There are no violations left, make the rule globally blocking for both x86 and
ARM.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
index 755ea3271fc9..cb4e233e838d 100644
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ MC3R1.R20.2||
MC3R1.R20.3||
MC3R1.R20.4||
MC3R1.R20.6||
+MC3R1.R20.7||
MC3R1.R20.9||
MC3R1.R20.11||
MC3R1.R20.12||
@@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ if(string_equal(target,"x86_64"),
)
if(string_equal(target,"arm64"),
- service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6||MC3R1.R20.7"})
+ service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6"})
)
-reports+={clean:added,"service(clean_guidelines_common||additional_clean_guidelines)"}
--
2.46.0
Hello Oleksii,
This is in principle ready to go in now (I'm currently running a
private Eclair scan to ensure the patch is still OK against current
staging). I would like to ask for a release Ack.
Thanks, Roger.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> There are no violations left, make the rule globally blocking for both x86 and
> ARM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> ---
> automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
> index 755ea3271fc9..cb4e233e838d 100644
> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ MC3R1.R20.2||
> MC3R1.R20.3||
> MC3R1.R20.4||
> MC3R1.R20.6||
> +MC3R1.R20.7||
> MC3R1.R20.9||
> MC3R1.R20.11||
> MC3R1.R20.12||
> @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ if(string_equal(target,"x86_64"),
> )
>
> if(string_equal(target,"arm64"),
> - service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6||MC3R1.R20.7"})
> + service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6"})
> )
>
> -reports+={clean:added,"service(clean_guidelines_common||additional_clean_guidelines)"}
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Hi Roger,
On 1/14/25 12:22 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Hello Oleksii,
>
> This is in principle ready to go in now (I'm currently running a
> private Eclair scan to ensure the patch is still OK against current
> staging). I would like to ask for a release Ack.
R-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
Thanks.
~ Oleksii
>
> Thanks, Roger.
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> There are no violations left, make the rule globally blocking for both x86 and
>> ARM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
>> index 755ea3271fc9..cb4e233e838d 100644
>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ MC3R1.R20.2||
>> MC3R1.R20.3||
>> MC3R1.R20.4||
>> MC3R1.R20.6||
>> +MC3R1.R20.7||
>> MC3R1.R20.9||
>> MC3R1.R20.11||
>> MC3R1.R20.12||
>> @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ if(string_equal(target,"x86_64"),
>> )
>>
>> if(string_equal(target,"arm64"),
>> - service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6||MC3R1.R20.7"})
>> + service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6"})
>> )
>>
>> -reports+={clean:added,"service(clean_guidelines_common||additional_clean_guidelines)"}
>> --
>> 2.46.0
>>
On 2025-01-14 12:22, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Hello Oleksii,
>
> This is in principle ready to go in now (I'm currently running a
> private Eclair scan to ensure the patch is still OK against current
> staging). I would like to ask for a release Ack.
>
One nit below, which I overlooked initially
> Thanks, Roger.
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> There are no violations left, make the rule globally blocking for both
>> x86 and
>> ARM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
>> b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
>> index 755ea3271fc9..cb4e233e838d 100644
>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ MC3R1.R20.2||
>> MC3R1.R20.3||
>> MC3R1.R20.4||
>> MC3R1.R20.6||
>> +MC3R1.R20.7||
>> MC3R1.R20.9||
>> MC3R1.R20.11||
>> MC3R1.R20.12||
>> @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ if(string_equal(target,"x86_64"),
>> )
this hunk will not apply because it uses MC3R1, rather than MC3R2.
Should be an easy fix.
>>
>> if(string_equal(target,"arm64"),
>> -
>> service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6||MC3R1.R20.7"})
>> +
>> service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6"})
>> )
here as well
>>
>>
>> -reports+={clean:added,"service(clean_guidelines_common||additional_clean_guidelines)"}
>> --
>> 2.46.0
>>
--
Nicola Vetrini, B.Sc.
Software Engineer
BUGSENG (https://bugseng.com)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicola-vetrini-a42471253
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:24:30PM +0100, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2025-01-14 12:22, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > Hello Oleksii,
> >
> > This is in principle ready to go in now (I'm currently running a
> > private Eclair scan to ensure the patch is still OK against current
> > staging). I would like to ask for a release Ack.
> >
>
> One nit below, which I overlooked initially
>
> > Thanks, Roger.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > > There are no violations left, make the rule globally blocking for
> > > both x86 and
> > > ARM.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> > > ---
> > > automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
> > > b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
> > > index 755ea3271fc9..cb4e233e838d 100644
> > > --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
> > > +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/tagging.ecl
> > > @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ MC3R1.R20.2||
> > > MC3R1.R20.3||
> > > MC3R1.R20.4||
> > > MC3R1.R20.6||
> > > +MC3R1.R20.7||
> > > MC3R1.R20.9||
> > > MC3R1.R20.11||
> > > MC3R1.R20.12||
> > > @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ if(string_equal(target,"x86_64"),
> > > )
>
> this hunk will not apply because it uses MC3R1, rather than MC3R2. Should be
> an easy fix.
>
> > >
> > > if(string_equal(target,"arm64"),
> > > - service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6||MC3R1.R20.7"})
> > > + service_selector({"additional_clean_guidelines","MC3R1.R2.1||MC3R1.R5.3||MC3.R11.2||MC3R1.R16.6"})
> > > )
>
> here as well
Yeah indeed, I had to rebase the patch:
https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/royger/xen/-/commit/538439d59dc338ee3861bf1bc056783671ba1fc2
Let's see if Eclair is happy with it, currently running a pipeline.
Thanks, Roger.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.