Rework the config parsing of a p9 device to use the
split_string_into_pair() function instead of open coding it.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
tools/xl/xl_parse.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c b/tools/xl/xl_parse.c
index 2f9dfea05c..715e14f95f 100644
--- a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c
+++ b/tools/xl/xl_parse.c
@@ -2111,54 +2111,52 @@ void parse_config_data(const char *config_source,
if (!xlu_cfg_get_list(config, "p9", &p9devs, 0, 0)) {
libxl_device_p9 *p9;
- char *security_model = NULL;
- char *path = NULL;
- char *tag = NULL;
- char *backend = NULL;
- char *p, *p2, *buf2;
d_config->num_p9s = 0;
d_config->p9s = NULL;
while ((buf = xlu_cfg_get_listitem (p9devs, d_config->num_p9s)) != NULL) {
+ libxl_string_list pairs;
+ int len;
+
p9 = ARRAY_EXTEND_INIT(d_config->p9s,
d_config->num_p9s,
libxl_device_p9_init);
libxl_device_p9_init(p9);
- buf2 = strdup(buf);
- p = strtok(buf2, ",");
- if(p) {
- do {
- while(*p == ' ')
- ++p;
- if ((p2 = strchr(p, '=')) == NULL)
- break;
- *p2 = '\0';
- if (!strcmp(p, "security_model")) {
- security_model = strdup(p2 + 1);
- } else if(!strcmp(p, "path")) {
- path = strdup(p2 + 1);
- } else if(!strcmp(p, "tag")) {
- tag = strdup(p2 + 1);
- } else if(!strcmp(p, "backend")) {
- backend = strdup(p2 + 1);
- } else {
- fprintf(stderr, "Unknown string `%s' in 9pfs spec\n", p);
- exit(1);
- }
- } while ((p = strtok(NULL, ",")) != NULL);
- }
- if (!path || !security_model || !tag) {
- fprintf(stderr, "9pfs spec missing required field!\n");
- exit(1);
+ split_string_into_string_list(buf, ",", &pairs);
+ len = libxl_string_list_length(&pairs);
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ char *key, *value;
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = split_string_into_pair(pairs[i], "=", &key, &value,
+ isspace);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "failed to parse 9pfs configuration: %s",
+ pairs[i]);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (!strcmp(key, "security_model")) {
+ replace_string(&p9->security_model, value);
+ } else if (!strcmp(key, "path")) {
+ replace_string(&p9->path, value);
+ } else if (!strcmp(key, "tag")) {
+ replace_string(&p9->tag, value);
+ } else if (!strcmp(key, "backend")) {
+ replace_string(&p9->backend_domname, value);
+ } else {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Unknown 9pfs parameter '%s'\n", key);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ free(key);
+ free(value);
}
- free(buf2);
- replace_string(&p9->tag, tag);
- replace_string(&p9->security_model, security_model);
- replace_string(&p9->path, path);
- if (backend)
- replace_string(&p9->backend_domname, backend);
+ if (!p9->path || !p9->security_model || !p9->tag) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "9pfs spec missing required field!\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
}
}
--
2.35.3
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:15:46PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > Rework the config parsing of a p9 device to use the > split_string_into_pair() function instead of open coding it. But that wasn't an open codded version of split_string_into_pair(). Now if a value contains a '=', everything after it is ignored. split_string_into_pair() would split the string "foo=bar=void" into just "foo" and "bar". As the man page doesn't say that VALUE can't contains '=', this patch looks like a regression. I start to think that split_string_into_pair() is broken. I've notice the same issue when reviewing the "smbios" addition, and did proposed to "open code" split_string_into_pair(). But maybe that function needs fixing instead. Thanks, -- Anthony PERARD
On 21.03.23 11:44, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:15:46PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Rework the config parsing of a p9 device to use the >> split_string_into_pair() function instead of open coding it. > > But that wasn't an open codded version of split_string_into_pair(). Now > if a value contains a '=', everything after it is ignored. > > split_string_into_pair() would split the string "foo=bar=void" into just > "foo" and "bar". > > As the man page doesn't say that VALUE can't contains '=', this patch > looks like a regression. > > I start to think that split_string_into_pair() is broken. I've notice > the same issue when reviewing the "smbios" addition, and did proposed to > "open code" split_string_into_pair(). But maybe that function needs > fixing instead. Yes, I'll add a patch fixing split_string_into_pair(). Juergen
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:16 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote: > > Rework the config parsing of a p9 device to use the > split_string_into_pair() function instead of open coding it. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> > --- > tools/xl/xl_parse.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c b/tools/xl/xl_parse.c > index 2f9dfea05c..715e14f95f 100644 > --- a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c > +++ b/tools/xl/xl_parse.c > @@ -2111,54 +2111,52 @@ void parse_config_data(const char *config_source, > > if (!xlu_cfg_get_list(config, "p9", &p9devs, 0, 0)) { > libxl_device_p9 *p9; > - char *security_model = NULL; > - char *path = NULL; > - char *tag = NULL; > - char *backend = NULL; > - char *p, *p2, *buf2; > > d_config->num_p9s = 0; > d_config->p9s = NULL; > while ((buf = xlu_cfg_get_listitem (p9devs, d_config->num_p9s)) != NULL) { > + libxl_string_list pairs; > + int len; > + > p9 = ARRAY_EXTEND_INIT(d_config->p9s, > d_config->num_p9s, > libxl_device_p9_init); > libxl_device_p9_init(p9); > > - buf2 = strdup(buf); > - p = strtok(buf2, ","); > - if(p) { > - do { > - while(*p == ' ') > - ++p; > - if ((p2 = strchr(p, '=')) == NULL) > - break; > - *p2 = '\0'; > - if (!strcmp(p, "security_model")) { > - security_model = strdup(p2 + 1); > - } else if(!strcmp(p, "path")) { > - path = strdup(p2 + 1); > - } else if(!strcmp(p, "tag")) { > - tag = strdup(p2 + 1); > - } else if(!strcmp(p, "backend")) { > - backend = strdup(p2 + 1); > - } else { > - fprintf(stderr, "Unknown string `%s' in 9pfs spec\n", p); > - exit(1); > - } > - } while ((p = strtok(NULL, ",")) != NULL); > - } > - if (!path || !security_model || !tag) { > - fprintf(stderr, "9pfs spec missing required field!\n"); > - exit(1); > + split_string_into_string_list(buf, ",", &pairs); > + len = libxl_string_list_length(&pairs); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > + char *key, *value; > + int rc; > + > + rc = split_string_into_pair(pairs[i], "=", &key, &value, > + isspace); > + if (rc != 0) { > + fprintf(stderr, "failed to parse 9pfs configuration: %s", > + pairs[i]); > + exit(1); > + } > + > + if (!strcmp(key, "security_model")) { > + replace_string(&p9->security_model, value); > + } else if (!strcmp(key, "path")) { > + replace_string(&p9->path, value); > + } else if (!strcmp(key, "tag")) { > + replace_string(&p9->tag, value); > + } else if (!strcmp(key, "backend")) { > + replace_string(&p9->backend_domname, value); > + } else { > + fprintf(stderr, "Unknown 9pfs parameter '%s'\n", key); > + exit(1); > + } > + free(key); > + free(value); > } > - free(buf2); I think you need libxl_string_list_dispose(&pairs); somewhere around here? The rest looks good. Regards, Jason
On 20.03.23 18:12, Jason Andryuk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:16 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote: >> >> Rework the config parsing of a p9 device to use the >> split_string_into_pair() function instead of open coding it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> >> --- >> tools/xl/xl_parse.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c b/tools/xl/xl_parse.c >> index 2f9dfea05c..715e14f95f 100644 >> --- a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c >> +++ b/tools/xl/xl_parse.c >> @@ -2111,54 +2111,52 @@ void parse_config_data(const char *config_source, >> >> if (!xlu_cfg_get_list(config, "p9", &p9devs, 0, 0)) { >> libxl_device_p9 *p9; >> - char *security_model = NULL; >> - char *path = NULL; >> - char *tag = NULL; >> - char *backend = NULL; >> - char *p, *p2, *buf2; >> >> d_config->num_p9s = 0; >> d_config->p9s = NULL; >> while ((buf = xlu_cfg_get_listitem (p9devs, d_config->num_p9s)) != NULL) { >> + libxl_string_list pairs; >> + int len; >> + >> p9 = ARRAY_EXTEND_INIT(d_config->p9s, >> d_config->num_p9s, >> libxl_device_p9_init); >> libxl_device_p9_init(p9); >> >> - buf2 = strdup(buf); >> - p = strtok(buf2, ","); >> - if(p) { >> - do { >> - while(*p == ' ') >> - ++p; >> - if ((p2 = strchr(p, '=')) == NULL) >> - break; >> - *p2 = '\0'; >> - if (!strcmp(p, "security_model")) { >> - security_model = strdup(p2 + 1); >> - } else if(!strcmp(p, "path")) { >> - path = strdup(p2 + 1); >> - } else if(!strcmp(p, "tag")) { >> - tag = strdup(p2 + 1); >> - } else if(!strcmp(p, "backend")) { >> - backend = strdup(p2 + 1); >> - } else { >> - fprintf(stderr, "Unknown string `%s' in 9pfs spec\n", p); >> - exit(1); >> - } >> - } while ((p = strtok(NULL, ",")) != NULL); >> - } >> - if (!path || !security_model || !tag) { >> - fprintf(stderr, "9pfs spec missing required field!\n"); >> - exit(1); >> + split_string_into_string_list(buf, ",", &pairs); >> + len = libxl_string_list_length(&pairs); >> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { >> + char *key, *value; >> + int rc; >> + >> + rc = split_string_into_pair(pairs[i], "=", &key, &value, >> + isspace); >> + if (rc != 0) { >> + fprintf(stderr, "failed to parse 9pfs configuration: %s", >> + pairs[i]); >> + exit(1); >> + } >> + >> + if (!strcmp(key, "security_model")) { >> + replace_string(&p9->security_model, value); >> + } else if (!strcmp(key, "path")) { >> + replace_string(&p9->path, value); >> + } else if (!strcmp(key, "tag")) { >> + replace_string(&p9->tag, value); >> + } else if (!strcmp(key, "backend")) { >> + replace_string(&p9->backend_domname, value); >> + } else { >> + fprintf(stderr, "Unknown 9pfs parameter '%s'\n", key); >> + exit(1); >> + } >> + free(key); >> + free(value); >> } >> - free(buf2); > > I think you need libxl_string_list_dispose(&pairs); somewhere around here? Ah yes, thanks for noticing. Juergen
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.