On 30.03.2022 12:21, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 03:45:12PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 18/02/2022 14:34, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The following series adds retpoline support for clang builds, and also
>>> allows the user to select whether to enable retpoline support at build
>>> time via a new Kconfig option.
>>>
>>> I've tried adding a suitable description to the Kconfig option, but I'm
>>> sure there's room for improvement.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Roger.
>>>
>>> Roger Pau Monne (3):
>>> x86/retpoline: split retpoline compiler support into separate option
>>> x86/clang: add retpoline support
>>> x86/Kconfig: introduce option to select retpoline usage
>>
>> Thanks. I think that's looking much better IMO.
>>
>> One thing, we want CC_HAS_* for consistency. I can fix this on commit.
>>
>> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>
> Could the patches be backported to stable-4.16?
Hmm, generally I'd view them as a feature rather than a bug fix, but
since you're explicitly requesting their backporting I guess I should
rather look at them from an improved-security angle.
Jan