> On 20 Dec 2022, at 09:55, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 20.12.2022 09:50, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> In this serie there are some fixes for the rule 20.7, mainly violation found by
>> cppcheck, most of them are false positive but some of them can be fixed.
>>
>> The analysed build is arm64, to reproduce the reports here the command:
>>
>> ./xen/scripts/xen-analysis.py --cppcheck-misra --run-cppcheck -- CROSS_COMPILE="aarch64-linux-gnu-" XEN_TARGET_ARCH="arm64" O=/path/to/artifacts_folder
>>
>> Luca Fancellu (18):
>> arm: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviations for alternative.h
>> arm: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on processor.h
>> arm: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on asm_defns.h
>> arm: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on config.h
>> arm: cppcheck: fix misra rule 20.7 on arm/include/asm/string.h
>> public: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 on public/arch-arm.h
>> xen: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on compiler.h
>> xen: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on init.h
>> xen: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on kconfig.h
>> xen: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on types.h
>> xen: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on xmalloc.h
>> arm: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on asm/arm64/sysregs.h
>> public/x86: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on hvm/save.h
>> public/x86: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on xen-x86_32.h
>> public/x86: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on xen-x86_64.h
>> public/x86: cppcheck: misra rule 20.7 deviation on arch-x86/xen.h
>> public: misra rule 20.7 deviation on errno.h
>> public: misra rule 20.7 deviation on memory.h
>
> Like Julien I object to the massive addition of false positive markers
> just because of very basic shortcomings in cppcheck. I find this
> particularly bad in public headers - imo no such annotations should
> appear there at all. I would suggest that you split off the actual
> code changes, which are likely going to be less controversial.
Yes I will send the patches with your review and drop the others with
False-positive or fixes that are not agreed.
>
> Jan