In order to have an easy and quick way to find out whether this domain memory
is statically configured, this commit introduces a new flag CDF_staticmem and a
new helper is_domain_using_staticmem() to tell.
Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@arm.com>
---
v5 changes:
- guard "is_domain_using_staticmem" under CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY
- #define is_domain_using_staticmem zero if undefined
---
v4 changes:
- no changes
---
v3 changes:
- change name from "is_domain_static()" to "is_domain_using_staticmem"
---
v2 changes:
- change name from "is_domain_on_static_allocation" to "is_domain_static()"
---
xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 5 ++++-
xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h | 4 ++++
xen/include/xen/domain.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 7ddd16c26d..f6e2e44c1e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -3287,9 +3287,12 @@ void __init create_domUs(void)
if ( !dt_device_is_compatible(node, "xen,domain") )
continue;
+ if ( dt_find_property(node, "xen,static-mem", NULL) )
+ flags |= CDF_staticmem;
+
if ( dt_property_read_bool(node, "direct-map") )
{
- if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY) || !dt_find_property(node, "xen,static-mem", NULL) )
+ if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY) || !(flags & CDF_staticmem) )
panic("direct-map is not valid for domain %s without static allocation.\n",
dt_node_name(node));
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
index fe7a029ebf..6bb999aff0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
@@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ enum domain_type {
#define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_directmap)
+#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY
+#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_staticmem)
+#endif
+
/*
* Is the domain using the host memory layout?
*
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/domain.h b/xen/include/xen/domain.h
index 1c3c88a14d..c613afa57e 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/domain.h
@@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ void arch_get_domain_info(const struct domain *d,
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
/* Should domain memory be directly mapped? */
#define CDF_directmap (1U << 1)
+/* Is domain memory on static allocation? */
+#define CDF_staticmem (1U << 2)
+#endif
+
+#ifndef is_domain_using_staticmem
+#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((void)(d), false)
#endif
/*
--
2.25.1
On Tue, 31 May 2022, Penny Zheng wrote:
> In order to have an easy and quick way to find out whether this domain memory
> is statically configured, this commit introduces a new flag CDF_staticmem and a
> new helper is_domain_using_staticmem() to tell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@arm.com>
I realize Jan asked for improvements but I just wanted to say that on my
side it looks good.
> ---
> v5 changes:
> - guard "is_domain_using_staticmem" under CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY
> - #define is_domain_using_staticmem zero if undefined
> ---
> v4 changes:
> - no changes
> ---
> v3 changes:
> - change name from "is_domain_static()" to "is_domain_using_staticmem"
> ---
> v2 changes:
> - change name from "is_domain_on_static_allocation" to "is_domain_static()"
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 5 ++++-
> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h | 4 ++++
> xen/include/xen/domain.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> index 7ddd16c26d..f6e2e44c1e 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> @@ -3287,9 +3287,12 @@ void __init create_domUs(void)
> if ( !dt_device_is_compatible(node, "xen,domain") )
> continue;
>
> + if ( dt_find_property(node, "xen,static-mem", NULL) )
> + flags |= CDF_staticmem;
> +
> if ( dt_property_read_bool(node, "direct-map") )
> {
> - if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY) || !dt_find_property(node, "xen,static-mem", NULL) )
> + if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY) || !(flags & CDF_staticmem) )
> panic("direct-map is not valid for domain %s without static allocation.\n",
> dt_node_name(node));
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> index fe7a029ebf..6bb999aff0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ enum domain_type {
>
> #define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_directmap)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY
> +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_staticmem)
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Is the domain using the host memory layout?
> *
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/domain.h b/xen/include/xen/domain.h
> index 1c3c88a14d..c613afa57e 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/domain.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ void arch_get_domain_info(const struct domain *d,
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> /* Should domain memory be directly mapped? */
> #define CDF_directmap (1U << 1)
> +/* Is domain memory on static allocation? */
> +#define CDF_staticmem (1U << 2)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef is_domain_using_staticmem
> +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((void)(d), false)
> #endif
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1
>
On 31.05.2022 05:12, Penny Zheng wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ enum domain_type {
>
> #define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_directmap)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY
> +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_staticmem)
> +#endif
Why is this in the Arm header, rather than ...
> --- a/xen/include/xen/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/domain.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ void arch_get_domain_info(const struct domain *d,
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> /* Should domain memory be directly mapped? */
> #define CDF_directmap (1U << 1)
> +/* Is domain memory on static allocation? */
> +#define CDF_staticmem (1U << 2)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef is_domain_using_staticmem
> +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((void)(d), false)
> #endif
... here (with what you have here now simply becoming the #else part)?
Once living here, I expect it also can be an inline function rather
than a macro, with the #ifdef merely inside its body.
Jan
Hi Jan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 4:41 PM
> To: Penny Zheng <Penny.Zheng@arm.com>
> Cc: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>; Stefano Stabellini
> <sstabellini@kernel.org>; Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>; Bertrand Marquis
> <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>; Volodymyr Babchuk
> <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>; Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>; George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>;
> Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] xen/arm: introduce CDF_staticmem
>
> On 31.05.2022 05:12, Penny Zheng wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ enum domain_type {
> >
> > #define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_directmap)
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY
> > +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_staticmem)
> > +#endif
>
> Why is this in the Arm header, rather than ...
>
> > --- a/xen/include/xen/domain.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/xen/domain.h
> > @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ void arch_get_domain_info(const struct domain *d,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > /* Should domain memory be directly mapped? */
> > #define CDF_directmap (1U << 1)
> > +/* Is domain memory on static allocation? */
> > +#define CDF_staticmem (1U << 2)
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#ifndef is_domain_using_staticmem
> > +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((void)(d), false)
> > #endif
>
> ... here (with what you have here now simply becoming the #else part)?
> Once living here, I expect it also can be an inline function rather than a macro,
> with the #ifdef merely inside its body.
>
In order to avoid bring the chicken and egg problem in xen/include/xen/domain.h,
I may need to move the static inline function to xen/include/xen/sched.h(which
has already included domain.h header).
> Jan
On 02.06.2022 12:07, Penny Zheng wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 4:41 PM
>>
>> On 31.05.2022 05:12, Penny Zheng wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
>>> @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ enum domain_type {
>>>
>>> #define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_directmap)
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY
>>> +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((d)->cdf & CDF_staticmem)
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Why is this in the Arm header, rather than ...
>>
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/domain.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/domain.h
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ void arch_get_domain_info(const struct domain *d,
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>> /* Should domain memory be directly mapped? */
>>> #define CDF_directmap (1U << 1)
>>> +/* Is domain memory on static allocation? */
>>> +#define CDF_staticmem (1U << 2)
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef is_domain_using_staticmem
>>> +#define is_domain_using_staticmem(d) ((void)(d), false)
>>> #endif
>>
>> ... here (with what you have here now simply becoming the #else part)?
>> Once living here, I expect it also can be an inline function rather than a macro,
>> with the #ifdef merely inside its body.
>>
>
> In order to avoid bring the chicken and egg problem in xen/include/xen/domain.h,
> I may need to move the static inline function to xen/include/xen/sched.h(which
> has already included domain.h header).
Hmm, yes, if made an inline function it would need to move to sched.h.
But as a macro it could live here (without one half needing to live
in the Arm header).
Jan
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.