Hi Stefano,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> Sent: 2021年8月31日 9:51
> To: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; sstabellini@kernel.org; julien@xen.org;
> jbeulich@suse.com; Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [XEN RFC PATCH 38/40] xen/arm: enable device tree based NUMA
> in system init
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Wei Chen wrote:
> > Everything is ready, we can remove the fake NUMA node and
> > depends on device tree to create NUMA system.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
> > ---
> > xen/arch/arm/numa.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h | 7 ------
> > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/numa.c b/xen/arch/arm/numa.c
> > index 2a18c97470..3b04220e60 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/numa.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/numa.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > *
> > */
> > #include <xen/init.h>
> > +#include <xen/device_tree.h>
> > #include <xen/nodemask.h>
> > #include <xen/numa.h>
> > #include <xen/pfn.h>
> > @@ -83,28 +84,34 @@ void __init numa_init(bool acpi_off)
> > paddr_t ram_size = 0;
> > paddr_t ram_end = 0;
> >
> > - printk(XENLOG_WARNING
> > - "NUMA has not been supported yet, NUMA off!\n");
> > - /* Arm NUMA has not been implemented until this patch */
> > - numa_off = true;
> > + /* NUMA has been turned off through Xen parameters */
> > + if ( numa_off )
> > + goto mem_init;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Set all cpu_to_node mapping to 0, this will make cpu_to_node
> > - * function return 0 as previous fake cpu_to_node API.
> > - */
> > - for ( idx = 0; idx < NR_CPUS; idx++ )
> > - cpu_to_node[idx] = 0;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Make node_to_cpumask, node_spanned_pages and node_start_pfn
> > - * return as previous fake APIs.
> > - */
> > - for ( idx = 0; idx < MAX_NUMNODES; idx++ ) {
> > - node_to_cpumask[idx] = cpu_online_map;
> > - node_spanned_pages(idx) = (max_page - mfn_x(first_valid_mfn));
> > - node_start_pfn(idx) = (mfn_x(first_valid_mfn));
> > + /* Initialize NUMA from device tree when system is not ACPI booted
> */
> > + if ( acpi_off )
> > + {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_NUMA
> > + int ret = numa_device_tree_init(device_tree_flattened);
> > + if ( !ret )
> > + goto mem_init;
> > + printk(XENLOG_WARNING
> > + "Init NUMA from device tree failed, ret=%d\n", ret);
> > +#else
> > + printk(XENLOG_WARNING
> > + "CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_NUMA is not set, NUMA off!\n");
>
> I don't think we want to see this warning every time at boot when
> CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_NUMA is off. I'd set it to XENLOG_DEBUG or remove it.
>
OK
> Also given that we have many stub functions in
> xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h already, maybe we could also have a stub
> function for numa_device_tree_init so that we won'd need an #ifdef
> CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_NUMA here.
>
Yes, it's a good idea. I will do it.
>
> > +#endif
> > + numa_off = true;
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + /* We don't support NUMA for ACPI boot currently */
> > + printk(XENLOG_WARNING
> > + "ACPI NUMA has not been supported yet, NUMA off!\n");
> > + numa_off = true;
> > }
> >
> > +mem_init:
> > /*
> > * Find the minimal and maximum address of RAM, NUMA will
> > * build a memory to node mapping table for the whole range.
> > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> > index a3982a94b6..425eb9aede 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h
> > @@ -30,13 +30,6 @@ extern int numa_device_tree_init(const void *fdt);
> > extern void numa_set_distance(nodeid_t from, nodeid_t to, uint32_t
> distance);
> > extern void arch_numa_init_failed_fallback(void);
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Temporary for fake NUMA node, when CPU, memory and distance
> > - * matrix will be read from DTB or ACPI SRAT. The following
> > - * symbols will be removed.
> > - */
> > -extern mfn_t first_valid_mfn;
> > -
> > #else
> >
> > /* Fake one node for now. See also node_online_map. */
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >