[PATCH for-4.19 v4] x86/irq: forward pending interrupts to new destination in fixup_irqs()

Roger Pau Monne posted 1 patch 5 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://gitlab.com/xen-project/patchew/xen tags/patchew/20240619095833.76271-1-roger.pau@citrix.com
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h |  5 ++++
xen/arch/x86/irq.c              | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[PATCH for-4.19 v4] x86/irq: forward pending interrupts to new destination in fixup_irqs()
Posted by Roger Pau Monne 5 months ago
fixup_irqs() is used to evacuate interrupts from to be offlined CPUs.  Given
the CPU is to become offline, the normal migration logic used by Xen where the
vector in the previous target(s) is left configured until the interrupt is
received on the new destination is not suitable.

Instead attempt to do as much as possible in order to prevent loosing
interrupts.  If fixup_irqs() is called from the CPU to be offlined (as is
currently the case for CPU hot unplug) attempt to forward pending vectors when
interrupts that target the current CPU are migrated to a different destination.

Additionally, for interrupts that have already been moved from the current CPU
prior to the call to fixup_irqs() but that haven't been delivered to the new
destination (iow: interrupts with move_in_progress set and the current CPU set
in ->arch.old_cpu_mask) also check whether the previous vector is pending and
forward it to the new destination.

This allows us to remove the window with interrupts enabled at the bottom of
fixup_irqs().  Such window wasn't safe anyway: references to the CPU to become
offline are removed from interrupts masks, but the per-CPU vector_irq[] array
is not updated to reflect those changes (as the CPU is going offline anyway).

Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
Changes since v3:
 - Move the IRR check after the cpumask_copy().

Changes since v2:
 - Remove interrupt enabled window from fixup_irqs().
 - Adjust comments and commit message.

Changes since v1:
 - Rename to apic_irr_read().
---
 xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h |  5 ++++
 xen/arch/x86/irq.c              | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index d1cb001fb4ab..7bd66dc6e151 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -132,6 +132,11 @@ static inline bool apic_isr_read(uint8_t vector)
             (vector & 0x1f)) & 1;
 }
 
+static inline bool apic_irr_read(unsigned int vector)
+{
+    return apic_read(APIC_IRR + (vector / 32 * 0x10)) & (1U << (vector % 32));
+}
+
 static inline u32 get_apic_id(void)
 {
     u32 id = apic_read(APIC_ID);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
index d7f15c38af22..9a611c79e024 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
@@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, bool verbose)
 
     for ( irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++ )
     {
-        bool break_affinity = false, set_affinity = true;
+        bool break_affinity = false, set_affinity = true, check_irr = false;
         unsigned int vector, cpu = smp_processor_id();
         cpumask_t *affinity = this_cpu(scratch_cpumask);
 
@@ -2644,6 +2644,25 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, bool verbose)
              !cpu_online(cpu) &&
              cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, desc->arch.old_cpu_mask) )
         {
+            /*
+             * This to be offlined CPU was the target of an interrupt that's
+             * been moved, and the new destination target hasn't yet
+             * acknowledged any interrupt from it.
+             *
+             * We know the interrupt is configured to target the new CPU at
+             * this point, so we can check IRR for any pending vectors and
+             * forward them to the new destination.
+             *
+             * Note that for the other case of an interrupt movement being in
+             * progress (move_cleanup_count being non-zero) we know the new
+             * destination has already acked at least one interrupt from this
+             * source, and hence there's no need to forward any stale
+             * interrupts.
+             */
+            if ( apic_irr_read(desc->arch.old_vector) )
+                send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpumask_any(desc->arch.cpu_mask)),
+                              desc->arch.vector);
+
             /*
              * This CPU is going offline, remove it from ->arch.old_cpu_mask
              * and possibly release the old vector if the old mask becomes
@@ -2684,6 +2703,14 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, bool verbose)
         if ( desc->handler->disable )
             desc->handler->disable(desc);
 
+        /*
+         * If the current CPU is going offline and is (one of) the target(s) of
+         * the interrupt, signal to check whether there are any pending vectors
+         * to be handled in the local APIC after the interrupt has been moved.
+         */
+        if ( !cpu_online(cpu) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, desc->arch.cpu_mask) )
+            check_irr = true;
+
         if ( desc->handler->set_affinity )
             desc->handler->set_affinity(desc, affinity);
         else if ( !(warned++) )
@@ -2694,6 +2721,18 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, bool verbose)
 
         cpumask_copy(affinity, desc->affinity);
 
+        if ( check_irr && apic_irr_read(vector) )
+            /*
+             * Forward pending interrupt to the new destination, this CPU is
+             * going offline and otherwise the interrupt would be lost.
+             *
+             * Do the IRR check as late as possible before releasing the irq
+             * desc in order for any in-flight interrupts to be delivered to
+             * the lapic.
+             */
+            send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpumask_any(desc->arch.cpu_mask)),
+                          desc->arch.vector);
+
         spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
 
         if ( !verbose )
@@ -2705,11 +2744,6 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, bool verbose)
             printk("Broke affinity for IRQ%u, new: {%*pbl}\n",
                    irq, CPUMASK_PR(affinity));
     }
-
-    /* That doesn't seem sufficient.  Give it 1ms. */
-    local_irq_enable();
-    mdelay(1);
-    local_irq_disable();
 }
 
 void fixup_eoi(void)
-- 
2.45.2


Re: [PATCH for-4.19 v4] x86/irq: forward pending interrupts to new destination in fixup_irqs()
Posted by Jan Beulich 5 months ago
On 19.06.2024 11:58, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> fixup_irqs() is used to evacuate interrupts from to be offlined CPUs.  Given
> the CPU is to become offline, the normal migration logic used by Xen where the
> vector in the previous target(s) is left configured until the interrupt is
> received on the new destination is not suitable.
> 
> Instead attempt to do as much as possible in order to prevent loosing
> interrupts.  If fixup_irqs() is called from the CPU to be offlined (as is
> currently the case for CPU hot unplug) attempt to forward pending vectors when
> interrupts that target the current CPU are migrated to a different destination.
> 
> Additionally, for interrupts that have already been moved from the current CPU
> prior to the call to fixup_irqs() but that haven't been delivered to the new
> destination (iow: interrupts with move_in_progress set and the current CPU set
> in ->arch.old_cpu_mask) also check whether the previous vector is pending and
> forward it to the new destination.
> 
> This allows us to remove the window with interrupts enabled at the bottom of
> fixup_irqs().  Such window wasn't safe anyway: references to the CPU to become
> offline are removed from interrupts masks, but the per-CPU vector_irq[] array
> is not updated to reflect those changes (as the CPU is going offline anyway).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>



Re: [PATCH for-4.19 v4] x86/irq: forward pending interrupts to new destination in fixup_irqs()
Posted by Oleksii K. 5 months ago
On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 13:53 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.06.2024 11:58, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > fixup_irqs() is used to evacuate interrupts from to be offlined
> > CPUs.  Given
> > the CPU is to become offline, the normal migration logic used by
> > Xen where the
> > vector in the previous target(s) is left configured until the
> > interrupt is
> > received on the new destination is not suitable.
> > 
> > Instead attempt to do as much as possible in order to prevent
> > loosing
> > interrupts.  If fixup_irqs() is called from the CPU to be offlined
> > (as is
> > currently the case for CPU hot unplug) attempt to forward pending
> > vectors when
> > interrupts that target the current CPU are migrated to a different
> > destination.
> > 
> > Additionally, for interrupts that have already been moved from the
> > current CPU
> > prior to the call to fixup_irqs() but that haven't been delivered
> > to the new
> > destination (iow: interrupts with move_in_progress set and the
> > current CPU set
> > in ->arch.old_cpu_mask) also check whether the previous vector is
> > pending and
> > forward it to the new destination.
> > 
> > This allows us to remove the window with interrupts enabled at the
> > bottom of
> > fixup_irqs().  Such window wasn't safe anyway: references to the
> > CPU to become
> > offline are removed from interrupts masks, but the per-CPU
> > vector_irq[] array
> > is not updated to reflect those changes (as the CPU is going
> > offline anyway).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>

~ Oleksii