From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>

I was scanning for code that we could potentially move from the
.text section into .init.text and found a few candidates.

I'm not sure if this makes sense, perhaps we don't want to mark
these functions for other reasons but my scripts found this chain
of SMMUv3 init functions as only reachable by .inittext code.
Perhaps it's a little late in the release cycle to consider this...

Best regards,
Edgar


Edgar E. Iglesias (1):
  xen/arm: smmuv3: Mark more init-only functions with __init

 xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.40.1

Hi Edgar,

On 22/05/2024 14:28, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
> 
> I was scanning for code that we could potentially move from the
> .text section into .init.text and found a few candidates.
> 
> I'm not sure if this makes sense, perhaps we don't want to mark
> these functions for other reasons but my scripts found this chain
> of SMMUv3 init functions as only reachable by .inittext code.
> Perhaps it's a little late in the release cycle to consider this...

The risk of the change is limited and the SMMUv3 driver is still in tech 
preview. So I would say it would be fine as long as it is fully reviewed 
by the code freeze date (14th June).

CCing the release manager (Oleksii) to check if he is happy with 
committing this patch in 4.19. If not, I can queue it in a personal 
branch until the tree is re-opened.

But note this still need a review frome either Bertrand or Rahul.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall