a bug, can this be considered for 4.20 ?
The fix is straightforward, so let's include this fix in 4.20:
R-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
Thanks.
~ Oleksii
>
> Thanks
> Bertrand
>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
>> index 21b9e78f6399..00efaf8f7353 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
>> @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> * We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the sender
>> * endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
>> */
>> - return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_hi,
>> - bitmap_lo);
>> + return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags, bitmap_lo,
>> + bitmap_hi);
>> }
>>
>> int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> * We only support notifications from SP so no need to check the
>> * destination endpoint ID, the SPMC will take care of that for us.
>> */
>> - return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_hi,
>> - bitmap_lo);
>> + return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0, bitmap_lo,
>> + bitmap_hi);
>> }
>>
>> void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.