[PATCH] CHANGELOG: Mention xl suspend/resume

Jason Andryuk posted 1 patch 11 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://gitlab.com/xen-project/patchew/xen tags/patchew/20241205195026.3523-1-jason.andryuk@amd.com
There is a newer version of this series
CHANGELOG.md | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
[PATCH] CHANGELOG: Mention xl suspend/resume
Posted by Jason Andryuk 11 months ago
Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
---
It only works for x86, but it isn't x86-specific.  I chose to add it as
a generic entry instead of listing it as x86.
---
 CHANGELOG.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index 8553b2e451..5e912b3759 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
 ### Added
  - On Arm:
    - Experimental support for Armv8-R.
+ - xl suspend/resume subcommands.
 
 ### Removed
  - On x86:
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH] CHANGELOG: Mention xl suspend/resume
Posted by Jan Beulich 10 months, 4 weeks ago
On 05.12.2024 20:50, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
> ---
> It only works for x86, but it isn't x86-specific.  I chose to add it as
> a generic entry instead of listing it as x86.

Which probably is fine, yet then ...

> --- a/CHANGELOG.md
> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
>  ### Added
>   - On Arm:
>     - Experimental support for Armv8-R.
> + - xl suspend/resume subcommands.

... you'd want to name the limitation to x86 here anyway, I think. Unless
there are firm plans to remove the limitation by 4.20 going out.

Jan
Re: [PATCH] CHANGELOG: Mention xl suspend/resume
Posted by Jason Andryuk 10 months, 3 weeks ago
On 2024-12-09 04:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.12.2024 20:50, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
>> ---
>> It only works for x86, but it isn't x86-specific.  I chose to add it as
>> a generic entry instead of listing it as x86.
> 
> Which probably is fine, yet then ...
> 
>> --- a/CHANGELOG.md
>> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
>>   ### Added
>>    - On Arm:
>>      - Experimental support for Armv8-R.
>> + - xl suspend/resume subcommands.
> 
> ... you'd want to name the limitation to x86 here anyway, I think. Unless
> there are firm plans to remove the limitation by 4.20 going out.

No, I don't think there are any plans to remove the limitation.

This seems weird since the feature depends on platform implementations 
of hypercalls and library plumbing:

  - On x86:
    - xl suspend/resume subcommands.

Whereas this seems unusual since it's not following the above format:

  - xl suspend/resume subcommands (x86 only).

I guess I'd put it under "On x86" if I had to choose.

Regards,
Jason
Re: [PATCH] CHANGELOG: Mention xl suspend/resume
Posted by Jan Beulich 10 months, 3 weeks ago
On 09.12.2024 20:20, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On 2024-12-09 04:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.12.2024 20:50, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> It only works for x86, but it isn't x86-specific.  I chose to add it as
>>> a generic entry instead of listing it as x86.
>>
>> Which probably is fine, yet then ...
>>
>>> --- a/CHANGELOG.md
>>> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
>>>   ### Added
>>>    - On Arm:
>>>      - Experimental support for Armv8-R.
>>> + - xl suspend/resume subcommands.
>>
>> ... you'd want to name the limitation to x86 here anyway, I think. Unless
>> there are firm plans to remove the limitation by 4.20 going out.
> 
> No, I don't think there are any plans to remove the limitation.
> 
> This seems weird since the feature depends on platform implementations of hypercalls and library plumbing:
> 
>  - On x86:
>    - xl suspend/resume subcommands.
> 
> Whereas this seems unusual since it's not following the above format:
> 
>  - xl suspend/resume subcommands (x86 only).
> 
> I guess I'd put it under "On x86" if I had to choose.

I'd be fine with either; neither looks more "weird" to me than the other.

Jan