From: Luca Miccio <lucmiccio@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Luca Miccio <lucmiccio@gmail.com>
---
 xen/include/xen/mm.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/include/xen/mm.h b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
index 3be754da92..f0861ed5bb 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
@@ -488,6 +488,8 @@ page_list_splice(struct page_list_head *list, struct page_list_head *head)
     list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, head, list)
 # define page_list_for_each_safe_reverse(pos, tmp, head) \
     list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pos, tmp, head, list)
+# define page_list_for_each_reverse(pos, head) \
+    list_for_each_entry_reverse(pos, head, list)
 #endif
 
 static inline unsigned int get_order_from_bytes(paddr_t size)
-- 
2.30.2

On 04.03.2022 18:46, Marco Solieri wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> @@ -488,6 +488,8 @@ page_list_splice(struct page_list_head *list, struct page_list_head *head)
>      list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, head, list)
>  # define page_list_for_each_safe_reverse(pos, tmp, head) \
>      list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pos, tmp, head, list)
> +# define page_list_for_each_reverse(pos, head) \
> +    list_for_each_entry_reverse(pos, head, list)
>  #endif

There are two sets of macros (for there being two flavors of lists),
and hence - even if you need only one form on Arm - the other form
should be introduced right away. I also think it would be far better
to merge this into the patch actually first needing the new
construct, as only then it'll be able to judge whether none of the
existing constructs would be a reasonable fit.

Jan