Osstest/PDU/ipmi.pm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
The machine rimava0 doesn't power off or power on when we keep doing
"power status" then "power off" ipmi command without waiting.
Currently, osstest does:
loop
ipmitool power status
ipmitool power off
sleep 1
This loop goes on forever, the machine never change power state.
Adding some wait in between both command works.
While here, test for timeout just after a status check instead of
sending the `power off` command again which we would never check the
result of.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
---
Osstest/PDU/ipmi.pm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Osstest/PDU/ipmi.pm b/Osstest/PDU/ipmi.pm
index 21c94d98..ce498cb7 100644
--- a/Osstest/PDU/ipmi.pm
+++ b/Osstest/PDU/ipmi.pm
@@ -69,10 +69,10 @@ sub pdu_power_state {
my $count = 60;
for (;;) {
last if $getstatus->() eq $onoff;
+ die "did not power $onoff" unless --$count > 0;
+ sleep(1);
system_checked((@cmd, qw(power), $onoff));
-
- die "did not power $onoff" unless --$count > 0;
sleep(1);
}
}
--
Anthony PERARD
Anthony PERARD writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH] PDU/IPMI: Be less aggressive with IPMI commands"):
> The machine rimava0 doesn't power off or power on when we keep doing
> "power status" then "power off" ipmi command without waiting.
>
> Currently, osstest does:
> loop
> ipmitool power status
> ipmitool power off
> sleep 1
>
> This loop goes on forever, the machine never change power state.
> Adding some wait in between both command works.
How sad.
> While here, test for timeout just after a status check instead of
> sending the `power off` command again which we would never check the
> result of.
Reviewed-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.