On 02/08/2023 04:59, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi Julien,
Hi Henry,
-----Original Message-----
>> From: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] xen/arm: Split MMU code as the prepration of
>> MPU work
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 01/08/2023 04:44, Henry Wang wrote:
>>> Based on the discussion in the Xen Summit [1], sending this series out after
>>> addressing the comments in v3 [2] as the preparation work to add MPU
>> support.
>>>
>>> Mostly code movement, with some of Kconfig and build system (mainly
>> Makefiles)
>>> adjustment. No functional change expected.
>>
>> I can't really review this series without knowing how this will
>> integrate with the rest of the MPU work.
>
> Sorry about it, I should have asked before sending the series.
>
>> Can you at least provide a tree
>> with all the patches applied (including the MPU one)?
>
> See [1] for the full single core MPU implementation which I've verified
> locally about the MMU and MPU single core Linux boot on FVP, and
> looks like Gitlab is also not complaining [2].
Thanks for the link!
>
> Note that I've addressed comments from you and Ayan in v3 about the
> MMU/MPU helpers duplication and the arm32/arm64 split work. I didn't
> address the comment in [3] about the RES0 stuff, but I think this is not
> related to the MMU split series I sent yesterday to mailing list and the
> formal v4 MPU work sent to the mailing list will contain the fix for this
> comment.
Agree, the RES0 bit is MPU specific.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall