[PATCH] x86/pv: remove unnecessary use of goto out in construct_dom0()

Jane Malalane posted 1 patch 2 years, 8 months ago
Failed in applying to current master (apply log)
xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
[PATCH] x86/pv: remove unnecessary use of goto out in construct_dom0()
Posted by Jane Malalane 2 years, 8 months ago
elf_check_broken() only needs to be invoked after elf_xen_parse() and
after elf_load_binary().

Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jane Malalane <jane.malalane@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
---
 xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
index 80e6c6e35b..db1e1e5edd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
@@ -379,8 +379,7 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d,
         }
 #else
         printk("Found 32-bit PV kernel, but CONFIG_PV32 missing\n");
-        rc = -ENODEV;
-        goto out;
+        return -ENODEV;
 #endif
     }
 
@@ -404,8 +403,7 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d,
     if ( !compatible )
     {
         printk("Mismatch between Xen and DOM0 kernel\n");
-        rc = -EINVAL;
-        goto out;
+        return -EINVAL;
     }
 
     if ( parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_SUPPORTED_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE )
@@ -413,8 +411,7 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d,
         if ( !pv_shim && !test_bit(XENFEAT_dom0, parms.f_supported) )
         {
             printk("Kernel does not support Dom0 operation\n");
-            rc = -EINVAL;
-            goto out;
+            return -EINVAL;
         }
     }
 
@@ -611,8 +608,7 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d,
          : (v_start < HYPERVISOR_VIRT_END) && (v_end > HYPERVISOR_VIRT_START) )
     {
         printk("DOM0 image overlaps with Xen private area.\n");
-        rc = -EINVAL;
-        goto out;
+        return -EINVAL;
     }
 
     if ( compat )
@@ -757,8 +753,7 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d,
             mapcache_override_current(NULL);
             switch_cr3_cr4(current->arch.cr3, read_cr4());
             printk("Invalid HYPERCALL_PAGE field in ELF notes.\n");
-            rc = -EINVAL;
-            goto out;
+            return -EINVAL;
         }
         init_hypercall_page(d, _p(parms.virt_hypercall));
     }
-- 
2.11.0


Re: [PATCH] x86/pv: remove unnecessary use of goto out in construct_dom0()
Posted by Jan Beulich 2 years, 8 months ago
On 13.08.2021 13:02, Jane Malalane wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
> @@ -379,8 +379,7 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d,
>          }
>  #else
>          printk("Found 32-bit PV kernel, but CONFIG_PV32 missing\n");
> -        rc = -ENODEV;
> -        goto out;
> +        return -ENODEV;
>  #endif
>      }

Afaict here you're fixing up your own earlier patch, which hasn't gone
in yet. I did expect you to alter that patch and resubmit, to then
omit this hunk here (again in a resubmission). With that the patch here
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Note that generally when a patch depends on another one which hasn't
been committed yet, you'd point out this fact in a post-commit-message
remark, so that reviewers (and possibly committer) are aware.

Jan