From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@amd.com>

Add 14.3, with project-wide deviations.

Also take the opportunity to clarify that parameters of function pointer
types are expected to have names (Rule 8.2).

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@amd.com>
---
v2:
- remove 14.4
- better wording for the 8.2 clarification
- add while(0) and while(1) to 14.3
- add ?: to the deviation
- remove list of statements the rule applies to
---
 docs/misra/rules.rst | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/misra/rules.rst b/docs/misra/rules.rst
index db30632b93..9389976290 100644
--- a/docs/misra/rules.rst
+++ b/docs/misra/rules.rst
@@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change.
    * - `Rule 8.2 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_08_02.c>`_
      - Required
      - Function types shall be in prototype form with named parameters
-     -
+     - Clarification: both function and function pointers types shall
+       have named parameters.
 
    * - `Rule 8.3 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_08_03.c>`_
      - Required
@@ -332,6 +333,17 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change.
      - A loop counter shall not have essentially floating type
      -
 
+   * - `Rule 14.3 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_14_03.c>`_
+     - Required
+     - Controlling expressions shall not be invariant
+     - Due to the extensive usage of IS_ENABLED, sizeof compile-time
+       checks, and other constructs that are detected as errors by MISRA
+       C scanners, managing the configuration of a MISRA C scanner for
+       this rule would be unmanageable. Thus, this rule is adopted with
+       a project-wide deviation on if and ?: statements.
+
+       while(0) and while(1) are allowed.
+
    * - `Rule 16.7 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_16_07.c>`_
      - Required
      - A switch-expression shall not have essentially Boolean type
-- 
2.25.1

On 31.08.2023 03:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> @@ -332,6 +333,17 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change.
>       - A loop counter shall not have essentially floating type
>       -
>  
> +   * - `Rule 14.3 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_14_03.c>`_
> +     - Required
> +     - Controlling expressions shall not be invariant
> +     - Due to the extensive usage of IS_ENABLED, sizeof compile-time
> +       checks, and other constructs that are detected as errors by MISRA
> +       C scanners, managing the configuration of a MISRA C scanner for
> +       this rule would be unmanageable. Thus, this rule is adopted with
> +       a project-wide deviation on if and ?: statements.

As before - switch(sizeof(...)) and alike also wants deviating, imo.

> +       while(0) and while(1) are allowed.

... and alike ... (to also cover e.g. while(true)).

Jan

On Thu, 31 Aug 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.08.2023 03:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > @@ -332,6 +333,17 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change.
> >       - A loop counter shall not have essentially floating type
> >       -
> >  
> > +   * - `Rule 14.3 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_14_03.c>`_
> > +     - Required
> > +     - Controlling expressions shall not be invariant
> > +     - Due to the extensive usage of IS_ENABLED, sizeof compile-time
> > +       checks, and other constructs that are detected as errors by MISRA
> > +       C scanners, managing the configuration of a MISRA C scanner for
> > +       this rule would be unmanageable. Thus, this rule is adopted with
> > +       a project-wide deviation on if and ?: statements.
> 
> As before - switch(sizeof(...)) and alike also wants deviating, imo.

I added the switch, but without the words "and alike" because it is not
clear in this context what it would allow.


> > +       while(0) and while(1) are allowed.
> 
> ... and alike ... (to also cover e.g. while(true)).

Here the words "and alike" are clearer so I added them

On 07.09.2023 03:21, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 31.08.2023 03:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> @@ -332,6 +333,17 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change.
>>>       - A loop counter shall not have essentially floating type
>>>       -
>>>  
>>> +   * - `Rule 14.3 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_14_03.c>`_
>>> +     - Required
>>> +     - Controlling expressions shall not be invariant
>>> +     - Due to the extensive usage of IS_ENABLED, sizeof compile-time
>>> +       checks, and other constructs that are detected as errors by MISRA
>>> +       C scanners, managing the configuration of a MISRA C scanner for
>>> +       this rule would be unmanageable. Thus, this rule is adopted with
>>> +       a project-wide deviation on if and ?: statements.
>>
>> As before - switch(sizeof(...)) and alike also wants deviating, imo.
> 
> I added the switch, but without the words "and alike" because it is not
> clear in this context what it would allow.

Well, what I mean here are expressions involving sizeof() (or e.g also
offsetof()).

Jan